Understanding the barriers to integrating maternal and mental health at primary health care in Vietnam

被引:2
作者
Trang, Do Thi Hanh [1 ]
Ha, Bui Thi Thu [1 ]
Vui, Le Thi [1 ]
Chi, Nguyen Thai Quynh [1 ]
Thi, Le Minh [1 ]
Duong, Doan Thi Thuy [1 ]
Hung, Dang The [1 ]
de Chavez, Anna Cronin [2 ]
Manzano, Ana [3 ]
Lakin, Kimberly [4 ]
Kane, Sumit [4 ]
Mirzoev, Tolib [2 ]
机构
[1] Hanoi Univ Publ Hlth, 1A Duc Thang, Hanoi 10000, Vietnam
[2] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Global Hlth & Dev, Keppel St, London WC1E 7HT, England
[3] Univ Leeds, Sch Sociol & Social Policy, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[4] Univ Melbourne, Nossal Inst Global Hlth, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
基金
英国惠康基金; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Integration; maternal mental health; health system responsiveness; common perinatal mental disorders; RESPONSIVENESS CONCEPT; DISORDERS; WOMEN; PREVALENCE; SYSTEM; MIDWIFERY; HOSPITALS; ILLNESS;
D O I
10.1093/heapol/czae027
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The prevalence of common perinatal mental disorders in Vietnam ranges from 16.9% to 39.9%, and substantial treatment gaps have been identified at all levels. This paper explores constraints to the integration of maternal and mental health services at the primary healthcare level and the implications for the health system's responsiveness to the needs and expectations of pregnant women with mental health conditions in Vietnam. As part of the RESPONSE project, a three-phase realist evaluation study, we present Phase 1 findings, which employed systematic and scoping literature reviews and qualitative data collection (focus groups and interviews) with key health system actors in Bac Giang province, Vietnam, to understand the barriers to maternal mental healthcare provision, utilization and integration strategies. A four-level framing of the barriers to integrating perinatal mental health services in Vietnam was used in reporting findings, which comprised individual, sociocultural, organizational and structural levels. At the sociocultural and structural levels, these barriers included cultural beliefs about the holistic notion of physical and mental health, stigma towards mental health, biomedical approach to healthcare services, absence of comprehensive mental health policy and a lack of mental health workforce. At the organizational level, there was an absence of clinical guidelines on the integration of mental health in routine antenatal visits, a shortage of staff and poor health facilities. Finally, at the provider level, a lack of knowledge and training on mental health was identified. The integration of mental health into routine antenatal visits at the primary care level has the potential help to reduce stigma towards mental health and improve health system responsiveness by providing services closer to the local level, offering prompt attention, better choice of services and better communication while ensuring privacy and confidentiality of services. This can improve the demand for mental health services and help reduce the delay of care-seeking.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 551
页数:11
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [1] Health system responsiveness in maternity care at Hadiya zone public hospitals in Southern Ethiopia: Users' perspectives
    Abdo, Ritbano Ahmed
    Halil, Hassen Mosa
    Kebede, Biruk Assefa
    Anshebo, Abebe Alemu
    Ayalew, Minychil Demelash
    Nedamo, Selamu Abose
    Helill, Shamill Eanga
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (10):
  • [2] Perceptions and experiences of perinatal mental disorders in rural, predominantly ethnic minority communities in northern Vietnam
    Abrams, Daniel
    Nguyen, Liem T.
    Murphy, Jill
    Lee, Younji
    Tran, Nhu K.
    Wiljer, David
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH SYSTEMS, 2016, 10
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2000, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V78, P868
  • [4] Maternal mental health: The missing "m" in the global maternal and child health agenda
    Atif, Najia
    Lovell, Karina
    Rahman, Atif
    [J]. SEMINARS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2015, 39 (05) : 345 - 352
  • [5] Factors influencing the underutilization of mental health services among Asian American women with a history of depression and suicide
    Augsberger, Astraea
    Yeung, Albert
    Dougher, Meaghan
    Hahm, Hyeouk Chris
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2015, 15
  • [6] Barriers to addressing perinatal mental health issues in midwifery settings
    Bayrampour, Hamideh
    Hapsari, Ayu Pinky
    Pavlovic, Jelena
    [J]. MIDWIFERY, 2018, 59 : 47 - 58
  • [7] Integration of HIV and reproductive health services in public sector facilities: analysis of client flow data over time in Kenya
    Birdthistle, Isolde J.
    Fenty, Justin
    Collumbien, Martine
    Warren, Charlotte
    Kimani, James
    Ndwiga, Charity
    Mayhew, Susannah
    Vassall, Anna
    Birdthistle, Isolde
    Church, Kathryn
    Colombini, Manuela
    Friend-DuPreez, Natalie
    Howard, Natasha
    Mak, Joelle
    Mutemwa, Richard
    Obure, Dayo
    Sweeney, Sedona
    Watts, Charlotte
    Abuya, Timothy
    Askew, Ian
    Kikuvi, Joshua
    Kivunaga, Jackline
    Mdawida, Brian
    Oweya, Erick
    Hopkins, Jonathan
    Oteba, Lawrence
    Stackpool-Moore, Lucy
    Trossero, Ale
    Nhlabatsi, Zelda
    Simelane, Dudu
    Muketo, Esther
    Chatuluka, Mathias
    [J]. BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2018, 3 (05):
  • [8] How does mental health care perform in respect to service users' expectations?: Evaluating inpatient and outpatient care in Germany with the WHO responsiveness concept
    Bramesfeld, Anke
    Wedegaertner, Felix
    Elgeti, Hermann
    Bisson, Susanne
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2007, 7 (1)
  • [9] How do patients expect the mental health service system to act? Testing the WHO responsiveness concept for its appropriateness in mental health care
    Bramesfeld, Anke
    Klippel, Ulrike
    Seidel, Gabriele
    Schwartz, Friedrich W.
    Dierks, Marie-Luise
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2007, 65 (05) : 880 - 889
  • [10] One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?
    Braun, Virginia
    Clarke, Victoria
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 18 (03) : 328 - 352