共 50 条
Abortion and mental health outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
被引:1
|作者:
Littell, Julia H.
[1
]
Young, Sarah
[2
]
Pigott, Therese D.
[3
]
Biggs, M. Antonia
[4
]
Munk-Olsen, Trine
[5
]
Steinberg, Julia R.
[6
]
机构:
[1] Bryn Mawr Coll, Grad Sch Social Work & Social Res, Bryn Mawr, PA 19010 USA
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Hunt Lib, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Georgia State Univ, Coll Educ & Human Dev, Atlanta, GA USA
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Med, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Adv New Stand Reprod Hlth, Oakland, CA USA
[5] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Psychiat, Odense, Denmark
[6] Univ Maryland, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Family Sci, College Pk, MD USA
关键词:
abortion;
mental health;
meta-analysis;
systematic review;
ROBUST VARIANCE-ESTIMATION;
MANAGED MEDICATION ABORTION;
UNINTENDED PREGNANCY;
UNITED-STATES;
YOUNG-WOMEN;
DATA EXTRACTION;
DISORDERS;
QUALITY;
COMMON;
CHILDBIRTH;
D O I:
10.1002/cl2.1410
中图分类号:
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号:
03 ;
0303 ;
摘要:
This is a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of research on mental health outcomes of abortion. Does abortion increase the risk of adverse mental health outcomes? That is the central question for this review. Our review aims to inform policy and practice by locating, critically appraising, and synthesizing empirical evidence on associations between abortion and subsequent mental health outcomes. Given the controversies surrounding this topic and the complex social, political, legal, and ideological contexts in which research and reviews on abortion are conducted, it is especially important to conduct this systematic review and meta-analysis with comprehensive, rigorous, unbiased, and transparent methods. We will include a variety of study designs to enhance understanding of studies' methodological strengths and weaknesses and to identify potential explanations for conflicting results. We will follow open science principles, providing access to our methods, measures, and results, and making data available for re-analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文