Importance of age at 2nd implantation and interimplant interval to the outcome of bilateral prelingually deafened pediatric cochlear implantation

被引:2
|
作者
Chen, Shih-Lung [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Bang-Yan [3 ]
Lee, Yi-Chieh [3 ]
Lin, Chia-Chen [3 ]
Sun, Yu-Sheng [1 ]
Chan, Kai-Chieh [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Che-Ming [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Linkou Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol & Head & Neck Surg, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Sch Med, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Med Fdn, New Taipei Municipal Tucheng Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol & Head & Neck Surg, 6,Sect 2,Jincheng Rd, New Taipei City 236, Taiwan
关键词
Age at second cochlear implantation; Binaural; Cochlear implant; Inter-implant interval; Quality of hearing; Spatial hearing; Speech perception; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CHILDREN; SPEECH; PERFORMANCE; HEARING; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001068
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background:In Taiwan, the number of cases of sequential bilateral pediatric cochlear implantation (CI) is increasing but data regarding its effectiveness and impact of the reimbursement policy are lacking. We examined the speech perception and quality of life (QOL) of bilateral prelingually deaf children who underwent sequential CI, considering the effects of age at the time of second implantation and interimplant interval. Methods:We enrolled 124 Mandarin-speaking participants who underwent initial cochlear implant (CI1) in 2001-2019 and a second CI (CI2) in 2015-2020. Patients were followed up for >= 2 years and were categorized into groups based on age at the time of CI2 implantation (<3.5, 3.6-7, 7.1-10, 10.1-13, and 13.1-18 years) and interimplant interval (0.5-3, 3.1-5, 5.1-7, 7.1-10, and >10 years). We evaluated speech perception, device usage rates, and QOL using subjective questionnaires (Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing and Comprehension Cochlear Implant Questionnaire). Results:Speech perception scores of CI2 were negatively correlated with ages at the time of CI1 and CI2 implantation and interimplant interval. Older age and a longer interimplant interval were associated with higher nonuse rates for CI2 and worse auditory performance and QOL. Among individuals aged >13 years with interimplant intervals >10 years, up to 44% did not use their second ear. Patients aged 7.1 to 10 years had better speech perception and higher questionnaire scores than those aged 10.1 to 13 and 13.1 to 18 years. Furthermore, patients aged 10.1 to 13 years had a lower rate of continuous CI2 usage compared to those aged 7.1 to 10 years. Conclusion:Timely implantation of CI2 is essential to achieve optimal outcomes, particularly among sequentially implanted patients with long-term deafness in the second ear and no improvement with hearing aids following CI1 implantation. For CI2 implantation, an upper limit of age of 10 years and interimplant interval of 7 years are essential to prevent suboptimal outcomes. These data can provide useful information to implant recipients, their families, and medical and audiological professionals, enabling a comprehensive understanding of the benefits and potential impacts of the timing of CI2 implantation.
引用
收藏
页码:434 / 441
页数:8
相关论文
共 8 条
  • [1] Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults
    Santarelli, Rosamaria
    De Filippi, Roberta
    Genovese, Elisabetta
    Arslan, Edoardo
    AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2008, 13 (04) : 257 - 265
  • [2] Speech Comprehension in Children and Adolescents After Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implantation With Long Interimplant Interval
    Illg, Angelika
    Giourgas, Alexandros
    Kral, Andrej
    Buechner, Andreas
    Lesinski-Schiedat, Anke
    Lenarz, Thomas
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2013, 34 (04) : 682 - 689
  • [3] Outcome of Cochlear Implantation in Prelingually Deafened Children According to Molecular Genetic Etiology
    Park, Joo Hyun
    Kim, Ah Reum
    Han, Jin Hee
    Kim, Seong Dong
    Kim, Shin Hye
    Koo, Ja-Won
    Oh, Seung Ha
    Choi, Byung Yoon
    EAR AND HEARING, 2017, 38 (05) : E316 - E324
  • [4] Sequential pediatric bilateral cochlear implantation: The effect of time interval between implants
    Bianchin, Giovanni
    Tribi, Lorenzo
    Formigoni, Patrizia
    Russo, Carmela
    Polizzi, Valeria
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2017, 102 : 10 - 14
  • [5] Audio-visual speech perception in prelingually deafened Japanese children following sequential bilateral cochlear implantation
    Yamamoto, Ryosuke
    Naito, Yasushi
    Tona, Risa
    Moroto, Saburo
    Tamaya, Rinko
    Fujiwara, Keizo
    Shinohara, Shogo
    Takebayashi, Shinji
    Kikuchi, Masahiro
    Michida, Tetsuhiko
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2017, 102 : 160 - 168
  • [6] Age and Incidence of Cochlear Implantation in the Pediatric Population With Congenital Bilateral Profound Hearing Loss
    Nassiri, Ashley M. M.
    Marinelli, John P. P.
    Lohse, Christine M. M.
    Carlson, Matthew L. L.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2023, 44 (07) : E492 - E496
  • [7] Age at implantation and communicative outcome in pediatric cochlear implant users: Is younger always better?
    Holt, RF
    Svirsky, MA
    Neuburger, H
    Miyamoto, RT
    COCHLEAR IMPLANTS, 2004, 1273 : 368 - 371
  • [8] Comparative study between unilateral and bilateral cochlear implantation in children of 1 and 2 years of age
    Escorihuela Garcia, Vicente
    Pitarch Ribas, Maria Ignacia
    Llopez Carratala, Ignacio
    Latorre Monteagudo, Emilia
    Morant Ventura, Antonio
    Marco Algarra, Jaime
    ACTA OTORRINOLARINGOLOGICA ESPANOLA, 2016, 67 (03): : 148 - 155