Environmental regulation and labor demand: Evidence from China's air pollution prevention and Control Action Plan

被引:1
作者
Qin, Fen [1 ]
Liu, Zhe [2 ]
机构
[1] Cent Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Wuzi Univ, Sch Econ, Beijing 101149, Peoples R China
关键词
Environmental regulation; Labor demand; APPCAP; Output effect; Factor substitution effect; CLIMATE POLICY; IMPACT; JOBS;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33310
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In response to environmental regulatory pressure from the government, enterprises - as the main employers of labor - adjust their production-related choices and may alter their demand for labor. Numerous researches have probed into how environmental regulations affect the labor demand, which has emerged as a significant concern in the discourse around the adoption of environmental regulation policies. Nonetheless, many researches predominantly concentrates on the evaluation on the effects of environmental regulations on economic and environmental levels. Moreover, rare attention has been paid to how environmental regulations affect social activities, especially in terms of labor demands. As a result, the Air Pollution Prevention and Control Action Plan (APPCAP) is adopted as a "quasi-natural experiment" and a difference-in-differences model is employed to analyze the effects of the APPCAP on labor demands of companies. Hence, the 2008-2020 panel data are considered for the 3,949 Chinese A-share listed enterprises. Furthermore, this paper probes deeply into the underlying mechanisms based on mediation models. The following findings are thus concluded: (1) The labor demands of enterprises can be remarkably increased by APPCAP; and the result is still persuasive even though the endogeneity issues are taken into account. (2) APPCAP improves enterprise labor demand through the output and factor substitution effects. (3) As evidently revealed by heterogeneity analysis, the APPCAP could significant positive affect the labor demand size in state-owned companies, large-scale companies, new companies, and companies in polluting industries. (4) The APPCAP strikingly boosts the demand for labor force with high skills. Nevertheless, it exerts little influence on the demand for labor force with low skills and company salary levels. Therefore, the government must continue to steadfastly implement environmental regulatory policies but adopt different policies based on enterprise characteristics. Overall, this study provides micro-level experimental evidence for more in-depth understanding of how environmental policies affect labor market, which is particularly important for actively resolving social employment problems and exploring new growth points in enterprise employment.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Big Bad Banks? The Winners and Losers from Bank Deregulation in the United States
    Beck, Thorsten
    Levine, Ross
    Levkov, Alexey
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2010, 65 (05) : 1637 - 1667
  • [2] Environmental regulation and labor demand: evidence from the South Coast Air Basin
    Berman, E
    Bui, LTM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2001, 79 (02) : 265 - 295
  • [3] Broner F., 2012, NBER Working Papers
  • [4] Brown R.S., 1981, Modeling and Measuring Natural Resource Substitution, P209
  • [5] The impact of the "Air Pollution Prevention and Control Action Plan" on PM2.5 concentrations in Jing-Jin-Ji region during 2012-2020
    Cai, Siyi
    Wang, Yangjun
    Zhao, Bin
    Wang, Shuxiao
    Chang, Xing
    Hao, Jiming
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 580 : 197 - 209
  • [6] Does environmental regulation drive away inbound foreign direct investment? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
    Cai, Xiqian
    Lu, Yi
    Wu, Mingqin
    Yu, Linhui
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2016, 123 : 73 - 85
  • [7] Stringent environmental regulation and inconsistent green innovation behavior: Evidence from air pollution prevention and control action plan in China
    Cheng, Yuanyuan
    Du, Kerui
    Yao, Xin
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2023, 120
  • [8] Who Loses under Cap-and-Trade Programs? The Labor Market Effects of the NOx Budget Trading Program
    Curtis, E. Mark
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2018, 100 (01) : 151 - 166
  • [9] Deschênes O, 2012, NBER CONF R, P37
  • [10] China's rising IQ (Innovation Quotient) and growth: Firm-level evidence
    Fang, Jing
    He, Hui
    Li, Nan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2020, 147