Improving Structure-Based Virtual Screening with Ensemble Docking and Machine Learning

被引:33
|
作者
Ricci-Lopez, Joel [1 ,2 ]
Aguila, Sergio A. [2 ]
Gilson, Michael K. [3 ]
Brizuela, Carlos A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Invest Cient & Educ Super Ensenada CICESE, Ensenada 22860, Baja California, Mexico
[2] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Ctr Nanociencias & Nanotecnol, Ensenada 22860, Baja California, Mexico
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, Skaggs Sch Pharm & Pharmaceut Sci, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
关键词
PROTEIN FLEXIBILITY; RECEPTOR FLEXIBILITY; MOLECULAR DOCKING; SCORING FUNCTIONS; BINDING-AFFINITY; DRUG-DISCOVERY; LIGAND DOCKING; CONFORMATIONS; COMBINATION; IMPROVEMENT;
D O I
10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00511
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
One of the main challenges of structure-based virtual screening (SBVS) is the incorporation of the receptor's flexibility, as its explicit representation in every docking run implies a high computational cost. Therefore, a common alternative to include the receptor's flexibility is the approach known as ensemble docking. Ensemble docking consists of using a set of receptor conformations and performing the docking assays over each of them. However, there is still no agreement on how to combine the ensemble docking results to obtain the final ligand ranking. A common choice is to use consensus strategies to aggregate the ensemble docking scores, but these strategies exhibit slight improvement regarding the single-structure approach. Here, we claim that using machine learning (ML) methodologies over the ensemble docking results could improve the predictive power of SBVS. To test this hypothesis, four proteins were selected as study cases: CDK2, FXa, EGFR, and HSP90. Protein conformational ensembles were built from crystallographic structures, whereas the evaluated compound library comprised up to three benchmarking data sets (DUD, DEKOIS 2.0, and CSAR-2012) and cocrystallized molecules. Ensemble docking results were processed through 30 repetitions of 4-fold cross-validation to train and validate two ML classifiers: logistic regression and gradient boosting trees. Our results indicate that the ML classifiers significantly outperform traditional consensus strategies and even the best performance case achieved with single-structure docking. We provide statistical evidence that supports the effectiveness of ML to improve the ensemble docking performance.
引用
收藏
页码:5362 / 5376
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Binding site characteristics in structure-based virtual screening: evaluation of current docking tools
    Tanja Schulz-Gasch
    Martin Stahl
    Journal of Molecular Modeling , 2003, 9 : 47 - 57
  • [42] Systematic Investigation of Docking Failures in Large-Scale Structure-Based Virtual Screening
    Xu, Min
    Shen, Cheng
    Yang, Jincai
    Wang, Qing
    Huang, Niu
    ACS OMEGA, 2022, 7 (43): : 39417 - 39428
  • [43] Binding site characteristics in structure-based virtual screening: evaluation of current docking tools
    Schulz-Gasch, T
    Stahl, M
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MODELING, 2003, 9 (01) : 47 - 57
  • [44] Interaction prediction in structure-based virtual screening using deep learning
    Gonczarek, Adam
    Tomczak, Jakub M.
    Zareba, Szymon
    Kaczmar, Joanna
    Dabrowski, Piotr
    Walczak, Michal J.
    COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2018, 100 : 253 - 258
  • [45] BigBind: Learning from Nonstructural Data for Structure-Based Virtual Screening
    Brocidiacono, Michael
    Francoeur, Paul
    Aggarwal, Rishal
    Popov, Konstantin I.
    Koes, David Ryan
    Tropsha, Alexander
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2023, 64 (07) : 2488 - 2495
  • [46] DLAB: deep learning methods for structure-based virtual screening of antibodies
    Schneider, Constantin
    Buchanan, Andrew
    Taddese, Bruck
    Deane, Charlotte M.
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2022, 38 (02) : 377 - 383
  • [47] Guided docking approaches to structure-based design and screening
    Fradera, X
    Mestres, J
    CURRENT TOPICS IN MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2004, 4 (07) : 687 - 700
  • [48] COMP 165-Screening very large virtual libraries using structure-based docking
    Sherman, B. Woody
    Higgs, Chris
    Shelley, Mee
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2007, 234
  • [49] Emerging Topics in Structure-Based Virtual Screening
    Giulio Rastelli
    Pharmaceutical Research, 2013, 30 : 1458 - 1463
  • [50] Virtual screening in structure-based drug discovery
    Barril, X
    Hubbard, RE
    Morley, SD
    MINI-REVIEWS IN MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2004, 4 (07) : 779 - 791