Enhancing LC x LC separations through multi-task Bayesian optimization

被引:2
作者
Boelrijk, Jim [1 ,2 ]
Molenaar, Stef R. A. [3 ,4 ]
Bos, Tijmen S. [3 ,4 ]
Dahlseid, Tina A. [5 ]
Ensing, Bernd [1 ,6 ]
Stoll, Dwight R. [3 ]
Forre, Patrick [1 ,2 ]
Pirok, Bob W. J. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Informat Inst, AI4Sci Lab, Sci Pk 904, NL-1098 XH Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Informat Inst, AMLab, Sci Pk 904, NL-1098 XH Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Amsterdam Inst Mol & Life Sci, Div Bioanalyt Chem, Boelelaan 1085, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Vant Hoff Inst Mol Sci, Analyt Chem Grp, Sci Pk 904, NL-1098 XH Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Gustavus Adolphus Coll, Dept Chem, St Peter, MN 56082 USA
[6] Univ Amsterdam, Vant Hoff Inst Mol Sci, Comp Chem Grp, Sci Pk 904, NL-1098 XH Amsterdam, Netherlands
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 荷兰研究理事会;
关键词
Bayesian optimization; 2D-LC; Closed-loop method development; Machine learning; Shifting gradients; 2-DIMENSIONAL LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS-SPECTROMETRY; PHASE; PERFORMANCE; RETENTION; INSTRUMENTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.chroma.2024.464941
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Method development in comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography (LC x LC) is a challenging process. The interdependencies between the two dimensions and the possibility of incorporating complex gradient profiles, such as multi -segmented gradients or shifting gradients, make trial -and -error method development time-consuming and highly dependent on user experience. Retention modeling and Bayesian optimization (BO) have been proposed as solutions to mitigate these issues. However, both approaches have their strengths and weaknesses. On the one hand, retention modeling, which approximates true retention behavior, depends on effective peak tracking and accurate retention time and width predictions, which are increasingly challenging for complex samples and advanced gradient assemblies. On the other hand, Bayesian optimization may require many experiments when dealing with many adjustable parameters, as in LC x LC. Therefore, in this work, we investigate the use of multi -task Bayesian optimization (MTBO), a method that can combine information from both retention modeling and experimental measurements. The algorithm was first tested and compared with BO using a synthetic retention modeling test case, where it was shown that MTBO finds better optima with fewer method -development iterations than conventional BO. Next, the algorithm was tested on the optimization of a method for a pesticide sample and we found that the algorithm was able to improve upon the initial scanning experiments. Multi -task Bayesian optimization is a promising technique in situations where modeling retention is challenging, and the high number of adjustable parameters and/or limited optimization budget makes traditional Bayesian optimization impractical.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Balandat M., 2020, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, V33
[2]  
Beens J, 2000, HRC-J HIGH RES CHROM, V23, P182
[3]   SIMPLEX OPTIMIZATION OF HIGH-PERFORMANCE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHIC SEPARATIONS [J].
BERRIDGE, JC .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY, 1989, 485 :3-14
[4]   UNATTENDED OPTIMIZATION OF REVERSED-PHASE HIGH-PERFORMANCE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHIC SEPARATIONS USING THE MODIFIED SIMPLEX ALGORITHM [J].
BERRIDGE, JC .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY, 1982, 244 (01) :1-14
[5]   Closed-loop automatic gradient design for liquid chromatography using Bayesian optimization [J].
Boelrijk, Jim ;
Ensing, Bernd ;
Forre, Patrick ;
Pirok, Bob W. J. .
ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2023, 1242
[6]   Bayesian optimization of comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography separations [J].
Boelrijk, Jim ;
Pirok, Bob ;
Ensing, Bernd ;
Forre, Patrick .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2021, 1659
[7]   Chemometric Strategies for Fully Automated Interpretive Method Development in Liquid Chromatography [J].
Bos, Tijmen S. ;
Boelrijk, Jim ;
Molenaar, Stef R. A. ;
Veer, Brian van 't ;
Niezen, Leon E. ;
van Herwerden, Denice ;
Samanipour, Saer ;
Stoll, Dwight R. ;
Forre, Patrick ;
Ensing, Bernd ;
Somsen, Govert W. ;
Pirok, Bob W. J. .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2022, 94 (46) :16060-16068
[8]   Reducing the influence of geometry-induced gradient deformation in liquid chromatographic retention modelling [J].
Bos, Tijmen S. ;
Niezen, Leon E. ;
den Uijl, Mimi J. ;
Molenaar, Stef R. A. ;
Lege, Sascha ;
Schoenmakers, Peter J. ;
Somsen, Govert W. ;
Pirok, Bob W. J. .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2021, 1635
[9]   MUSCLE: automated multi-objective evolutionary optimization of targeted LC-MS/MS analysis [J].
Bradbury, James ;
Genta-Jouve, Gregory ;
Allwood, J. William ;
Dunn, Warwick B. ;
Goodacre, Royston ;
Knowles, Joshua D. ;
He, Shan ;
Viant, Mark R. .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2015, 31 (06) :975-977
[10]   AUTOMATED INSTRUMENTATION FOR COMPREHENSIVE 2-DIMENSIONAL HIGH-PERFORMANCE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY OF PROTEINS [J].
BUSHEY, MM ;
JORGENSON, JW .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1990, 62 (02) :161-167