Enhancing the impact of literature reviews: guidelines for making meaningful contributions

被引:0
|
作者
van Riel, Allard [1 ]
Snyder, Hannah [2 ]
机构
[1] Hasselt Univ, Diepenbeek, Belgium
[2] BI Norwegian Business Sch, Oslo, Norway
关键词
Literature reviews; SLR; Bibliometric; Academic; Theoretical; Managerial; Meta-analysis; Research contribution; METHODOLOGY; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1108/SJME-05-2024-0125
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - Most papers and books on conducting literature reviews primarily emphasize achieving technical quality, ensuring reproducibility and validating results. Notwithstanding the need for technical excellence, there is also a need for relevance. The purpose of this study is to address that need and offer practical and constructive suggestions for enhancing the meaningful contribution of a literature review, thereby increasing its impact and relevance for publication. Design/methodology/approach - In this conceptual paper, the authors explore strategies to enhance the relevance and contribution of a literature review. By clarifying the needs of diverse audiences and the principles of generating new insights, the authors provide a broad range of options without being prescriptive. Recognizing that every literature review is unique, this paper contrasts various approaches to offer flexible and adaptable guidance. Findings - Literature reviews can be enjoyable to read and write, offering a wide range of substantial contributions that meet the expectations of readers and journal editors. This paper offers practical suggestions for prospective authors to make their reviews more relevant, invaluable and engaging, and summarizes these suggestions in a comprehensive checklist. Research limitations/implications - The paper is not exhaustive but rather complements prevalent literature review methodologies. Originality/value - Existing literature offers limited guidance on enhancing a review's contribution to science, academic inquiry and society. This paper fills that gap by providing both academic considerations and practical recommendations, drawing on the author's extensive experience in reviewing and conducting literature reviews.
引用
收藏
页码:250 / 265
页数:16
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice
    Kraus, Sascha
    Breier, Matthias
    Lim, Weng Marc
    Dabic, Marina
    Kumar, Satish
    Kanbach, Dominik
    Mukherjee, Debmalya
    Corvello, Vincenzo
    Pineiro-Chousa, Juan
    Liguori, Eric
    Palacios-Marques, Daniel
    Schiavone, Francesco
    Ferraris, Alberto
    Fernandes, Cristina
    Ferreira, Joao J.
    REVIEW OF MANAGERIAL SCIENCE, 2022, 16 (08) : 2577 - 2595
  • [2] Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice
    Sascha Kraus
    Matthias Breier
    Weng Marc Lim
    Marina Dabić
    Satish Kumar
    Dominik Kanbach
    Debmalya Mukherjee
    Vincenzo Corvello
    Juan Piñeiro-Chousa
    Eric Liguori
    Daniel Palacios-Marqués
    Francesco Schiavone
    Alberto Ferraris
    Cristina Fernandes
    João J. Ferreira
    Review of Managerial Science, 2022, 16 : 2577 - 2595
  • [3] Screening and enhancing intellectual capital consistency: A scoping review of systematised literature reviews
    Pedro, Eugenia
    Leitao, Joao
    Alves, Helena
    JOURNAL OF INNOVATION & KNOWLEDGE, 2025, 10 (02):
  • [4] Making literature reviews more reliable through application of lessons from systematic reviews
    Haddaway, N. R.
    Woodcock, P.
    Macura, B.
    Collins, A.
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2015, 29 (06) : 1596 - 1605
  • [5] Writing Qualitative IS Literature Reviews - Guidelines for Synthesis, Interpretation, and Guidance of Research
    Schryen, Guido
    COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2015, 37 : 286 - 325
  • [6] Time relevance, citation of reporting guidelines, and breadth of literature search in systematic reviews in orthodontics
    Livas, Christos
    Pandis, Nikolaos
    Ren, Yijin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2015, 37 (02) : 183 - 187
  • [7] Shades of Grey: Guidelines for Working with the Grey Literature in Systematic Reviews for Management and Organizational Studies
    Adams, Richard J.
    Smart, Palie
    Huff, Anne Sigismund
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2017, 19 (04) : 432 - 454
  • [8] Sensitivity analyses assessing the impact of early stopping on systematic reviews: Recommendations for interpreting guidelines
    Schou, I. Manjula
    Marschner, Ian C.
    Askie, Lisa M.
    RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2020, 11 (02) : 287 - 300
  • [9] Healthcare Simulation Training Guidelines and Literature Reviews From the Third Society for Simulation in Healthcare Research Summit
    Scerbo, Mark W.
    SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE, 2024, 19 (1S): : S1 - S3
  • [10] Deduplication methods for literature citations in systematic evidence reviews: practical insights to guide decision-making
    Askin, Nicole
    Okoli, George
    HEALTH SERVICES AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2024, : 214 - 221