DynGFN: Towards Bayesian Inference of Gene Regulatory Networks with GFlowNets

被引:0
作者
Atanackovic, Lazar [1 ,2 ]
Tong, Alexander [3 ,4 ]
Wang, Bo [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Lee, Leo J. [1 ,2 ]
Bengio, Yoshua [3 ,4 ]
Hartford, Jason [3 ,4 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Vector Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Mila Quebec AI Inst, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Univ Montreal, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] Univ Hlth Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Valence Labs, Montreal, PQ, Canada
来源
ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 36 (NEURIPS 2023) | 2023年
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
One of the grand challenges of cell biology is inferring the gene regulatory network (GRN) which describes interactions between genes and their products that control gene expression and cellular function. We can treat this as a causal discovery problem but with two non-standard challenges: (1) regulatory networks are inherently cyclic so we should not model a GRN as a directed acyclic graph (DAG), and (2) observations have significant measurement noise, so for typical sample sizes there will always be a large equivalence class of graphs that are likely given the data, and we want methods that capture this uncertainty. Existing methods either focus on challenge (1), identifying cyclic structure from dynamics, or on challenge (2) learning complex Bayesian posteriors over DAGs, but not both. In this paper we leverage the fact that it is possible to estimate the "velocity" of gene expression with RNA velocity techniques to develop an approach that addresses both challenges. Because we have access to velocity information, we can treat the Bayesian structure learning problem as a problem of sparse identification of a dynamical system, capturing cyclic feedback loops through time. Since our objective is to model uncertainty over discrete structures, we leverage Generative Flow Networks (GFlowNets) to estimate the posterior distribution over the combinatorial space of possible sparse dependencies. Our results indicate that our method learns posteriors that better encapsulate the distributions of cyclic structures compared to counterpart state-of-the-art Bayesian structure learning approaches.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [41] Pearl J., 2009, CAUSALITY
  • [42] Peters J, 2017, ADAPT COMPUT MACH LE
  • [43] Peters J., 2022, Probabilistic and Causal Inference: The Works of Judea Pearl
  • [44] Pratapa A., 2020, NATURE METHODS, V17
  • [45] Mapping transcriptomic vector fields of single cells
    Qiu, Xiaojie
    Zhang, Yan
    Martin-Rufino, Jorge D.
    Weng, Chen
    Hosseinzadeh, Shayan
    Yang, Dian
    Pogson, Angela N.
    Hein, Marco Y.
    Min, Kyung Hoi
    Wang, Li
    Grody, Emanuelle, I
    Shurtleff, Matthew J.
    Yuan, Ruoshi
    Xu, Song
    Ma, Yian
    Replogle, Joseph M.
    Lander, Eric S.
    Darmanis, Spyros
    Bahar, Ivet
    Sankaran, Vijay G.
    Xing, Jianhua
    Weissman, Jonathan S.
    [J]. CELL, 2022, 185 (04) : 690 - +
  • [46] Cell cycle gene regulation dynamics revealed by RNA velocity and deep-learning
    Riba, Andrea
    Oravecz, Attila
    Durik, Matej
    Jimenez, Sara
    Alunni, Violaine
    Cerciat, Marie
    Jung, Matthieu
    Keime, Celine
    Keyes, William M.
    Molina, Nacho
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 13 (01)
  • [47] Saelens W., 2019, NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, V37
  • [48] Optimal-Transport Analysis of Single-Cell Gene Expression Identifies Developmental Trajectories in Reprogramming (vol 176, pg 928, 2019)
    Schiebinger, Geoffrey
    Shu, Jian
    Tabaka, Marcin
    Cleary, Brian
    Subramanian, Vidya
    Solomon, Aryeh
    Gould, Joshua
    Liu, Siyan
    Lin, Stacie
    Berube, Peter
    Lee, Lia
    Chen, Jenny
    Brumbaugh, Justin
    Rigollet, Philippe
    Hochedlinger, Konrad
    Jaenisch, Rudolf
    Regev, Aviv
    Lander, Eric S.
    [J]. CELL, 2019, 176 (06)
  • [49] Spirtes P., 1991, SOCIAL SCI COMPUTER, V9
  • [50] Tank A., 2021, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence