Bridging cognitive neuroscience and education: Insights from EEG recording during mathematical proof evaluation

被引:2
作者
Gashaj, Venera [1 ,2 ]
Trninic, Dragan [2 ,3 ]
Formaz, Clea [2 ]
Tobler, Samuel [2 ]
Gomez-Canon, Juan Sebastian [4 ]
Poikonen, Hanna [2 ]
Kapur, Manu [2 ]
机构
[1] Loughborough Univ, Sch Sci, Loughborough, England
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Learning Sci & Higher Educ, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Human Factored Design, Steamboat Springs, CO USA
[4] Univ Pompeu Fabra, Mus Technol Grp, Barcelona, Spain
来源
TRENDS IN NEUROSCIENCE AND EDUCATION | 2024年 / 35卷
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Mathematical reasoning; Symbolic; Non-symbolic; Oscillatory dynamics; EEG (Electroencephalogram); Mathematics Education; HUMAN BRAIN; PARIETAL; OSCILLATIONS; ATTENTION; NUMBERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.tine.2024.100226
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Background: Much of modern mathematics education prioritizes symbolic formalism even at the expense of nonsymbolic intuition, we contextualize our study in the ongoing debates on the balance between symbolic and nonsymbolic reasoning. We explore the dissociation of oscillatory dynamics between algebraic (symbolic) and geometric (non-symbolic) processing in advanced mathematical reasoning during a naturalistic design. Method: Employing mobile EEG technology, we investigated students' beta and gamma wave patterns over frontal and parietal regions while they engaged with mathematical demonstrations in symbolic and non-symbolic formats within a tutor-student framework. We used extended, naturalistic stimuli to approximate an authentic educational setting. Conclusion: Our findings reveal nuanced distinctions in neural processing, particularly in terms of gamma waves and activity in parietal regions. Furthermore, no clear overall format preference emerged from the neuroscientific perspective despite students rating symbolic demonstrations higher for understanding and familiarity.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [1] Allen K.R., 2023, USING GAMES UNDERSTA, DOI [10.31234/osf.io/hbsvj, DOI 10.31234/OSF.IO/HBSVJ]
  • [2] Does the parietal cortex distinguish between "10," "ten," and ten dots?
    Ansari, Daniel
    [J]. NEURON, 2007, 53 (02) : 165 - 167
  • [3] Brain areas associated with numbers and calculations in children: Meta-analyses of fMRI studies
    Arsalidou, Marie
    Pawliw-Levac, Matthew
    Sadeghi, Mahsa
    Pascual-Leone, Juan
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 30 : 239 - 250
  • [4] Is 2+2=4? Meta-analyses of brain areas needed for numbers and calculations
    Arsalidou, Marie
    Taylor, Margot J.
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2011, 54 (03) : 2382 - 2393
  • [5] Separating stages of arithmetic verification: An ERP study with a novel paradigm
    Avancini, Chiara
    Soltesz, Fruzsina
    Szucs, Denes
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2015, 75 : 322 - 329
  • [6] The psychophysics toolbox
    Brainard, DH
    [J]. SPATIAL VISION, 1997, 10 (04): : 433 - 436
  • [7] Empowerment contributes to exploration behaviour in a creative video game
    Brandle, Franziska
    Stocks, Lena J.
    Tenenbaum, Joshua B.
    Gershman, Samuel J.
    Schulz, Eric
    [J]. NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR, 2023, 7 (09) : 1481 - 1489
  • [8] Neural correlates of social and nonsocial emotions: An fMRI study
    Britton, Jennifer C.
    Phan, K. Luan
    Taylor, Stephan F.
    Welsh, Robert C.
    Berridge, Kent C.
    Liberzon, I.
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2006, 31 (01) : 397 - 409
  • [9] Distinct patterns of brain oscillations underlie two basic parameters of human maze learning
    Caplan, JB
    Madsen, JR
    Raghavachari, S
    Kahana, MJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 86 (01) : 368 - 380
  • [10] Algebra dissociates from arithmetic in the brain semantic network
    Cheng, Dazhi
    Li, Mengyi
    Cui, Jiaxin
    Wang, Li
    Wang, Naiyi
    Ouyang, Liangyuan
    Wang, Xiaozhuang
    Bai, Xuejun
    Zhou, Xinlin
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN FUNCTIONS, 2022, 18 (01)