Treatment plan complexity quantification for predicting gamma passing rates in patient-specific quality assurance for stereotactic volumetric modulated arc therapy

被引:1
作者
Xue, Xudong [1 ]
Luan, Shunyao [1 ,2 ]
Ding, Yi [1 ]
Li, Xiangbin [1 ]
Li, Dan [1 ]
Wang, Jingya [1 ]
Ma, Chi [3 ]
Jiang, Man [4 ]
Wei, Wei [1 ]
Wang, Xiao [3 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Hubei Canc Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Dept Radiat Oncol, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Optoelect Engn, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[3] Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Rutgers Canc Inst New Jersey, Dept Radiat Oncol, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[4] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Energy & Power Engn, Dept Nucl Engn & Technol, Wuhan, Peoples R China
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2024年 / 25卷 / 09期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
complexity metric; machine learning; quality assurance; stereotactic VMAT; APERTURE COMPLEXITY; IMRT; METRICS; INDEXES;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.14432
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose To investigate the beam complexity of stereotactic Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) plans quantitively and predict gamma passing rates (GPRs) using machine learning. Methods The entire dataset is exclusively made of stereotactic VMAT plans (301 plans with 594 beams) from Varian Edge LINAC. The GPRs were analyzed using Varian's portal dosimetry with 2%/2 mm criteria. A total of 27 metrics were calculated to investigate the correlation between metrics and GPRs. Random forest and gradient boosting models were developed and trained to predict the GPRs based on the extracted complexity features. The threshold values of complexity metric were obtained to predict a given beam to pass or fail from ROC curve analysis. Results The three moderately significant values of Spearman's rank correlation to GPRs were 0.508 (p < 0.001), 0.445 (p < 0.001), and -0.416 (p < 0.001) for proposed metric LAAM, the ratio of the average aperture area over jaw area (AAJA) and index of modulation, respectively. The random forest method achieved 98.74% prediction accuracy with mean absolute error of 1.23% using five-fold cross-validation, and 98.71% with 1.25% for gradient boosting regressor method, respectively. LAAM, leaf travelling distance (LT), AAJA, LT modulation complexity score (LTMCS) and index of modulation, were the top five most important complexity features. The LAAM metric showed the best performance with AUC value of 0.801, and threshold value of 0.365. Conclusions The calculated metrics were effective in quantifying the complexity of stereotactic VMAT plans. We have demonstrated that the GPRs could be accurately predicted using machine learning methods based on extracted complexity metrics. The quantification of complexity and machine learning methods have the potential to improve stereotactic treatment planning and identify the failure of QA results promptly.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Use of metrics to quantify IMRT and VMAT treatment plan complexity: A systematic review and perspectives
    Antoine, Mikael
    Ralite, Flavien
    Soustiel, Charles
    Marsac, Thomas
    Sargos, Paul
    Cugny, Audrey
    Caron, Jerome
    [J]. PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 64 : 98 - 108
  • [2] Stereotactic body radiation therapy: The report of AAPM Task Group 101
    Benedict, Stanley H.
    Yenice, Kamil M.
    Followill, David
    Galvin, James M.
    Hinson, William
    Kavanagh, Brian
    Keall, Paul
    Lovelock, Michael
    Meeks, Sanford
    Papiez, Lech
    Purdie, Thomas
    Sadagopan, Ramaswamy
    Schell, Michael C.
    Salter, Bill
    Schlesinger, David J.
    Shiu, Almon S.
    Solberg, Timothy
    Song, Danny Y.
    Stieber, Volker
    Timmerman, Robert
    Tome, Wolfgang A.
    Verellen, Dirk
    Wang, Lu
    Yin, Fang-Fang
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (08) : 4078 - 4101
  • [3] Random forests
    Breiman, L
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) : 5 - 32
  • [4] Initial characterization, dosimetric benchmark and performance validation of Dynamic Wave Arc
    Burghelea, Manuela
    Verellen, Dirk
    Poels, Kenneth
    Hung, Cecilia
    Nakamura, Mitsuhiro
    Dhont, Jennifer
    Gevaert, Thierry
    Van den Begin, Robbe
    Collen, Christine
    Matsuo, Yukinori
    Kishi, Takahiro
    Simon, Viorica
    Hiraoka, Masahiro
    de Ridder, Mark
    [J]. RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2016, 11
  • [5] Complexity metrics for IMRT and VMAT plans: a review of current literature and applications
    Chiavassa, Sophie
    Bessieres, Igor
    Edouard, Magali
    Mathot, Michel
    Moignier, Alexandra
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 92 (1102)
  • [6] Impact of plan parameters and modulation indices on patient-specific QA results for standard and stereotactic VMAT
    Chun, Minsoo
    An, Hyun Joon
    Kwon, Ohyun
    Oh, Do Hoon
    Park, Jong Min
    Kim, Jung-in
    [J]. PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 62 : 83 - 94
  • [7] Examination of the properties of IMRT and VMAT beams and evaluation against pre-treatment quality assurance results
    Crowe, S. B.
    Kairn, T.
    Middlebrook, N.
    Sutherland, B.
    Hill, B.
    Kenny, J.
    Langton, C. M.
    Trapp, J. V.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 60 (06) : 2587 - 2601
  • [8] Quantification of beam complexity in intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment plans
    Du, Weiliang
    Cho, Sang Hyun
    Zhang, Xiaodong
    Hoffman, Karen E.
    Kudchadker, Rajat J.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (02)
  • [9] What is an acceptably smoothed fluence? Dosimetric and delivery considerations for dynamic sliding window IMRT
    Giorgia, Nicolini
    Antonella, Fogliata
    Eugenio, Vanetti
    Alessandro, Clivio
    Filippo, Ammazzalorso
    Luca, Cozzi
    [J]. RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2007, 2
  • [10] Development and evaluation of aperture-based complexity metrics using film and EPID measurements of static MLC openings
    Gotstedt, Julia
    Hauer, Anna Karlsson
    Back, Anna
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (07) : 3911 - 3921