Financial statement audit and regulatory focus in equity crowdfunding decisions

被引:0
作者
Stevenson, Regan [1 ]
Eutsler, Jared [2 ]
Lang, Bradley [3 ]
Robertson, Jesse C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Kelley Sch Business, 1309 E 10th St, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[2] Univ North Texas, 1155 Union Circle, Denton, TX 76203 USA
[3] Mississippi State Univ, Adkerson Sch Accountancy, 40 Old Main, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
关键词
Assurance; Audit; Equity Crowdfunding; Investors; New Ventures; L26; M42; VENTURE CAPITALISTS; ANGEL INVESTMENT; FIT; PERFORMANCE; PREVENTION; ENTREPRENEURS; PROMOTION; IMPACT; FEEL; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s11187-024-00941-z
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Equity crowdfunding (ECF) allows amateur investors to fund startups and small and medium-size enterprises (SMEs). Unlike initial public offerings, ECF requires minimal disclosures, fast-tracking equity raising. ECF's popularity has surged, yet little is known about how assurance services might impact investor decisions. Drawing on regulatory focus theory, we examine how independent assurance, pitch characteristics, and investor regulatory focus influence investment decisions in ECF. Our results support our hypotheses that audits of historical financial information increase ECF investors' likelihood to invest. Further, interactions between the audit, investors' regulatory focus, and the regulatory focus of the ECF pitch increase investment such that the presence of an audit increases investment for prevention-focused individuals, and especially the audit is most likely to increase investment for prevention-focused investors when the SME's pitch is also prevention-focused. Overall, we contribute to literature by exploring the influence of assurance in a new context of ECF, shedding light on previously unexplored aspects of investor decision-making. Audits Increase Investment Likelihood in Equity Crowdfunding Decisions. Equity crowdfunding lets regular people invest in small businesses without the strict rules of traditional stock offerings. This study looked at how things like independent audits and the way a business pitches itself affect people's decisions to invest. We found that ECF opportunities with audited financial statements are more likely to be funded and this effect is amplified when prevention-focused investors view a pitch that emphasizes caution. This research is important because it is the first to explore how these factors influence equity crowdfunding decisions. The principal implication of this study is that getting an audit could boost investor confidence, especially if the investor and pitch are focused on safety and security Overall, this study demonstrates how assurance services and investor mindsets shape the crowdfunding landscape.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 121 条
  • [1] Understanding regulatory fit
    Aaker, JL
    Lee, AY
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2006, 43 (01) : 15 - 19
  • [2] Signaling in Equity Crowdfunding
    Ahlers, Gerrit K. C.
    Cumming, Douglas
    Guenther, Christina
    Schweizer, Denis
    [J]. ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2015, 39 (04) : 955 - 980
  • [3] Arora K., 2021, Forbes
  • [4] Investors', Auditors', and Lenders' Understanding of the Message Conveyed by the Standard Audit Report on the Financial Statements
    Asare, Stephen Kwaku
    Wright, Arnold M.
    [J]. ACCOUNTING HORIZONS, 2012, 26 (02) : 193 - 217
  • [5] How regulatory fit affects value in consumer choices and opinions
    Avnet, T
    Higgins, ET
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2006, 43 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [6] Exporting social psychology: Effects of attractiveness on perceptions of entrepreneurs, their ideas for new products, and their financial success
    Baron, RA
    Markman, GD
    Bollinger, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 36 (02) : 467 - 492
  • [7] The timing of initial public offerings
    Benninga, S
    Helmantel, M
    Sarig, O
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 75 (01) : 115 - 132
  • [8] Bhid AV., 2000, The origin and evolution of new businesses, DOI [10.1093/oso/9780195131444.001.0001, DOI 10.1093/OSO/9780195131444.001.0001]
  • [9] Skirting the Issues: Experimental Evidence of Gender Bias in IPO Prospectus Evaluations
    Bigelow, Lyda
    Lundmark, Leif
    Parks, Judi McLean
    Wuebker, Robert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2014, 40 (06) : 1732 - 1759
  • [10] The Role of Assurance in Equity Crowdfunding
    Bogdani, Evisa
    Causholli, Monika
    Knechel, W. Robert
    [J]. ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2022, 97 (02) : 51 - 76