HYDROGEN SULFIDE REMOVAL IN BIOGAS USING A FULL-SCALE BIOTRICKLING FILTER: EVALUATING SPRAYING TIME AND NITRATE SOURCE

被引:0
作者
Piovezan, Thais C. [1 ]
Mores, Rubia [2 ]
Steinmetz, Ricardo L. R. [3 ]
Kunz, Airton [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Fronteira Sul, Erechim, RS, Brazil
[2] Univ Contestado, Concordia, SC, Brazil
[3] Embrapa Suinos & Aves, Concordia, SC, Brazil
来源
ENGENHARIA AGRICOLA | 2024年 / 44卷
关键词
desulfurization; nitrate; biofilter and biogas; H2S;
D O I
10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v44e20240032/2024
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
The hydrogen sulfide (H2S) present in biogas needs to be removed due to concerns about corrosion during transportation, storage, health and safety. One of the existing removal processes is biological, using a biotrickling filter (BTF). In this study, the performance of full-scale BTF for H2S removal under different operating conditions was evaluated. The BTF system was operated for 300 days, during which two spraying regimes (constant and intermittent) and two sources of nitrate (NO3-) as nutrient solution were evaluated (residual effluent from pig farming and synthetic solution prepared with commercial NaNO3). The performance was monitored by the following parameters: removal efficiency (RE), elimination capacity (EC), pH, dissolved oxygen (DO), empty bed residence time (EBRT) and nitrate concentration (NO3-). The results showed an REH2S = 36.3% with an EC= 1.95 g(H2S) m(-3) d(-1) for constant spraying, RE= 99.59% and EC= 4.2 g(H2S) m(-3) d(-1) for intermittent spraying with residual effluent from pig farming and RE=99.26% and EC= 4.13 g(H2S) m(-3) d(-1) with synthetic solution prepared with commercial NaNO3 solution. The results indicate that intermittent spraying provides better efficiency in the removal of H2S from biogas regardless of the nitrate source (effluent or synthetic medium).
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Recent advances in biological technologies for anoxic biogas desulfurization [J].
Almenglo, F. ;
Gonzalez-Cortes, J. J. ;
Ramirez, M. ;
Cantero, D. .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2023, 321
[2]  
Almenglo F, 2016, Effect of gas-liquid flow pattern and microbial diversity analysis of a pilot-scale biotrickling filter for anoxic biogas desulfurization, DOI [10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.05.016, DOI 10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2016.05.016]
[3]  
ANP - Agencia Nacional do Petroleo Gas Natural e Biocombustiveis, 2022, Resolucao ANP N 906, de 18 de novembro de 2022 - Diario Oficial do Estado de Sao Paulo
[4]   Removal of hydrogen sulfide in biogas from wastewater treatment sludge by real scale biotrickling filtration desulfurization process [J].
Ariman, Sema ;
Koyuncu, Serdar .
WATER PRACTICE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 17 (07) :1406-1420
[5]   Technologies for biogas desulfurization- An overview of recent studies [J].
Becker, C. M. ;
Marder, M. ;
Junges, E. ;
Konrad, O. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2022, 159
[6]   Integration of swine manure anaerobic digestion and digestate nutrients removal/recovery under a circular economy concept [J].
Candido, Daniela ;
Bolsan, Alice Chiapetti ;
Hollas, Camila Ester ;
Venturin, Bruno ;
Tapparo, Deisi Cristina ;
Bonassa, Gabriela ;
Antes, Fabiane Goldschmidt ;
Steinmetz, Ricardo Lufs Radis ;
Bortoli, Marcelo ;
Kunz, Airton .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 301
[7]   Integration of a nitrification bioreactor and an anoxic biotrickling filter for simultaneous ammonium-rich water treatment and biogas desulfurization [J].
Cano, Patricio, I ;
Almenglo, Fernando ;
Ramirez, Martin ;
Cantero, Domingo .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2021, 284 (284)
[8]  
Cibiogas, 2023, Cibiogas
[9]   Simultaneous removal of H2S and NH3 from raw biogas in hollow fibre membrane bioreactors [J].
Das, Jewel ;
Nolan, Stephen ;
Lens, Piet N. L. .
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION, 2022, 28
[10]   Biological Co-treatment of H2S and reduction of CO2 to methane in an anoxic biological trickling filter upgrading biogas [J].
Dupnock, Trisha L. ;
Deshusses, Marc A. .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2020, 256