Agent-Based Modeling and Simulation of Project Schedule Risk Analysis in the Construction Industry

被引:0
作者
ElGindi, Mohamed [1 ]
Harb, Sara [1 ]
Abdullah, Abdelhamid [1 ,2 ]
Essawy, Yasmeen A. S. [1 ,3 ]
Nassar, Khaled [4 ]
机构
[1] Amer Univ Cairo, Dept Construct Engn, New Cairo, Egypt
[2] Helwan Univ, Dept Architectural Engn, Fac Engn Mataria, Helwan, Egypt
[3] Ain Shams Univ ASU, Dept Struct Engn, Cairo, Egypt
[4] Amer Univ Cairo AUC, Dept Construct Engn, Ind Partnerships & Extended Educ, New Cairo, Egypt
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CANADIAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING ANNUAL CONFERENCE 2022, VOL 1, CSCE 2022 | 2023年 / 363卷
关键词
Agent-based modelling; Project schedule risk analysis; PERFORMANCE; DELAY;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-34593-7_31
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The risk of project delay is a common phenomenon with an adverse effect on the performance of projects in the construction sector. The effect of its negative impacts in terms of cost overruns, reduced quality, and productivity extends to the owner, consultant, and contractor. The goal of this paper is to introduce an agent-based simulation model for the risk analysis of the project schedule component of construction projects, based on three risk management decisions. In the simulated model, the authors indicate four main phases in the construction process, along with their approval stages: (1) handing over; (2) engineering; (3) procurement; and (4) construction, which are commonly subjected to delays in the completion of the required activities. In addition, the developed simulation model should allow decision-makers to explore the impact of risks on the project schedule, in terms of schedule and cost overrun, based on two risk-response controls: acceptance or mitigation. As such, three simulation models are formulated: (A) no risks; (B) with risks; and (C) with mitigation. The model has been run based on a 70% mitigation value. The results indicate rational values. Since the duration for the risks for the 'with risk' scenario resulted in the highest time, followed by the 'with mitigation' scenario, the lowest time is recorded for the 'no risks'. Similarly, the highest cost is recorded for the 'with mitigation' scenario, followed by the 'with risks', ending with the 'no risks' scenario. Further validation tools signified the effectiveness of the mitigation decision on the recorded results. This is demonstrated by the sudden drop as the mitigation value has been decreased based on the user's input.
引用
收藏
页码:493 / 511
页数:19
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Risk Management in the Construction Industry Using Combined Fuzzy FMEA and Fuzzy AHP [J].
Abdelgawad, Mohamed ;
Fayek, Aminah Robinson .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 136 (09) :1028-1036
[2]   STATISTICAL PROPERTIES OF CONSTRUCTION DURATION DATA [J].
ABOURIZK, SM ;
HALPIN, DW .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 1992, 118 (03) :525-544
[3]  
Agarwal AL, 2017, Int J Sci Technol, V3, P104
[4]  
Aibinu A.A., 2002, INT J PROJ MANAG, V20, P593, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00028-5
[5]   Causes of delay in large construction projects [J].
Construction Engineering and Management Department, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Box # 680, Dhahran, 31261, Saudi Arabia .
Int. J. Proj. Manage., 2006, 4 (349-357) :349-357
[6]   Ranking of delay factors in construction projects after Egyptian revolution [J].
Aziz, Remon Fayek .
ALEXANDRIA ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2013, 52 (03) :387-406
[7]   Applying lean thinking in construction and performance improvement [J].
Aziz, Remon Fayek ;
Hafez, Sherif Mohamed .
ALEXANDRIA ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2013, 52 (04) :679-695
[8]   Shielding production: Essential step in production control [J].
Ballard, G ;
Howell, G .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 1998, 124 (01) :11-17
[9]  
Baloi D., 2003, International Journal of Project Management, V21, P261, DOI 10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00017-0
[10]   Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems [J].
Bonabeau, E .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2002, 99 :7280-7287