How start-ups translate learning from innovation failure into strategies for growth

被引:7
作者
Corvello, Vincenzo [1 ]
Troise, Ciro [2 ]
Schiuma, Giovanni [3 ]
Jones, Paul [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Messina, Dept Engn, I-98166 Messina, Italy
[2] Univ Turin, Dept Management, Corso Unione Soviet 218 bis, I-10134 Turin, Italy
[3] LUM Univ Giuseppe, Dept Engn, SS 100 Km 18, I-70010 Bari, Italy
[4] Swansea Univ, Sch Management, Bay Campus,Fabian Way, Swansea SA1 8EN, Wales
关键词
Innovation failure; Start-ups; Organizational learning; Dynamic capabilities; Learning from failures; Business model; DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; ENTREPRENEURSHIP; PERFORMANCE; PROJECT; TECHNOLOGIES; REFLEXIVITY; OPPORTUNITY; DIFFUSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103051
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Start-ups can make a decisive contribution to the development of innovation. These organizations are designed to experiment with new technologies and business models. In their growth process, learning from failure plays a decisive role. This study enriches our understanding of learning from failure, particularly in start-ups, by analyzing 21 innovative start-ups that have faced experiences of failure. The theories of organizational learning and dynamic capabilities are applied to identify the responses of start-ups to failure and their implications in terms of learning. Six response strategies were identified: external monitoring, internal evaluation, resource acquisition and mobilization, value creation and capture, team -level entrepreneurial, and organizational learning. These response strategies are grouped into the three dynamic capabilities dimensions: sensing, seizing, and transforming. These strategies are relevant for start-ups to overcome difficulties and continue their growth and innovation. They also offer a guideline for start-ups to develop strategies for systematic learning from failures.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 106 条
[1]   Learning from the failure: experiences in the Korean telecommunications market [J].
Ahn, JH ;
Kim, MS ;
Lee, DJ .
TECHNOVATION, 2005, 25 (01) :69-82
[2]   SELECTING CORPORATE FIRMS FOR COLLABORATIVE INNOVATION: ENTREPRENEURIAL DECISION MAKING IN ASYMMETRIC PARTNERSHIPS [J].
Allmendinger, Martin P. ;
Berger, Elisabeth S. C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2020, 24 (01)
[3]   Startup size and the mechanisms of external learning: increasing opportunity and decreasing ability? [J].
Almeida, P ;
Dokko, G ;
Rosenkopf, L .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2003, 32 (02) :301-315
[4]  
Argyris C., 1978, ORG LEARNING THEORY
[5]   Why don't all young firms invest in R&D? [J].
Audretsch, David B. ;
Segarra, Agusti ;
Teruel, Mercedes .
SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2014, 43 (04) :751-766
[6]   Identifying contradictions in an incumbent-startup ecosystem-an activity theory approach [J].
Baloutsos, Stratos ;
Karagiannaki, Angeliki ;
Pramatari, Katerina .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2020, 25 (06) :527-548
[7]   Approaches for Organizational Learning: A Literature Review [J].
Basten, Dirk ;
Haamann, Thilo .
SAGE OPEN, 2018, 8 (03)
[8]   Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd [J].
Belleflamme, Paul ;
Lambert, Thomas ;
Schwienbacher, Armin .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2014, 29 (05) :585-609
[9]  
Blanc S., 2010, First Principles
[10]   Knowledge absorptive capacity: New insights for its conceptualization and measurement [J].
Camison, Cesar ;
Fores, Beatriz .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2010, 63 (07) :707-715