Feasibility and safety of a novel plastic stent designed specifically for endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage

被引:0
作者
Fukuda, Soma [1 ]
Hijioka, Susumu [1 ]
Nagashio, Yoshikuni [1 ]
Maruki, Yuta [1 ]
Ohba, Akihiro [1 ]
Agarie, Daiki [1 ]
Hagiwara, Yuya [1 ]
Hara, Hidenobu [1 ]
Okamoto, Kohei [1 ]
Yamashige, Daiki [1 ]
Yagi, Shin [1 ]
Kuwada, Masaru [1 ]
Chatto, Mark [1 ,2 ]
Kondo, Shunsuke [1 ]
Morizane, Chigusa [1 ]
Ueno, Hideki [1 ]
Saito, Yutaka [3 ]
Okusaka, Takuji [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Canc Ctr, Dept Hepatobiliary & Pancreat Oncol, 5-1-1 Tsukiji Chuo Ku, Tokyo 1040045, Japan
[2] Makati Med Ctr, Dept Med, Makati, Philippines
[3] Natl Canc Ctr, Endoscopy Div, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
Pancreatobiliary (ERCP/PTCD); Strictures; Endoscopic ultrasonography; Pancreas; Intervention EUS; FAILED ERCP; OUTCOMES; MULTICENTER;
D O I
10.1055/a-2294-8517
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and study aims Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage (EUS-PD) is emerging as an effective alternative treatment for obstructive pancreatitis after unsuccessful endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP). However, the high incidence of adverse events associated with EUS-PD (approximately 20%) remains an issue. Recently, we developed a novel plastic stent for EUS-PD, with a radiopaque marker positioned at approximately one-third of the length from the distal end of the stent and side holes positioned exclusively distal to the marker. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of using this stent in EUS-PD. Patients and methods We retrospectively reviewed data from 10 patients who underwent EUS-PD with the novel plastic stent at the National Cancer Center Hospital between March 2021 and October 2023. Technical and clinical success, procedure times, adverse events (AEs), recurrent pancreatic duct obstruction (RPO), and time to RPO were assessed. Results Of the 10 patients, five had postoperative benign pancreaticojejunal anastomotic strictures and five had malignant pancreatic duct obstruction. The technical and clinical success rates were both 100% (10/10). An AE (self-limited abdominal pain) occurred in one patient (10.0%). Two patients (20.0%) died of their primary disease during the follow-up period (median, 44 days; range, 25-272 days). The incidence of RPO was 10.0% (1/10), and the 3-month non-RPO rate was 83.3%. Conclusions The novel plastic stent shows potential as a useful and safe tool in EUS-PD.
引用
收藏
页码:E715 / E722
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] EUS guided pancreatic duct decompression in surgically altered anatomy or failed ERCP-A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression
    Bhurwal, Abhishek
    Tawadros, Augustine
    Mutneja, Hemant
    Gjeorgjievski, Mihajlo
    Shah, Ishani
    Bansal, Vikas
    Patel, Anish
    Sarkar, Avik
    Bartel, Michal
    Brahmbhatt, Bhaumik
    [J]. PANCREATOLOGY, 2021, 21 (05) : 990 - 1000
  • [2] Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography: When should we do it?
    Bor, Renata
    Madacsy, Laszlo
    Fabian, Anna
    Szepes, Attila
    Szepes, Zoltan
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 7 (11): : 1023 - 1031
  • [3] Efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage (EUS-PDD): A systematic review and meta-analysis of 714 patients
    Chandan, Saurabh
    Mohan, Babu P.
    Khan, Shahab R.
    Kassab, Lena L.
    Ponnada, Suresh
    Ofosu, Andrew
    Bhat, Ishfaq
    Singh, Shailender
    Adler, Douglas G.
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2020, 08 (11) : E1664 - E1672
  • [4] An international multicenter study comparing EUS-guided pancreatic duct drainage with enteroscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde pancreatography after Whipple surgery
    Chen, Yen-I
    Levy, Michael J.
    Moreels, Tom G.
    Hajijeva, Gulara
    Will, Uwe
    Artifon, Everson L.
    Hara, Kazuo
    Kitano, Masayuki
    Topazian, Mark
    Abu Dayyeh, Barham
    Reichel, Andreas
    Vilela, Tiago
    Ngamruengphong, Saowanee
    Haito-Chavez, Yamile
    Bukhari, Majidah
    Okolo, Patrick, III
    Kumbhari, Vivek
    Ismail, Amr
    Khashab, Mouen A.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 85 (01) : 170 - 177
  • [5] A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop
    Cotton, Peter B.
    Eisen, Glenn M.
    Aabakken, Lars
    Baron, Todd H.
    Hutter, Matt M.
    Jacobson, Brian C.
    Mergener, Klaus
    Nemcek, Albert, Jr.
    Petersen, Bret T.
    Petrini, John L.
    Pike, Irving M.
    Rabeneck, Linda
    Romagnuolo, Joseph
    Vargo, John J.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 71 (03) : 446 - 454
  • [6] Six-year retrospective analysis of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided pancreatic ductal interventions at a tertiary referral center
    Dalal, Ankit
    Patil, Gaurav
    Maydeo, Amit
    [J]. DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2020, 32 (03) : 409 - 416
  • [7] Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transluminal drainage of pancreatic duct obstruction: long-term outcome
    Ergun, M.
    Aouattah, T.
    Gillain, C.
    Gigot, J. -F.
    Hubert, C.
    Deprez, P. H.
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2011, 43 (06) : 518 - 525
  • [8] EUS-guided pancreaticogastrostomy
    François, E
    Kahaleh, M
    Giovannini, M
    Matos, C
    Devière, J
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 56 (01) : 128 - 133
  • [9] EUS-guided pancreatic duct intervention: outcomes of a single tertiary-care referral center experience
    Fujii, Larissa L.
    Topazian, Mark D.
    Abu Dayyeh, Barham K.
    Baron, Todd H.
    Chari, Suresh T.
    Farnell, Michael B.
    Gleeson, Ferga C.
    Gostout, Christopher J.
    Kendrick, Michael L.
    Pearson, Randall K.
    Petersen, Bret T.
    Truty, Mark J.
    Vege, Santhi S.
    Levy, Michael J.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2013, 78 (06) : 854 - +
  • [10] Novel and safe plastic stent exchange method after endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with incomplete fistula (side hole method)
    Hijioka, Susumu
    Sakamoto, Yasunari
    Nagashio, Yoshikuni
    Maruki, Yuta
    Okusaka, Takuji
    Saito, Yutaka
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 55 : E24 - E25