The association of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest barriers to cardiopulmonary resuscitation initiation and continuation during the emergency call: A retrospective cohort study

被引:2
|
作者
Aldridge, Emogene S. [1 ]
Ball, Stephen [1 ,2 ]
Birnie, Tanya [1 ]
Perera, Nirukshi [1 ]
Whiteside, Austin [1 ,2 ]
Bray, Janet [1 ,3 ]
Finn, Judith [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ, Sch Nursing, Prehosp Resuscitat & Emergency Care Res Unit, Perth, WA, Australia
[2] St John Western Australia, Belmont, WA, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
来源
RESUSCITATION PLUS | 2024年 / 19卷
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Out -of -hospital cardiac arrest; Emergency calls;
D O I
10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100702
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background : In a previous study, we identified eight types of potential barriers to bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) initiation and continuation until the arrival of emergency medical services (EMS) on scene, in the context of emergency calls for out -of -hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Many cases had multiple barriers. In this study, we aimed to estimate the independent effects of these barriers after adjusting for case characteristics. Methods : We used data for the 295 non -trauma OHCAs from the St John Western Australian (SJ-WA) OHCA Database. Excluded cases were: EMS-witnessed OHCA, callers not with/close to the patient, OHCA not recognised during the emergency call, bystander CPR in progress prior to the call and calls coded as obvious death by SJ-WA. We conducted two multivariable logistic regression models including the eight barriers (callers: 1) perceived inappropriateness of CPR, 2) emotional distress, 3) reluctance to perform CPR, 4) physical limitations, 5) access to the patient, 6) leaving the scene, 7) communication failure, and 8) on -scene distractions) and case characteristics. Results : The callers perceiving CPR as inappropriate (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.20, 0.11-0.37) and witnessed arrest (AOR = 2.88, 95% CI 1.48-5.60) were independently associated with CPR initiation. Caller distractions such as performing other tasks or relaying information to other bystanders were negatively significantly associated with callers continuing CPR to EMS arrival (AOR = 0.27, 0.10-0.73). Conclusions : Perceptions of inappropriateness and caller distractions were independent risk factors for the delivery of bystander CPR. Further research around how call-takers navigate these barriers and encourage callers should be performed.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Neurologic outcome and location of cardiac arrest in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients who underwent extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A multicentre retrospective cohort in Japan
    Shirakawa, Kazuhiro
    Matsuoka, Yoshinori
    Yamamoto, Yosuke
    Inoue, Akihiko
    Takahashi, Ryo
    Yamada, Yoshie
    Ariyoshi, Koichi
    Hifumi, Toru
    Sakamoto, Tetsuya
    Kuroda, Y.
    RESUSCITATION PLUS, 2023, 16
  • [22] Recognition of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during emergency calls and public awareness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in communities: A multilevel analysis
    Lee, Sun Young
    Ro, Young Sun
    Shin, Sang Do
    Song, Kyoung Jun
    Hong, Ki Jeong
    Park, Jeong Ho
    Kong, So Yeon
    RESUSCITATION, 2018, 128 : 106 - 111
  • [23] Comorbidity and bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
    Hirlekar, Geir
    Jonsson, Martin
    Karlsson, Thomas
    Back, Maria
    Rawshani, Araz
    Hollenberg, Jacob
    Albertsson, Per
    Herlitz, Johan
    HEART, 2020, 106 (14) : 1087 - 1093
  • [24] Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A prospective observational study
    Sakamoto, Tetsuya
    Morimura, Naoto
    Nagao, Ken
    Asai, Yasufumi
    Yokota, Hiroyuki
    Nara, Satoshi
    Hase, Mamoru
    Tahara, Yoshio
    Atsumi, Takahiro
    RESUSCITATION, 2014, 85 (06) : 762 - 768
  • [25] The association of depression and patient and resuscitation characteristics with survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a cohort study
    Alotaibi, Raied
    Halbesma, Nynke
    Jackson, Caroline A.
    Clegg, Gareth
    Stieglis, Remy
    van Schuppen, Hans
    Tan, Hanno L.
    EUROPACE, 2024, 26 (08):
  • [26] Assertive Call-Taking Increases the Provision of Telephone Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation During Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
    Capone, Amy S.
    Munion, William M.
    Panczyk, Micah
    Chikani, Vatsal
    Spaite, Daniel W.
    Vadeboncoeur, Tyler F.
    Suell, Shikira
    George, Taylor A.
    Mullins, Terry
    Bobrow, Bentley J.
    CIRCULATION, 2017, 136
  • [27] Role of blood gas analysis during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients
    Kim, Youn-Jung
    Lee, You Jin
    Ryoo, Seung Mok
    Sohn, Chang Hwan
    Ahn, Shin
    Seo, Dong-Woo
    Lim, Kyoung Soo
    Kim, Won Young
    MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (25)
  • [28] Comparison of complications secondary to cardiopulmonary resuscitation between out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and in-hospital cardiac arrest
    Seung, Min Kyung
    You, Je Sung
    Lee, Hye Sun
    Park, Yoo Seok
    Chung, Sung Phil
    Park, Incheol
    RESUSCITATION, 2016, 98 : 64 - 72
  • [29] Association between pupillary examinations and prognosis in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest who underwent extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a retrospective multicentre cohort study
    Hamaguchi, Takuro
    Takiguchi, Toru
    Seki, Tomohisa
    Tominaga, Naoki
    Nakata, Jun
    Yamamoto, Takeshi
    Tagami, Takashi
    Inoue, Akihiko
    Hifumi, Toru
    Sakamoto, Tetsuya
    Kuroda, Yasuhiro
    Yokobori, Shoji
    ANNALS OF INTENSIVE CARE, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [30] Association Between Income and Risk of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    van Nieuwenhuizen, Benjamin P.
    Tan, Hanno L.
    Blom, Marieke T.
    Kunst, Anton E.
    van Valkengoed, Irene G. M.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES, 2023, 16 (02): : 95 - 102