Cup-Cage Construct for Treatment of Severe Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes at a Mean Follow-Up of 7.7 Years

被引:0
作者
Chaudhry, Faran [1 ,2 ]
Daud, Anser [2 ,3 ]
Greenberg, Arieh [2 ,3 ]
Braunstein, Doris [2 ]
Safir, Oleg A. [2 ,3 ]
Gross, Allan E. [2 ,3 ]
Kuzyk, Paul R. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Temerty Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Surg, Div Orthopaed Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
revision total hip arthroplasty; acetabular defect; pelvic discontinuity; cup-cage; half cup-cage; PELVIC DISCONTINUITY; COMPONENT; RECONSTRUCTION; DISTRACTION; DEFECTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2024.07.010
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Acetabular reconstruction in the context of massive acetabular bone loss is challenging. Achieving implant stability in these situations requires special considerations. The cup-cage construct is a treatment option that addresses this issue. This study evaluates survivorship, complications, and functional outcomes using the cup-cage construct. Methods: A total of 131 cup-cage implants (129 patients) were identified from our retrospective review of revision total hip arthroplasties from January 2003 to January 2022. Among these cases, 100 (76.3%) were women, the mean age at the time of surgery was 68 years (range, 29 to 92; SD [SD], 12.4), and the mean follow-up was 7.7 years (range, 0.02 to 20.3; SD, 5.1). Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was conducted with failure defined as revision surgery and/or failure of the cup-cage reconstruction. Results: At a mean follow-up of 7.7 years, the cup-cage construct survivorship due to all-cause failure was 83.9% (95% CI [confidence interval]: 77.6 to 90.2) at 5 years with 88 hips at risk, 74.8% (95% CI: 66.2 to 83.4) at 10 years with 38 hips at risk, and 69.8% (95% CI: 59.4 to 80.2) at 15 years with 11 hips at risk. The survivorship due to failure from aseptic loosening was 96.7% (95% CI: 93.6 to 99.8) at 5 years with 88 hips at risk and 95.5% (95% CI: 91.6 to 99.4) at 10 and 15 years with 38 and 11 hips at risk, respectively. The revision rate for aseptic loosening of the cup and/or cage, infection, dislocation, and aseptic loosening of the femoral stem was 5 of 131 (3.8%), 12 of 131 (9.1%), 10 of 131 (7.6%), and 2 of 131 (1.5%). Conclusions: The cup-cage construct is a reliable treatment option for the treatment of various acetabular defects. There are favorable survivorship, clinical, and radiographic outcomes, with a satisfactory complication rate. (c) 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:2555 / 2560
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Trabecular Metal Augments for Severe Acetabular Defects in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A Long-Term Follow-Up
    Russell, Shane P.
    O'Neill, Cathleen J.
    Fahey, Eoin J.
    Guerin, Shane
    Gul, Rehan
    Harty, James A.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2021, 36 (05) : 1740 - 1745
  • [32] Treatment of femoral bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty: a clinical practice review
    Ali, Erden
    Howard, Lisa C.
    Neufeld, Michael E.
    Masri, Bassam A.
    ANNALS OF JOINT, 2024, 9 : 1 - 12
  • [33] Revision of Failed Total Hip Arthroplasty Acetabular Cups to Porous Tantalum Components A 5-Year Follow-Up Study
    Fernandez-Fairen, Mariano
    Murcia, Antonio
    Blanco, Agustin
    Merono, Antonio
    Murcia, Antonio, Jr.
    Ballester, Jorge
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2010, 25 (06) : 865 - 872
  • [34] Two-Stage Revision Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Hip Infection: Mean Follow-Up of Ten Years
    Chen, Szu-Yuan
    Hu, Chi-Chien
    Chen, Chun-Chieh
    Chang, Yu-Han
    Hsieh, Pang-Hsin
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 2015
  • [35] Patient-reported and radiographic outcomes of a porous-coated acetabular cup in robotic assisted total hip arthroplasty at 2-year follow up
    Marchand, Robert C.
    Marchand, Kevin
    Taylor, Kelly
    Guerrieo, Zachary
    Hameed, Daniel
    Bains, Sandeep S.
    Dubin, Jeremy A.
    Sodhi, Nipun
    Mont, Michael A.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2023, 46 : 78 - 82
  • [36] Use of Customized 3D-Printed Titanium Augment With Tantalum Trabecular Cup for Large Acetabular Bone Defects in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Midterm Follow-Up Study
    Kong, Keyu
    Zhao, Chen
    Chang, Yongyun
    Qiao, Hua
    Hu, Yi
    Li, Huiwu
    Zhang, Jingwei
    FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2022, 10
  • [37] Grafting with hydroxyapatite granules for defects of acetabular bone at revision total hip replacement A MINIMUM TEN-YEAR FOLLOW-UP
    Sakai, T.
    Ohzono, K.
    Nishii, T.
    Miki, H.
    Takao, M.
    Sugano, N.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2010, 92B (09): : 1215 - 1221
  • [38] Clinical and radiographic results of total hip arthroplasty after a minimum follow-up period of 5 years after insertion of a TriLock bone preservation stem
    Tsubosaka, Masanori
    Hayashi, Shinya
    Hashimoto, Shingo
    Takayama, Koji
    Kuroda, Ryosuke
    Matsumoto, Tomoyuki
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA, 2021, 87 (ES1): : 14 - 19
  • [39] Long-term outcomes of acetabular impaction grafting with cemented cups and trabecular metal for revision hip arthroplasty: a follow-up study
    Curtin, Mark
    Russell, Shane P.
    Mirdad, Rayyan S.
    Irwin, Shane C.
    Rowan, Fiachra E.
    Masterson, Eric L.
    Condon, Finbarr
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 34 (06) : 764 - 771
  • [40] 4-year clinical outcomes of anterior acetabular wall reconstruction and cup revision for treatment of anterior acetabular wall defects with iliopsoas tendinopathy following total hip arthroplasty
    Nogier, Alexis
    Tourabaly, Idriss
    Ramos-Pascual, Sonia
    Debiesse, Jean-Louis
    Chen, Antonia F.
    Saffarini, Mo
    Courtin, Cyril
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2024,