Digital image analysis of Ki67 hotspot detection and index counting in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

被引:0
|
作者
Saetiew, Kritsanu [1 ,2 ]
Angkathunyakul, Napat [2 ]
Hunnangkul, Saowalak [3 ]
Pongpaibul, Ananya [2 ]
机构
[1] Srinakharinwirot Univ, Panyananthaphikkhu Chonprathan Med Ctr, Dept Anat Pathol, Bangkok, Thailand
[2] Mahidol Univ, Siriraj Hosp, Fac Med, Dept Pathol, 2 Wanglang Rd, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
[3] Mahidol Univ, Siriraj Hosp, Fac Med, Bangkok, Thailand
关键词
Ki-67 proliferative index; Neuroendocrine tumor; Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms; Hotspot selection; Gradient map visualization; Digital image analysis; QUANTIFICATION; GUIDELINES; TUMORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2024.152295
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
The Ki-67 proliferative index plays a pivotal role in the subclassification of neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) according to the WHO Classification of Digestive System Tumors (5th edition), which designates neuroendocrine tumor (NET) grades 1, 2, and 3 for Ki-67 proliferative index of <3 %, 3-20 %, and >20 %, respectively. Proliferative index calculation must be performed in the hotspot, traditionally selected by visual scanning at low-power magnification. Recently, gradient map visualization has emerged as a tool for various purposes, including hotspot selection. This study includes 97 cases of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms, with hotspots selected by bare eye and gradient map visualization (GM). Each hotspot was analyzed using three methods: eye estimation (EE), digital image analysis (DIA), and manual counting. Of the NENs studied, 91 % were NETs (26 % for G1, 55 % for G2, and 10 % for G3). Only 9 cases were neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). Between two hotspot selection methods, GM resulted in a higher grade in 14.77 % of cases, primarily upgrading from NET G1 to G2. Among the counting methods, DIA demonstrated substantial agreement with manual counting, both for pathologist and resident. Grading by other methods tended to result in a higher grade than MC (26.99 % with EE and 8.52 % with DIA). Given its clinical and statistical significance, this study advocates for the application of GM in hotspot selection to identify higher-grade tumors. Furthermore, DIA provides accurate grading, offering time efficiency over MC.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of the methods for measuring the Ki-67 labeling index in adrenocortical carcinoma: manual versus digital image analysis
    Yamazaki, Yuto
    Nakamura, Yasuhiro
    Shibahara, Yukiko
    Konosu-Fukaya, Sachiko
    Sato, Naomi
    Kubota-Nakayama, Fumie
    Oki, Yutaka
    Baba, Satoshi
    Midorikawa, Sanae
    Morimoto, Ryo
    Satoh, Fumitoshi
    Sasano, Hironobu
    HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2016, 53 : 41 - 50
  • [32] Exploration of Digital Image Analysis for Ki67 Quantification in the Grading of Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Pilot Study with 85 Cases
    David Blake Behrman
    Daniel J. Lubin
    Kelly Magliocca
    Qiuying Shi
    Kartik Viswanathan
    Head and Neck Pathology, 2023, 17 : 638 - 646
  • [33] Proliferation assessment in breast carcinomas using digital image analysis based on virtual Ki67/cytokeratin double staining
    Roge, Rasmus
    Riber-Hansen, Rikke
    Nielsen, Soren
    Vyberg, Mogens
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2016, 158 (01) : 11 - 19
  • [34] Exploration of Digital Image Analysis for Ki67 Quantification in the Grading of Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Pilot Study with 85 Cases
    Behrman, David Blake
    Lubin, Daniel J.
    Magliocca, Kelly
    Shi, Qiuying
    Viswanathan, Kartik
    HEAD & NECK PATHOLOGY, 2023, 17 (03): : 638 - 646
  • [35] Proliferation assessment in breast carcinomas using digital image analysis based on virtual Ki67/cytokeratin double staining
    Rasmus Røge
    Rikke Riber-Hansen
    Søren Nielsen
    Mogens Vyberg
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2016, 158 : 11 - 19
  • [36] Comparative analysis of Ki-67 labeling index morphometry using deep learning, conventional image analysis, and manual counting
    Alam, Mohammad Rizwan
    Seo, Kyung Jin
    Yim, Kwangil
    Liang, Phoebe
    Yeh, Joe
    Chang, Chifu
    Chong, Yosep
    TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2025, 51
  • [37] The assessment of Ki-67 for prognosis of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tao, Zhiwei
    Xue, Runxin
    Wei, Zhongcao
    Qin, Lingzhi
    Bai, Rui
    Liu, Na
    Wang, Jinhai
    Wang, Chuying
    TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 12 (08) : 1980 - 1991
  • [38] An interobserver reproducibility analysis of size-set semiautomatic counting for Ki67 assessment in breast cancer
    Wang, Yi-xing
    Wang, Yuan-yuan
    Yang, Cheng-gang
    Bu, Hong
    Yang, Wen-tao
    Wang, Li
    Xu, Wen-mang
    Zhao, Xi-long
    Zhao, Wen-xing
    Li, Lei
    Song, Shu-ling
    Yang, Ju-lun
    BREAST, 2020, 49 : 225 - 232
  • [39] Concordance Between the Ki-67 Index Cutoff Value of 55% and Differentiation in Neuroendocrine Tumor and Neuroendocrine Carcinoma in Grade 3 Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
    Shi, Huiying
    Chen, Luohai
    Zhang, Qin
    Lin, Yuan
    Jiang, Chen
    Yao, Hailing
    Hou, Xiaohua
    Chen, Minhu
    Lin, Rong
    Chen, Jie
    PANCREAS, 2020, 49 (10) : 1378 - 1382
  • [40] Discrepancy in the Ki67 labeling index of brain and orbital metastatic lesions from gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors: A case report
    Matsuo, Satoshi
    Amano, Toshiyuki
    Miyamatsu, Yuichiro
    Hayashi, Daisuke
    Yamashita, Sojiro
    Momosaki, Seiya
    Kawabe, Ken
    Nakamizo, Akira
    NEUROCIRUGIA, 2022, 33 (06): : 345 - 349