A comparative study of machine learning regression models for production systems condition monitoring

被引:1
|
作者
Jankovic, D. [1 ]
Simic, M. [1 ]
Herakovic, N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Mech Engn, Dept Mfg Technol & Syst, Ljubljana, Slovenia
来源
关键词
Hydraulic press; Metal forming; Machine Learning (ML); Linear Regression (LR); Decision Trees (DT); Support Vector Machine (SVM); Gaussian Process Regression (GPR); Artificial Neural Networks (ANN);
D O I
10.14743/apem2024.1.494
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This research investigates the benefits of different Machine Learning (ML) approaches in production systems, with respect to the given use case of considering the forming process and different friction conditions on hydraulic press response in between the phases of the sheet metal bending cycle, i.e. bending, levelling and movement. A framework for enhancing production systems with ML facilitates the transition to smarter processes and enables fast, accurate predictions integrated into decision-making and adaptive control. Comparative ML analysis provides insights into predictive regression models for hydraulic press condition recognition, enhancing process improvement. Our results are supported by performance evaluation metrics of predictive accuracy RMSE, MAE, MSE and R 2 for Linear Regression (LR), Decision Trees (DT), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) and Neural Network (NN) models. Given the remarkable predictive accuracy of the regression models with R 2 values between 0.9483 and 0.9995, it is noteworthy that less complex models exhibit significantly shorter training times, up to 437 times shorter than more complex models. In addition, simpler models have up to 36 times better prediction rates, compared to more complex models. The fundamentals illustrate the trade-offs between model complexity, accuracy and computational training and prediction rate.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 92
页数:152
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A review of the applications of machine learning in the condition monitoring of transformers
    Amir Esmaeili Nezhad
    Mohammad Hamed Samimi
    Energy Systems, 2024, 15 : 463 - 493
  • [42] Machine Learning Applications in Power System Condition Monitoring
    Stephen, Bruce
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (05)
  • [43] Machine Learning for Condition Monitoring: Latest Trend and Review
    Hanganu, Bogdan
    Radu, Lucian A.
    Baicoianu, Alexandra
    EDUCATION EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION MANAGEMENT: A 2025 VISION TO SUSTAIN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DURING GLOBAL CHALLENGES, 2020, : 13048 - 13059
  • [44] A machine learning approach for the condition monitoring of rotating machinery
    Kateris, Dimitrios
    Moshou, Dimitrios
    Pantazi, Xanthoula-Eirini
    Gravalos, Ioannis
    Sawalhi, Nader
    Loutridis, Spiros
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 28 (01) : 61 - 71
  • [45] Application of Machine Learning for Tool Condition Monitoring in Turning
    Patange, A. D.
    Jegadeeshwaran, R.
    Bajaj, N. S.
    Khairnar, A. N.
    Gavade, N. A.
    SOUND AND VIBRATION, 2022, 56 (02): : 127 - 145
  • [46] Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Predictive Maintenance of Ball Bearing Systems
    Farooq, Umer
    Ademola, Moses
    Shaalan, Abdu
    ELECTRONICS, 2024, 13 (02)
  • [47] Classification and regression models of audio and vibration signals for machine state monitoring in precision machining systems
    Han, Seulki
    Mannan, Nasir
    Stein, Daryl C.
    Pattipati, Krishna R.
    Bollas, George M.
    JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 2021, 61 : 45 - 53
  • [48] Condition and performance monitoring of subsea production systems
    Donnelly, John
    JPT, Journal of Petroleum Technology, 2013, 65 (12): : 36 - 39
  • [49] A Comparative Study of Forecasting Electricity Consumption Using Machine Learning Models
    Li Lee, Madeline Hui
    Ser, Yee Chee
    Selvachandran, Ganeshsree
    Pham Huy Thong
    Le Cuong
    Le Hoang Son
    Nguyen Trung Tuan
    Gerogiannis, Vassilis C.
    MATHEMATICS, 2022, 10 (08)
  • [50] A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Models for Daily and Weekly Rainfall Forecasting
    Kumar, Vijendra
    Kedam, Naresh
    Kisi, Ozgur
    Alsulamy, Saleh
    Khedher, Khaled Mohamed
    Salem, Mohamed Abdelaziz
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2025, 39 (01) : 271 - 290