Identifying challenges and best practices for implementing AI additional qualifications in vocational and continuing education: a mixed methods analysis

被引:0
作者
Petridou, Efthymia [1 ,2 ]
Lao, Lena [1 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Dept Educ & Rehabil, Munich, Germany
[2] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Inst Educ, Chair Gen Educ & Educ Res, Leopoldstr 13, D-80802 Munich, Germany
关键词
Artificial intelligence; mixed-methods; continuing vocational education; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE;
D O I
10.1080/02601370.2024.2351076
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
As artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly integrates into various industries and educational sectors, there is a growing need for an AI-ready workforce. This study, focusing on a novel AI additional qualification in Germany, investigates the underexplored challenges and best practices regarding the learning software, the learning contents, and the didactic design. Addressing the research question 'What are the teaching and learning experiences in AI additional qualifications, and to what extent do these experiences align?', we adopted a mixed methods analysis. This entailed interviews with four educators and self-reported questionnaires with 73 learners, triangulating both groups' findings for comprehensive insights. Key outcomes from this study demonstrate a significant alignment in teaching and learning experiences, particularly in terms of shared challenges. The findings significantly contribute to AI curriculum development and continuing vocational education and training practice. They underscore the necessity for robust and visually engaging learning software, as well as learning content that primarily covers AI basics with practice-oriented examples. Another best practice emerges for blended learning formats, favouring a greater emphasis on face-to-face instruction complemented by teacher-supported self-directed learning. Future research should focus on balancing theoretical and practical knowledge in AI curricula, preparing teachers for AI content delivery, and optimising teacher-learner interactions.
引用
收藏
页码:385 / 400
页数:16
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2015, CED, DOI 10.2801/034661
  • [2] Attwell G., 2020, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGE
  • [3] Cedefop/OECD, 2021, CEDEFOP REFERENCE SE, DOI [10.2801/085907, DOI 10.2801/085907]
  • [4] Knowledge of and Competence in Artificial Intelligence: Perspectives of Vietnamese Digital-Native Students
    Chao, Pei-Ju
    Hsu, Tsu-Hsuan
    Liu, Tsai-Pei
    Cheng, Yu-Huei
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 75751 - 75760
  • [5] Chen X., 2020, Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, V1, P100002, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.CAEAI.2020.100002, 10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100002]
  • [6] Chih-Hsiung Tu, 2002, American Journal of Distance Education, V16, P131, DOI 10.1207/S15389286AJDE1603_2
  • [7] Sustainable Curriculum Planning for Artificial Intelligence Education: A Self-determination Theory Perspective
    Chiu, Thomas K. F.
    Chai, Ching-sing
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (14)
  • [8] Creswell J. W., 2009, Research design. Qualitative, quantitative
  • [9] The role and challenges of education for responsible AI
    Dignum, Virginia
    [J]. LONDON REVIEW OF EDUCATION, 2021, 19 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [10] Ditton H., 2013, INTERESSANTHEIT RELE, DOI [10.7477/18:30:1, DOI 10.7477/18:30:1]