Spread-out Bragg peak FLASH: quantifying normal tissue toxicity in a murine model

被引:3
作者
Kristensen, Line [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Poulsen, Per Rugaard [1 ,3 ]
Kanouta, Eleni [1 ,3 ]
Rohrer, Sky [1 ]
Ankjaergaard, Christina [4 ]
Andersen, Claus E. [4 ]
Johansen, Jacob G. [1 ,3 ]
Simeonov, Yuri [5 ]
Weber, Uli [6 ]
Grau, Cai [1 ,3 ]
Sorensen, Brita Singers [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Danish Ctr Particle Therapy, Aarhus, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Expt Clin Oncol, Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ, Dept Clin Med, Aarhus, Denmark
[4] Tech Univ Denmark, DTU Hlth Tech, Roskilde, Denmark
[5] TH Mittelhessen, Inst Med Phys & Strahlenschutz, Giessen, Germany
[6] GSI Helmholtzzentrum Schwerionenforschung, Dept Biophys, Darmstadt, Germany
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2024年 / 14卷
关键词
FLASH radiation; spread-out Bragg peak; normal tissue sparing; acute toxicity; late toxicity; MONTE-CARLO SIMULATIONS; MICE;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2024.1427667
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective A favorable effect of ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) radiation on normal tissue-sparing has been indicated in several preclinical studies. In these studies, the adverse effects of radiation damage were reduced without compromising tumor control. Most studies of proton FLASH investigate these effects within the entrance of a proton beam. However, the real advantage of proton therapy lies in the Spread-out Bragg Peak (SOBP), which allows for giving a high dose to a target with a limited dose to healthy tissue at the entrance of the beam. Therefore, a clinically relevant investigation of the FLASH effect would be of healthy tissues within a SOBP. Our study quantified the tissue-sparing effect of FLASH radiation on acute and late toxicity within an SOBP in a murine model.Material/Methods Radiation-induced damage was assessed for acute and late toxicity in the same mice following irradiation with FLASH (Field dose rate of 60 Gy/s) or conventional (CONV, 0.34 Gy/s) dose rates. The right hindleg of unanesthetized female CDF1 mice was irradiated with single-fraction doses between 19.9-49.7 Gy for CONV and 30.4-65.9 Gy for FLASH with 5-8 mice per dose. The leg was placed in the middle of a 5 cm SOBP generated from a mono-energetic beam using a 2D range modulator. Acute skin toxicity quantified by hair loss, moist desquamation and toe separation was monitored daily within 29 days post-treatment. Late toxicity of fibrotic development measured by leg extendibility was monitored biweekly until 30 weeks post-treatment.Results Comparison of acute skin toxicity following radiation indicated a tissue-sparing effect of FLASH compared to conventional single-fraction radiation with a mean protection ratio of 1.40 (1.35-1.46). Fibrotic development similarly indicated normal tissue sparing with a 1.18 (1.17-1.18) protection ratio. The acute skin toxicity tissue sparing was similar to data from entrance-beam irradiations of S & oslash;rensen et al. (4).Conclusion Full dose-response curves for acute and late toxicity after CONV and FLASH radiation were obtained. Radiation within the SOBP retains the normal-tissue-sparing effect of FLASH with a dose-modifying factor of 40% for acute skin damage and 18% for fibrotic development.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Irradiation of subcutaneous mouse tumors with a clinical linear accelerator validated by alanine dosimetry [J].
Ankjaergaard, C. ;
Johansen, A. Z. ;
von Staffeldt, M. M. K. ;
Andersen, C. E. ;
Madsen, D. H. ;
Behrens, C. F. .
RADIATION MEASUREMENTS, 2021, 147
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2024, GraphPad prism for indos 64-bit
[3]   Dose- and Volume-Limiting Late Toxicity of FLASH Radiotherapy in Cats with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Nasal Planum and in Mini Pigs [J].
Bley, Carla Rohrer ;
Wolf, Friederike ;
Jorge, Patrik Goncalves ;
Grilj, Veljko ;
Petridis, Ioannis ;
Petit, Benoit ;
Boehlen, Till T. ;
Moeckli, Raphael ;
Limoli, Charles ;
Bourhis, Jean ;
Meier, Valeria ;
Vozenin, Marie-Catherine .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2022, 28 (17) :3814-3823
[4]   Normal Tissue Sparing by FLASH as a Function of Single-Fraction Dose: A Quantitative Analysis [J].
Boehlen, Till Tobias ;
Germond, Jean-Francois ;
Bourhis, Jean ;
Vozenin, Marie-Catherine ;
Ozsahin, Esat Mahmut ;
Bochud, Francois ;
Bailat, Claude ;
Moeckli, Raphael .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2022, 114 (05) :1032-1044
[5]   Evaluation of single-fraction high dose FLASH radiotherapy in a cohort of canine oral cancer patients [J].
Borresen, Betina ;
Arendt, Maja L. ;
Konradsson, Elise ;
Jensen, Kristine Bastholm ;
Back, Sven A. J. ;
Rosenschold, Per Munck af ;
Ceberg, Crister ;
Petersson, Kristoffer .
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
[6]   Clinical translation of FLASH radiotherapy: Why and how? [J].
Bourhis, Jean ;
Montay-Gruel, Pierre ;
Jorge, Patrik Goncalves ;
Bailat, Claude ;
Petit, Benoit ;
Ollivier, Jonathan ;
Jeanneret-Sozzi, Wendy ;
Ozsahin, Mahmut ;
Bochud, Francois ;
Moeckli, Raphael ;
Germond, Jean-Francois ;
Vozenin, Marie-Catherine .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 139 :11-17
[7]  
Charuchinda W., 2023, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, DOI 10.1088/1742-6596/2431/1/012081
[8]   Using a small-core graphite calorimeter for dosimetry and scintillator quenching corrections in a therapeutic proton beam [J].
Christensen, Jeppe Brage ;
Vestergaard, Anne ;
Andersen, Claus E. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2020, 65 (21)
[9]   FLASH Proton Pencil Beam Scanning Irradiation Minimizes Radiation-Induced Leg Contracture and Skin Toxicity in Mice [J].
Cunningham, Shannon ;
McCauley, Shelby ;
Vairamani, Kanimozhi ;
Speth, Joseph ;
Girdhani, Swati ;
Abel, Eric ;
Sharma, Ricky A. ;
Perentesis, John P. ;
Wells, Susanne I. ;
Mascia, Anthony ;
Sertorio, Mathieu .
CANCERS, 2021, 13 (05) :1-15
[10]   The current status of preclinical proton FLASH radiation and future directions [J].
Diffenderfer, Eric S. ;
Sorensen, Brita S. ;
Mazal, Alejandro ;
Carlson, David J. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (03) :2039-2054