A decision-making framework for determinants of an organisation's readiness for smart warehouse

被引:4
作者
Ali, Sadia Samar [1 ]
Kaur, Rajbir [2 ]
Gupta, Himanshu [3 ]
Ahmad, Zulfiqar [1 ]
Jebahi, Khaled [1 ]
机构
[1] King Abdulaziz Univ, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[2] Govt Girls Coll Panchkula Haryana, Panchkula 134001, India
[3] Indian Inst Technol, Indian Sch Mines, Dept Management, Dhanbad, India
关键词
Intelligent logistics; industrial development; smart warehouse; decision-making framework; TOE; emerging economy; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; BIG DATA ANALYTICS; INDUSTRY; 4.0; OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT; DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION; TECHNOLOGY; CHALLENGES; DESIGN; IMPLEMENTATION; BUSINESS;
D O I
10.1080/09537287.2024.2372359
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Demanding, competitive business dynamics drive organisations to continually evaluate and adopt automation in their structural setups, particularly warehouses, for growth and profitability. Industry 4.0 technologies are revolutionising warehouse operations, resulting in cost savings, increased efficiency, and a more environmentally friendly approach for businesses. The readiness of organisations to adopt these technologies is evaluated with the help of hard and soft determinants selected through a theoretical framework of Technology-Organisation-Environment (TOE). In this study, a unique method is used that combines the Modified Delphi method, content validity for scale validation, expert opinion consensus tests for agreement, ranking determinants using the Best Worst Method (BWM), and rank validation through sensitivity analysis for warehousing industry experts and organisations. Warehouse service providers who convert their warehouses into smart modes to serve fast-moving consumer goods companies in Tier-2 cities are chosen for the structural framework. Results present the role of the 'operational efficiency of technology', 'top management', 'employee's education', and 'technical background' as the most effective driving determinants. This research provides valuable information to researchers and managers trying to upgrade their warehouse into a smart warehouse.
引用
收藏
页码:1887 / 1908
页数:22
相关论文
共 73 条
[51]   Evaluating firms' R & D performance using best worst method [J].
Salimi, Negin ;
Rezaei, Jafar .
EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 2018, 66 :147-155
[52]   Managerial challenges of Industry 4.0: an empirically backed research agenda for a nascent field [J].
Schneider, Paul .
REVIEW OF MANAGERIAL SCIENCE, 2018, 12 (03) :803-848
[53]   Capturing the benefits of industry 4.0: a business network perspective [J].
Schroeder, Andreas ;
Bigdeli, Ali Ziaee ;
Zarcos, Carlos Galera ;
Baines, Tim .
PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2019, 30 (16) :1305-1321
[54]  
Shamn K, 2016, IEEE C EVOL COMPUTAT, P5309, DOI 10.1109/CEC.2016.7748365
[55]   Organizational readiness for implementing change: a psychometric assessment of a new measure [J].
Shea, Christopher M. ;
Jacobs, Sara R. ;
Esserman, Denise A. ;
Bruce, Kerry ;
Weiner, Bryan J. .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2014, 9
[56]   Critical factors for the successful implementation of Industry 4.0: a review and future research direction [J].
Sony, Michael ;
Naik, Subhash .
PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2020, 31 (10) :799-815
[57]   Drivers and barriers for Industry 4.0 readiness and practice: empirical evidence from small and medium-sized manufacturers [J].
Stentoft, Jan ;
Adsboll Wickstrom, Kent ;
Philipsen, Kristian ;
Haug, Anders .
PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2021, 32 (10) :811-828
[58]   Incorporating the environmental dimension in the assessment of automated warehouses [J].
Tappia, Elena ;
Marchet, Gino ;
Melacini, Marco ;
Perotti, Sara .
PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2015, 26 (10) :824-838
[59]   Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance [J].
Teece, David J. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2007, 28 (13) :1319-1350
[60]   Strategic analysis of manufacturer-supplier partnerships: An ANP model for collaborative CO2 reduction management [J].
Theissen, Sebastian ;
Spinler, Stefan .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2014, 233 (02) :383-397