Intralesional curettage and surgical adjuvants in the treatment of giant cell tumor of bone: meta-analysis and systematic review

被引:1
|
作者
Leng, Ao [1 ]
Gao, Haojie [2 ]
Li, Jiacheng [1 ]
Meng, Lingzhi [1 ]
Wang, Qi [1 ]
Xiang, Liangbi [1 ]
机构
[1] Gen Hosp Northern Theater Command, Dept Orthopaed, 83 Wenhua Rd, Shenyang 110016, Peoples R China
[2] 971st Hosp CPLA Navy, Dept Hand Surg, Qingdao, Peoples R China
关键词
Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB); curettage; high-speed burring (HSB); chemical agent; polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA); LOCAL RECURRENCE; LONG BONES; RISK-FACTORS; CEMENT; PHENOL; DENOSUMAB;
D O I
10.21037/cco-23-138
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The ideal treatment for giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is still controversial. Various surgical adjuvants have been introduced following intralesional curettage to improve local control rates. However, findings from relevant studies are inconsistent, and no consensus has been reached. The purpose of this study is to determine what intraoperative adjuvant is effective in decreasing the recurrence of GCTB. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of articles published in the PubMed electronic database which assessed the recurrence rate of GCTB following intralesional curettage with or without various surgical adjuvants. Two authors independently evaluated all publications. Meta-analysis was performed with Stata/MP (Version 17.0, StataCorp LLC, TX, USA) and Review Manager (RevMan, Version 5.4.1, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2020). Pooled risk ratio (RR) was used for analysis, with P values less than 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Twenty-four studies involving 2,579 patients were included in this analysis. The overall recurrence rates for patients treated with or without high-speed burring (HSB) are 11.9% (26/218) and 47.7% (92/193), respectively. The pooled RR for tumor recurrence is 0.33 (95% CI: 0.22 to 0.49, P<0.001). In the meanwhile, the overall recurrence rates for patients treated with or without chemical adjuvants are 23.5% (77/328) and 26.1% (73/280), respectively, with a pooled RR of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.63 to 1.10, P=0.89). Additionally, the overall recurrence rates for patients treated with or without polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) are 20.4% (205/1,006) and 33.4% (314/939), respectively, with a pooled RR of 0.59 (95% CI: 0.50 to 0.69, P<0.001). Conclusions: Intraoperative application of HSB or PMMA has an additional antitumor effect, while the use of phenol or H2O2 fails to make any significant difference (PROSPERO: CRD42022344262).
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Denosumab regimens in the treatment of giant cell tumor of bone: A systematic review with meta-analysis
    Barreto, Bruno G.
    Santili, Claudio
    Guedes, Alex
    Moreira, Fernando D.
    Paz, Claudio Luiz D. S. L.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF ORTHOPEDICS, 2025, 16 (03):
  • [2] Effect of bisphosphonates on local recurrence of giant cell tumor of bone: a meta-analysis
    Shi, Mingmin
    Chen, Lei
    Wang, Yangxin
    Wang, Wei
    Zhang, Yujie
    Yan, Shigui
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2019, 11 : 669 - 680
  • [3] Preoperative Denosumab may increase the Risk of Local Recurrence of Giant-cell Tumor of Bone Treated with Curettage: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Zhao, Yongzhao
    Cai, Zhenyu
    Tang, Xiaodong
    Du, Zhiye
    Yang, Yi
    Guo, Wei
    JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2021, 12 (02): : 508 - 517
  • [4] Mid-term results of intralesional extended curettage, cauterization, and polymethylmethacrylate cementation in the treatment of giant cell tumor of bone: A retrospective case series
    Sirin, Evrim
    Akgulle, Ahmet Hamdi
    Topkar, Osman Mert
    Sofulu, Omer
    Baykan, Said Erkam
    Erol, Bulent
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA, 2020, 54 (05) : 524 - 529
  • [5] THE ROLE OF BONE GRAFTING VS. BONE CEMENT IN THE TREATMENT OF GIANT CELL TUMOR OF BONE A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Risk of Recurrence in 1,454 Patients
    Costello, Joseph P.
    Travis, Levi M.
    Jahn, Jacob
    Pretell-Mazzini, Juan A.
    JBJS REVIEWS, 2024, 12 (09)
  • [6] The Efficacy of Bisphosphonate in the Treatment of Giant Cell Tumour of the Bone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Deslivia, M. F.
    Savio, S.
    Wiratnaya, I. G. E.
    Astawa, P.
    Sandiwidayat, K. S.
    Bimantara, N. G.
    MALAYSIAN ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL, 2023, 17 (01) : 98 - 110
  • [7] Denosumab for Effective Tumor Size Reduction in Patients With Giant Cell Tumors of the Bone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yayan, Josef
    CANCER CONTROL, 2020, 27 (03)
  • [8] Denosumab treatment for giant-cell tumor of bone: a systematic review of the literature
    Luengo-Alonso, Gonzalo
    Mellado-Romero, Maria
    Shemesh, Shai
    Ramos-Pascua, Luis
    Pretell-Mazzini, Juan
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2019, 139 (10) : 1339 - 1349
  • [9] Treatment of Recurrent Giant Cell Tumor of Bones: A Systematic Review
    Pitsilos, Charalampos
    Givissis, Panagiotis
    Papadopoulos, Pericles
    Chalidis, Byron
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (13)
  • [10] Giant cell tumor of the femoral head and neck: result of intralesional curettage
    Cho, Hwan Seong
    Park, Il-Hyung
    Han, Ilkyu
    Kang, Seung Chul
    Kim, Han-Soo
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2010, 130 (11) : 1329 - 1333