Digital image analysis of Ki67 hotspot detection and index counting in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

被引:1
|
作者
Saetiew, Kritsanu [1 ,2 ]
Angkathunyakul, Napat [2 ]
Hunnangkul, Saowalak [3 ]
Pongpaibul, Ananya [2 ]
机构
[1] Srinakharinwirot Univ, Panyananthaphikkhu Chonprathan Med Ctr, Dept Anat Pathol, Bangkok, Thailand
[2] Mahidol Univ, Siriraj Hosp, Fac Med, Dept Pathol, 2 Wanglang Rd, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
[3] Mahidol Univ, Siriraj Hosp, Fac Med, Bangkok, Thailand
关键词
Ki-67 proliferative index; Neuroendocrine tumor; Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms; Hotspot selection; Gradient map visualization; Digital image analysis; QUANTIFICATION; GUIDELINES; TUMORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2024.152295
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
The Ki-67 proliferative index plays a pivotal role in the subclassification of neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) according to the WHO Classification of Digestive System Tumors (5th edition), which designates neuroendocrine tumor (NET) grades 1, 2, and 3 for Ki-67 proliferative index of <3 %, 3-20 %, and >20 %, respectively. Proliferative index calculation must be performed in the hotspot, traditionally selected by visual scanning at low-power magnification. Recently, gradient map visualization has emerged as a tool for various purposes, including hotspot selection. This study includes 97 cases of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms, with hotspots selected by bare eye and gradient map visualization (GM). Each hotspot was analyzed using three methods: eye estimation (EE), digital image analysis (DIA), and manual counting. Of the NENs studied, 91 % were NETs (26 % for G1, 55 % for G2, and 10 % for G3). Only 9 cases were neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). Between two hotspot selection methods, GM resulted in a higher grade in 14.77 % of cases, primarily upgrading from NET G1 to G2. Among the counting methods, DIA demonstrated substantial agreement with manual counting, both for pathologist and resident. Grading by other methods tended to result in a higher grade than MC (26.99 % with EE and 8.52 % with DIA). Given its clinical and statistical significance, this study advocates for the application of GM in hotspot selection to identify higher-grade tumors. Furthermore, DIA provides accurate grading, offering time efficiency over MC.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Digital Image Analysis of Ki67 Heterogeneity Improves the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
    Zhang, Meng
    Tan, Cong
    Wang, Xin
    Ding, Xie
    Zhang, Boqiang
    Yang, Zuopeng
    Wang, Yu
    Sheng, Weiqi
    Huang, Dan
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2023, 36 (01)
  • [2] Digital Image Analysis of the Proliferation Markers Ki67 and Phosphohistone H3 in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Accuracy of Grading Compared With Routine Manual Hot Spot Evaluation of the Ki67 Index
    Lea, Dordi
    Gudlaugsson, Einar G.
    Skaland, Ivar
    Lillesand, Melinda
    Soreide, Kjetil
    Soreide, Jon A.
    APPLIED IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR MORPHOLOGY, 2021, 29 (07) : 499 - 505
  • [3] Digital image analysis of the Ki67 spatial distribution improves classification and grading in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms
    Huang, D.
    Wang, X.
    Tan, C.
    Sheng, W.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2021, 33 : 91 - 91
  • [4] Ki-67 Proliferation Index Assessment in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors by Digital Image Analysis With Stringent Case and Hotspot Level Concordance Requirements
    Boukhar, Sarag A.
    Gosse, Matthew D.
    Bellizzi, Andrew M.
    Rajan, Anand
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2021, 156 (04) : 607 - 619
  • [5] Objective Quantification of the Ki67 Proliferative Index in Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Gastroenteropancreatic System A Comparison of Digital Image Analysis With Manual Methods
    Tang, Laura H.
    Gonen, Mithat
    Hedvat, Cyrus
    Modlin, Irvin M.
    Klimstra, David S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2012, 36 (12) : 1761 - 1770
  • [6] Calculation of the Ki67 index in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a comparative analysis of four counting methodologies
    Reid, Michelle D.
    Bagci, Pelin
    Ohike, Nobuyuki
    Saka, Burcu
    Seven, Ipek Erbarut
    Dursun, Nevra
    Balci, Serdar
    Gucer, Hasan
    Jang, Kee-Taek
    Tajiri, Takuma
    Basturk, Olca
    Kong, So Yeon
    Goodman, Michael
    Akkas, Gizem
    Adsay, Volkan
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2015, 28 (05) : 686 - 694
  • [7] Implementation of Digital Image Analysis in Assessment of Ki67 Index in Breast Cancer
    Vanderschelden, Rachel K.
    Jerome, Jacob A.
    Gonzalez, Daniel
    Seigh, Lindsey
    Carter, Gloria J.
    Clark, Beth Z.
    Elishaev, Esther
    Louis Fine, Jeffrey
    Harinath, Lakshmi
    Jones, Mirka W.
    Villatoro, Tatiana M.
    Soong, Thing Rinda
    Yu, Jing
    Zhao, Chengquan
    Hartman, Doug
    Bhargava, Rohit
    APPLIED IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR MORPHOLOGY, 2024, 32 (01) : 17 - 23
  • [8] Image Analysis in Digital Pathology: Combining Automated Assessment of Ki67 Staining Quality with Calculation of Ki67 Cell Proliferation Index
    Bengtsson, Ewert
    Ranefall, Petter
    CYTOMETRY PART A, 2019, 95A (07) : 714 - 716
  • [9] Clinicopathologic characteristics of neuroendocrine tumors with assessment by digital image analysis for Ki-67 index with a focus on the gastroenteropancreatic tract: a single-center study
    Park, Ji Hyun
    Shin, Su-Jin
    Jeon, Nara
    Lim, Beom Jin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PATHOLOGY, 2023, 16 (09): : 225 - 234
  • [10] Digital image analysis of Ki-67 heterogeneity of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms with or without liver metastasis
    Zhang, M.
    Han, X.
    Ding, X.
    Zhang, B.
    Wang, Y.
    Xu, M.
    Huang, D.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2023, 35 : 130 - 130