The Association between Patient Characteristics and Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy

被引:4
作者
Siech, Carolin [1 ,2 ]
Wenzel, Mike [1 ]
Lange, Carsten [1 ]
Garcia, Cristina Cano [1 ]
Humke, Clara [1 ]
Tian, Zhe [2 ]
Karakiewicz, Pierre I. [2 ]
Traumann, Miriam [1 ]
Kluth, Luis A. [1 ]
Chun, Felix K. H. [1 ]
Hoeh, Benedikt [1 ]
Mandel, Philipp [1 ]
机构
[1] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, D-60590 Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Univ Montreal, Div Urol, Canc Prognost & Hlth Outcomes Unit, Hlth Ctr, Montreal, PQ H2X 3E4, Canada
来源
MEDICINA-LITHUANIA | 2024年 / 60卷 / 07期
关键词
age; BCR; body mass index; prostate cancer; prostate volume; radical prostatectomy; INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY; ISUP CONSENSUS; CANCER; VOLUME; IMPACT; DEFINITION; OUTCOMES; SIZE; RISK; AGE;
D O I
10.3390/medicina60071119
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Biochemical recurrence (BCR) represents the rise of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels after treatment with curative radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiation for prostate cancer. The objective of the current study was to test for the association between patient characteristics, namely age, body mass index (BMI), as well as prostate volume at surgery, and BCR after RP. Material and Methods: Within a tertiary care database, patients with prostate cancer treated with RP between January 2014 and June 2023 were included. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and Cox regression models addressed BCR after RP according to patient characteristics. Results: Of 821 patients, the median age was 66 years (interquartile range [IQR] 61-71 years), BMI was 26.2 kg/m(2) (IQR 24.3-28.8 kg/m(2)), and prostate volume was 40 cm(3) (IQR 30-55 cm(3)). Median follow-up was 20 months. In survival analyses, the three-year BCR-free survival rates were 81 vs. 84 vs. 81% in patients aged <= 60 vs. 61-69 vs. 70 years (p = 0.1). In patients with BMI < 25.0 vs. 25.0-29.9 vs. >= 30.0 kg/m(2), the three-year BCR-free survival rates were 84 vs. 81 vs. 84% (p = 0.7). In patients with prostate volume <= 40 vs. >40 cm(3), the three-year BCR-free survival rates were 85 vs. 80% (p = 0.004). In multivariable Cox regression models accounting for patient and pathologic tumor characteristics and adjuvant radiation therapy, a higher prostate volume independently predicted BCR as continuous (hazard ratio 1.012, 95% confidence interval 1.005-1.019; p < 0.001), as well as categorized the variable based on the median (hazard ratio 1.66, 95% confidence interval 1.17-2.36; p = 0.005). Conversely, neither age nor BMI were significantly associated with BCR after RP. Conclusions: The higher prostate volume independently predicted BCR after RP, but not age or BMI at surgery. Consequently, patients with an elevated prostate volume should be considered for closer postoperative follow-up.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Aetiology and management of earlier vs later biochemical recurrence after retropubic radical prostatectomy [J].
Llukani, Elton ;
Lepor, Herbert .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 120 (04) :505-510
[32]   The Surgical Learning Curve for Biochemical Recurrence After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy [J].
Bravi, Carlo A. ;
Dell'Oglio, Paolo ;
Mazzone, Elio ;
Moschovas, Marcio C. ;
Falagario, Ugo ;
Piazza, Pietro ;
Scarcella, Simone ;
Bednarz, Christopher ;
Sarchi, Luca ;
Tappero, Stefano ;
Knipper, Sophie ;
De Groote, Ruben ;
Sjoberg, Daniel ;
Schiavina, Riccardo ;
Suardi, Nazareno ;
Terrone, Carlo ;
Autorino, Riccardo ;
Carrieri, Giuseppe ;
Galosi, Andrea ;
Galfano, Antonio ;
Briganti, Alberto ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Patel, Vipul ;
Vickers, Andrew ;
Mottrie, Alexandre .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2023, 6 (04) :414-421
[33]   Biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy and postoperative radiotherapy: current evidence and controversial issues [J].
Longoni, Mattia ;
Falkenbach, Fabian ;
Graefen, Markus ;
Maurer, Tobias ;
Karakiewicz, Pierre I. ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Briganti, Alberto ;
Gandaglia, Giorgio .
CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2025, 35 (05) :510-516
[34]   Clinical value of cholinesterase in the prediction of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy [J].
D'Andrea, David ;
Soria, Francesco ;
Abufaraj, Mohammad ;
Gust, Kilian ;
Foerster, Beat ;
Vartolomei, Mihai D. ;
Kimura, Shoji ;
Mari, Andrea ;
Briganti, Alberto ;
Remzi, Mesut ;
Seitz, Christian K. ;
Mathieu, Romain ;
Karakiewicz, Pierre I. ;
Shariat, Shahrokh F. .
UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2018, 36 (12) :528.e7-528.e13
[35]   Testosterone replacement therapy reduces biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy [J].
Ahlering, Thomas E. ;
Huynh, Linda My ;
Towe, Maxwell ;
See, Kaelyn ;
Tran, Joshua ;
Osann, Kathryn ;
el Khatib, Farouk M. ;
Yafi, Faysal A. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 126 (01) :91-96
[36]   Are Diabetic Patients at Increased Risk for Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy? [J].
Alouane, Houssem Ben Hadj ;
Raboudi, Mehdi ;
Maatougui, Jasser ;
Dridi, Mohamed ;
Ghozzi, Samir .
CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (05)
[37]   Role of lymphatic invasion in predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy [J].
Chung, Dae Hyuk ;
Han, Jang Hee ;
Jeong, Seung-Hwan ;
Yuk, Hyeong Dong ;
Jeong, Chang Wook ;
Ku, Ja Hyeon ;
Kwak, Cheol .
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
[38]   A risk-adjusted definition of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy [J].
Morgan, T. M. ;
Meng, M. V. ;
Cooperberg, M. R. ;
Cowan, J. E. ;
Weinberg, V. ;
Carro, P. R. ;
Lin, D. W. .
PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2014, 17 (02) :174-179
[39]   Obesity, Prostate-Specific Antigen Nadir, and Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy: Biology or Technique? Results from the SEARCH Database [J].
Ho, Tammy ;
Gerber, Leah ;
Aronson, William J. ;
Terris, Martha K. ;
Presti, Joseph C. ;
Kane, Christopher J. ;
Amling, Christopher L. ;
Freedland, Stephen J. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 62 (05) :910-916
[40]   Is PSA Still the Best Predictor for Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy in High-Risk Prostate Cancer? [J].
Akan, Serkan ;
Guner, Numan Dogu ;
Ediz, Caner ;
Sahin, Aytac ;
Verit, Ayhan .
JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE SURGERY, 2022, 35 (10) :1733-1738