Comparison of the effectiveness of levonorgestrel intrauterine system and dienogest in the management of adenomyosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Akhigbe, R. E. [1 ,2 ]
Afolabi, O. A. [2 ,3 ]
Adegbola, C. A. [1 ,2 ]
Akhigbe, T. M. [2 ,4 ]
Oyedokun, P. A. [1 ,2 ]
Afolabi, O. A. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Ladoke Akintola Univ Technol, Dept Physiol, Ogbomosho, Oyo, Nigeria
[2] Oasis Grace Hosp, Reprod Biol & Toxicol Res Lab, Osogbo, Osun, Nigeria
[3] Bowen Univ Teaching Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Ogbomosho, Oyo, Nigeria
[4] Osun State Univ, Dept Agron, Breeding & Genet Unit, Ejigbo, Osun, Nigeria
关键词
Adenomyosis; Dienogest; LNG-IUS; Progestin; Uterine lesions; VAS; PAINFUL SYMPTOMS; LYMPHANGIOGENESIS; DIAGNOSIS; EFFICACY; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.07.038
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Adenomyosis is a gynaecological lesion that impairs female fertility and contributes to reduced quality of life. There are several surgical and medical options for the management of this lesion; however, women who wish to conceive opt for medical therapies such as the levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LNG-IUS) and dienogest, which have various outcomes. To date, there is no consensus regarding which is more effective. Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of LNG-IUS and dienogest for the management of adenomyosis, and explore the risk of occurrence of known side effects for both treatments. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis exploring the effectiveness of LNG-IUS and dienogest for the management of adenomyosis. Methods: A literature search was conducted using PICO guidelines and EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science databases. Only clinical trials were collected and analysed. Results: Of the 792 studies that were initially identified, six were eligible for inclusion in this study. The studies included a total of 707 women; of these, 270 were treated with LNG-IUS, 354 were treated with dienogest, and 83 were controls. All the studies were from Asia (Bangladesh n = 1, China n = 2, Indian = 1, Japan n = 1, South Korean = 1). Dienogest was found to reduce pelvic pain significantly, evidenced by a lower visual analogue scale score, compared with LNG-IUS. Also, dienogest led to a significant reduction in uterine volume compared with LNG-IUS. However, subjects in the LNG-IUS group had significantly higher levels of haemoglobin than those in the dienogest group. Nonetheless, the occurrence of side effects such as weight gain, breast tenderness/distension, headache, insomnia/sleep disorder, depression/mood disorder, skin disorder/acne, and coital discomfort/ reduced libido were comparable in both treatment groups. Conclusion: Dienogest may be more effective than LNG-IUS for the management of adenomyosis, as it shows a superior effect in the reduction of pelvic pain and uterine volume. As only six studies were included in the present meta-analysis due to the paucity of data in the literature, it is recommended that well-designed randomized controlled trials comparing the effectiveness of dienogest with LNG-IUS should be conducted.
引用
收藏
页码:230 / 239
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Uterine adenomyosis and in vitro fertilization outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Vercellini, Paolo
    Consonni, Dario
    Dridi, Dhouha
    Bracco, Benedetta
    Frattaruolo, Maria Pina
    Somigliana, Edgardo
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2014, 29 (05) : 964 - 977
  • [22] Efficacy of levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system as a postoperative maintenance therapy of endometriosis: A meta-analysis
    Song, Soo Youn
    Park, Mia
    Lee, Geon Woo
    Lee, Ki Hwan
    Chang, Ha Kyun
    Kwak, Sang Mi
    Yoo, Heon Jong
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2018, 231 : 85 - 92
  • [23] Laparoscopic adenomyomectomy combined with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system is effective for long-term management of adenomyosis
    Jiang, Jilan
    Pan, Yilian
    Yu, Jin
    Zhang, Ye
    Yang, Yeping
    Xu, Hong
    Sun, Feng
    BMC WOMENS HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [24] Effectiveness of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in the treatment of adenomyosis diagnosed and monitored by magnetic resonance imaging
    Bragheto, Aristides M.
    Caserta, Nelson
    Bahamondes, Luis
    Petta, Carlos A.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2007, 76 (03) : 195 - 199
  • [25] Effects of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system plus estrogen therapy in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Somboonporn, Woraluk
    Panna, Sunida
    Temtanakitpaisan, Teerayut
    Kaewrudee, Srinaree
    Soontrapa, Sukree
    MENOPAUSE-THE JOURNAL OF THE NORTH AMERICAN MENOPAUSE SOCIETY, 2011, 18 (10): : 1060 - 1066
  • [26] Short-term Outcomes of Acupuncture Interventions on Uterine Adenomyosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Li, Qi
    Li, Yun-Xia
    Fan, Lu
    Yuan, Su-E
    ACUPUNCTURE & ELECTRO-THERAPEUTICS RESEARCH, 2022, 47 (02) : 203 - 214
  • [27] Efficacy of Dienogest for Prevention of Endometriosis Recurrence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Assiri, Hussain M. A.
    Alomari, Mashail A. S.
    Alshehri, Atheer D. M.
    Alahmari, Asma S. Y.
    Alasmari, Manal M.
    WORLD FAMILY MEDICINE, 2022, 20 (11): : 165 - 171
  • [28] Transvaginal Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Adenomyosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Andres, Marina Paula
    Borrelli, Giuliano Moyses
    Ribeiro, Juliana
    Baracat, Edmund Chada
    Abrao, Mauricio Simoes
    Kho, Rosanne M.
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 25 (02) : 257 - 264
  • [29] A systematic review with meta-analysis: the common sonographic characteristics of adenomyosis
    Dartmouth, Katherine
    ULTRASOUND, 2014, 22 (03) : 148 - 157
  • [30] Comparison of effectiveness of hyaluronan gel, intrauterine device and their combination for prevention adhesions in patients after intrauterine surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Unanyan, Ara
    Pivazyan, Laura
    Krylova, Ekaterina
    Obosyan, Lilia
    Ishchenko, Anatoly
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2022, 51 (04)