Identifying challenges and best practices for implementing AI additional qualifications in vocational and continuing education: a mixed methods analysis

被引:0
作者
Petridou, Efthymia [1 ,2 ]
Lao, Lena [1 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Dept Educ & Rehabil, Munich, Germany
[2] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Inst Educ, Chair Gen Educ & Educ Res, Leopoldstr 13, D-80802 Munich, Germany
关键词
Artificial intelligence; mixed-methods; continuing vocational education; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE;
D O I
10.1080/02601370.2024.2351076
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
As artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly integrates into various industries and educational sectors, there is a growing need for an AI-ready workforce. This study, focusing on a novel AI additional qualification in Germany, investigates the underexplored challenges and best practices regarding the learning software, the learning contents, and the didactic design. Addressing the research question 'What are the teaching and learning experiences in AI additional qualifications, and to what extent do these experiences align?', we adopted a mixed methods analysis. This entailed interviews with four educators and self-reported questionnaires with 73 learners, triangulating both groups' findings for comprehensive insights. Key outcomes from this study demonstrate a significant alignment in teaching and learning experiences, particularly in terms of shared challenges. The findings significantly contribute to AI curriculum development and continuing vocational education and training practice. They underscore the necessity for robust and visually engaging learning software, as well as learning content that primarily covers AI basics with practice-oriented examples. Another best practice emerges for blended learning formats, favouring a greater emphasis on face-to-face instruction complemented by teacher-supported self-directed learning. Future research should focus on balancing theoretical and practical knowledge in AI curricula, preparing teachers for AI content delivery, and optimising teacher-learner interactions.
引用
收藏
页码:385 / 400
页数:16
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [11] Grivokostopoulou F., 2013, INT ASS DEV INFORM S
  • [12] Gutschow K., 2022, BERUFSBILDUNG WISSEN, V51, P27
  • [13] Evaluation of Blended Learning
    Hubackova, Sarka
    Semradova, Ilona
    [J]. FUTURE ACADEMY MULTIDISCIPLINARY CONFERENCE ICEEPSY & CPSYC & ICPSIRS & BE-CI, 2016, 217 : 551 - 557
  • [14] Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research
    Johnson, R. Burke
    Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J.
    Turner, Lisa A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MIXED METHODS RESEARCH, 2007, 1 (02) : 112 - 133
  • [15] Blended learning effectiveness: the relationship between student characteristics, design features and outcomes
    Kintu, Mugenyi Justice
    Zhu, Chang
    Kagambe, Edmond
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2017, 14
  • [16] Mobile Blended Learning and Evaluation of Its Effectiveness on Students' Learning Achievement
    Klimova, Blanka
    Prazak, Pavel
    [J]. BLENDED LEARNING: EDUCATIONAL INNOVATION FOR PERSONALIZED LEARNING, ICBL 2019, 2019, 11546 : 216 - 224
  • [17] Kunze L., 2021, INNOVATIVE LEHRE HOC, P69
  • [18] Leyva O., 2014, Sage Open, P421, DOI DOI 10.1177/2158244014522633
  • [19] Lindner A., 2019, 12 INT C INF SCH SIT
  • [20] McCarthy J, 2006, AI MAG, V27, P12