Intralesional curettage and surgical adjuvants in the treatment of giant cell tumor of bone: meta-analysis and systematic review

被引:1
|
作者
Leng, Ao [1 ]
Gao, Haojie [2 ]
Li, Jiacheng [1 ]
Meng, Lingzhi [1 ]
Wang, Qi [1 ]
Xiang, Liangbi [1 ]
机构
[1] Gen Hosp Northern Theater Command, Dept Orthopaed, 83 Wenhua Rd, Shenyang 110016, Peoples R China
[2] 971st Hosp CPLA Navy, Dept Hand Surg, Qingdao, Peoples R China
关键词
Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB); curettage; high-speed burring (HSB); chemical agent; polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA); LOCAL RECURRENCE; LONG BONES; RISK-FACTORS; CEMENT; PHENOL; DENOSUMAB;
D O I
10.21037/cco-23-138
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The ideal treatment for giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is still controversial. Various surgical adjuvants have been introduced following intralesional curettage to improve local control rates. However, findings from relevant studies are inconsistent, and no consensus has been reached. The purpose of this study is to determine what intraoperative adjuvant is effective in decreasing the recurrence of GCTB. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of articles published in the PubMed electronic database which assessed the recurrence rate of GCTB following intralesional curettage with or without various surgical adjuvants. Two authors independently evaluated all publications. Meta-analysis was performed with Stata/MP (Version 17.0, StataCorp LLC, TX, USA) and Review Manager (RevMan, Version 5.4.1, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2020). Pooled risk ratio (RR) was used for analysis, with P values less than 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Twenty-four studies involving 2,579 patients were included in this analysis. The overall recurrence rates for patients treated with or without high-speed burring (HSB) are 11.9% (26/218) and 47.7% (92/193), respectively. The pooled RR for tumor recurrence is 0.33 (95% CI: 0.22 to 0.49, P<0.001). In the meanwhile, the overall recurrence rates for patients treated with or without chemical adjuvants are 23.5% (77/328) and 26.1% (73/280), respectively, with a pooled RR of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.63 to 1.10, P=0.89). Additionally, the overall recurrence rates for patients treated with or without polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) are 20.4% (205/1,006) and 33.4% (314/939), respectively, with a pooled RR of 0.59 (95% CI: 0.50 to 0.69, P<0.001). Conclusions: Intraoperative application of HSB or PMMA has an additional antitumor effect, while the use of phenol or H2O2 fails to make any significant difference (PROSPERO: CRD42022344262).
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] EFFECT OF INTRALESIONAL CURETTAGE AND CEMENTATION IN THE TREATMENT OF GIANT CELL TUMOUR AROUND KNEE AND ANKLE JOINTS
    Yadav, Surendra Singh
    Anand, Rao
    Shelendra, Saiyam
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2016, 5 (72): : 5311 - 5314
  • [32] Treatment of locally aggressive benign bone tumors by means of extended intralesional curettage without chemical adjuvants
    Yenigul, Ali Erkan
    Sofulu, Omer
    Erol, Bulent
    SAGE OPEN MEDICINE, 2022, 10
  • [33] Laying open (deroofing) and curettage of sinus as treatment of pilonidal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Garg, Pankaj
    Menon, Geetha R.
    Gupta, Vikas
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 86 (1-2) : 27 - 33
  • [34] Adjuvant treatment with zoledronic acid after extensive curettage for giant cell tumours of bone
    Gouin, Francois
    Rochwerger, Alexandre R.
    Di Marco, Antonio
    Rosset, Philippe
    Bonnevialle, Paul
    Fiorenza, Fabrice
    Anract, Philippe
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 50 (14) : 2425 - 2431
  • [35] Similar local recurrence but better function with curettage versus resection for bone giant cell tumor and pathological fracture at presentation
    Tsukamoto, Shinji
    Mavrogenis, Andreas F.
    Tanzi, Piergiuseppe
    Leone, Giulio
    Righi, Alberto
    Akahane, Manabu
    Kido, Akira
    Honoki, Kanya
    Tanaka, Yasuhito
    Donati, Davide Maria
    Errani, Costantino
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 119 (07) : 864 - 872
  • [36] Giant cell tumor of bone: Effect of different surgical techniques and adjuvants on local recurrence rate
    A. Gambini
    L. Di Giorgio
    M. Valeo
    R. Trinchi
    M. Marzolini
    M. Mastantuono
    Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 2003, 4 (3) : 126 - 132
  • [37] Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: Review, Mimics, and New Developments in Treatment
    Chakarun, Corey J.
    Forrester, Deborah M.
    Gottsegen, Christopher J.
    Patel, Dakshesh B.
    White, Eric A.
    Matcuk, George R., Jr.
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2013, 33 (01) : 197 - 211
  • [38] Which Treatment is the Best for Giant Cell Tumors of the Distal Radius? A Meta-analysis
    Liu, Yu-peng
    Li, Kang-hua
    Sun, Bu-hua
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2012, 470 (10) : 2886 - 2894
  • [39] Retrospective investigation of "paint brush borders" sign in association with local recurrence of giant cell tumor of bone after intralesional curettage
    He, Yifeng
    Wang, Jun
    Rui, Weiwei
    Lin, Juiming
    Yuan, Fei
    Du, Lianjun
    Zhang, Ji
    Ding, Xiaoyi
    JOURNAL OF BONE ONCOLOGY, 2018, 10 : 41 - 48
  • [40] Zoledronic acid-loaded bone cement as a local adjuvant therapy for giant cell tumor of the sacrum after intralesional curettage
    Kun-Hui Chen
    Po-Kuei Wu
    Cheng-Fong Chen
    Wei-Ming Chen
    European Spine Journal, 2015, 24 : 2182 - 2188