Effectiveness of the Attachment Design and Thickness of Clear Aligners during Orthodontic Anterior Retraction: Finite Element Analysis

被引:8
作者
Alhasyimi, Ananto Ali [1 ]
Ayub, Aulia
Farmasyanti, Cendrawasih Andusyana [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gadjah Mada, Fac Dent, Dept Orthodont, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia
关键词
attachment; clear aligner; force; orthodontic; retraction; thickness;
D O I
10.1055/s-0043-1761452
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective Clear aligner treatment (CAT) provides orthodontic patients with a comfortable treatment alternative; however, this device has limited capacity to facilitate tooth movements. Although composite attachment has been proposed to facilitate tooth displacement, some of its aspects, such as aligner thickness, can influence CAT's precision. This work aimed to compare the stress distribution patterns produced by clear aligners with different thicknesses and composite attachment shapes during anterior retraction. Materials and Methods Maxillary models consisting of clear aligners, maxillary teeth, and various attachments to the upper central incisor's labial surface were generated. Three models were built to mimic the retraction of the upper central incisors. Each had a distinct attachment design (rectangular attachment, ellipsoid attachment, and pyramidal attachment) and various aligner thicknesses (0.75, 0.85, 0.95, 1.05, and 1.15 mm). Upper central incisor retraction was accomplished using clear aligners. Finite element analysis was used to examine the built models. Stress distribution pattern was examined. Results The greater the thickness of the aligner, the higher the stress experienced by the teeth. The 0.75 mm-thick aligner induces the lightest stress with a minimum of 0.0037623 MPa and a maximum of 0.32859 MPa. Meanwhile, the 1.5 mm-thick aligner has the highest stress with a minimum of 0.004679 MPa and a maximum of 0.43858 MPa. The force distribution on rectangular attachments appears evenly distributed. The maximum pressure force on rectangular attachments has a minimum of 0.38828 MPa, which is smaller than the maximum on ellipsoid and pyramidal attachments at 0.40933 and 0.45099 MPa, respectively. Conclusion The best aligner thickness is 0.75 to 0.85 mm for anterior retraction. An aligner with 0.95 mm thickness can still be used when a remarkable amount of tooth movement force is needed; however, this exception is only applicable to a limited number of clear aligner trays. The ellipsoid attachment is the best type of attachment because the resulting force is substantial and evenly distributed.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 181
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Alhasyimi Ananto Ali, 2019, Eur J Dent, V13, P629, DOI 10.1055/s-0039-3401440
  • [2] Does Clear Aligner Treatment Result in Different Patient Perceptions of Treatment Process and Outcomes Compared to Conventional/Traditional Fixed Appliance Treatment: A Literature Review
    Ben Gassem, Afnan A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2022, 16 (02) : 274 - 285
  • [3] Load Response of Periodontal Ligament: Assessment of Fluid Flow, Compressibility, and Effect of Pore Pressure
    Bergomi, Marzio
    Wiskott, H. W. Anselm
    Botsis, John
    Mellal, Aissa
    Belser, Urs C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2010, 132 (01):
  • [4] Accuracy evaluation of orthodontic movements with aligners: a prospective observational study
    Bilello, G.
    Fazio, M.
    Amato, E.
    Crivello, L.
    Galvano, A.
    Curro, G.
    [J]. PROGRESS IN ORTHODONTICS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [5] Comparative study of three composite materials in bonding attachments for clear aligners
    Chen, Wener
    Qian, Liwen
    Qian, Yufen
    Zhang, Zhechen
    Wen, Xin
    [J]. ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2021, 24 (04) : 520 - 527
  • [6] Costa Rafael, 2020, Dental Press J. Orthod., V25, P46
  • [7] Goto M, 2017, ORTHOD WAVES, V76, P207, DOI 10.1016/j.odw.2017.09.001
  • [8] The difference of stress distribution of maxillary expansion using rapid maxillary expander (RME) and maxillary skeletal expander (MSE)-a finite element analysis
    Hartono, Nathania
    Soegiharto, Benny M.
    Widayati, Retno
    [J]. PROGRESS IN ORTHODONTICS, 2018, 19
  • [9] Maxillary anterior en masse retraction using different antero-posterior position of mini screw: a 3D finite element study
    Hedayati, Zohreh
    Shomali, Mehrdad
    [J]. PROGRESS IN ORTHODONTICS, 2016, 17 : 31
  • [10] Periodontal ligament hydrostatic pressure with areas of root resorption after application of a continuous torque moment - A study using identical extracted maxillary human premolars
    Hohmann, Ansgar
    Wolfram, Uwe
    Geiger, Martin
    Boryor, Andrew
    Sander, Christian
    Faltin, Rolf
    Faltin, Kurt
    Sander, Franz Guenter
    [J]. ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2007, 77 (04) : 653 - 659