Contributive roles of multilevel organizational learning for the evolution of organizational ambidexterity

被引:19
作者
Yan, Mengling [1 ]
Yu, Yan [2 ]
Dong, Xiaoying [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Guanghua Sch Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Renmin Univ China, Key Lab Data Engn & Knowledge Engn MOE, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Organizational learning; Case study; Capacity building; Evolutionary theory; MEDIATING ROLE; EXPLORATION; EXPLOITATION; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; INNOVATION; ANTECEDENTS; KNOWLEDGE; MODEL; FLEXIBILITY;
D O I
10.1108/ITP-04-2015-0079
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to reveal how organizational learning at the strategic and operational levels (i.e. strategic learning and business learning, respectively) contribute to the development of organizational ambidexterity along the growth of enterprises from an evolutionary view. Design/methodology/approach - The authors conducted a longitudinal single case study on Huawei - a leading Chinese firm in the telecommunication industry. Data were collected from various sources including interviews, senior speeches, scholarly publications, company magazines and other documents, and was analyzed in line with the principles of grounded theory. Findings - This research reveals that the case company (Huawei) constructed organizational ambidexterity with different foci during different development stages. The organization's ambidextrous capability evolves over time, shifting from one domain to another. Such ambidexterity development was largely beneficial from the multilevel organizational learning at both the strategic level (focussing on the whole organization and long-term goals) and operational level (focussing on local interests and short-term goals). Originality/value - This paper represents one of the earliest works to uncover the ambidexterity building process from an evolutionary approach that requires the collection of longitudinal data. Also, the paper proposes a multi-level learning framework for ambidexterity building in practice. This framework distinguishes strategic learning from business learning and projects the two types of learning into learning at four levels-individual, team, intra-organizational, and inter-organizational, which can be leveraged to guide division of labor among hierarchical levels during the progressive development of ambidexterity.
引用
收藏
页码:647 / 667
页数:21
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system [J].
Adler, PS ;
Goldoftas, B ;
Levine, DI .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1999, 10 (01) :43-68
[2]   SINGLE-LOOP AND DOUBLE-LOOP MODELS IN RESEARCH ON DECISION-MAKING [J].
ARGYRIS, C .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1976, 21 (03) :363-375
[3]   Balancing exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of competitive intensity [J].
Auh, S ;
Menguc, B .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2005, 58 (12) :1652-1661
[4]  
Beckman CM, 2006, ACAD MANAGE J, V49, P741, DOI 10.2307/20159796
[5]   Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited [J].
Benner, MJ ;
Tushman, ML .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2003, 28 (02) :238-256
[6]   Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects [J].
Cao, Qing ;
Gedajlovic, Eric ;
Zhang, Hongping .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (04) :781-796
[7]   How top management team behavioral integration and behavioral complexity enable organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of contextual ambidexterity [J].
Carmeli, Abraham ;
Halevi, Meyrav Yitzack .
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2009, 20 (02) :207-218
[8]   An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution [J].
Crossan, MM ;
Lane, HW ;
White, RE .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1999, 24 (03) :522-537
[9]   Organizational learning and strategic renewal [J].
Crossan, MM ;
Berdrow, I .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2003, 24 (11) :1087-1105
[10]   TOWARD A MODEL OF ORGANIZATIONS AS INTERPRETATION SYSTEMS [J].
DAFT, RL ;
WEICK, KE .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1984, 9 (02) :284-295