LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF WASTE COAL AND BIOMASS CO-FIRED POWER PLANT WITH CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE TECHNOLOGIES

被引:0
作者
Sarkar, Surja [1 ]
Bhoi, Prakash [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Southern Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Statesboro, GA 30460 USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2023 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION, IMECE2023, VOL 7 | 2023年
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Waste coal; Biomass cofiring; Carbon capture storage;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
One of the global concerns that have received a lot of attention recently is climate change. Coal, natural gas, petroleum, and other gases constitute the majority of the fuel used to generate utility-scale electricity in the US. Global warming is a result of widespread emissions of greenhouse gases, particularly CO2, from the combustion of fossil fuels. However, due to their lower carbon footprint, biomass-based heat and power generation are expanding quickly, aiding in the achievement of the target of zero carbon emissions. In this study, the life cycle assessment (LCA) of a 100 MW subcritical waste coal and biomass co-fired power plant with and without carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies has been assessed considering raw material extraction, transportation, power generation, and associated inputs and outputs. The findings demonstrate that increasing the biomass ratio reduced global warming potential (GWP), and incorporating CCS further decreased the GWP. However, higher biomass ratios and CCS integration led to increased eutrophication, ozone layer depletion, acidification, and other impact potentials.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]  
Buchheit K.L., 2021, Technoeconomic and Life Cycle Analysis for Bio-Energy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) Baseline
[2]  
Buttermore W.H., 1978, Characterization of coal refuse
[3]   Life Cycle Environmental Impact of Biomass Co-Firing with Coal at a Power Plant in the Greater Houston Area [J].
Kommalapati, Raghava Rao ;
Hossan, Iqbal ;
Botlaguduru, Venkata Sai Vamsi ;
Du, Hongbo ;
Huque, Ziaul .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (07)
[4]  
L.L.N. Laboratory, 2022, Estimated U.S. Energy Consumption in 2021: 97.3 Quads
[5]   A technical and environmental analysis of co-combustion of coal and biomass in fluidised bed technologies [J].
McIlveen-Wright, D. R. ;
Huang, Y. ;
Rezvani, S. ;
Wang, Y. .
FUEL, 2007, 86 (14) :2032-2042
[6]   An LCA-based evaluation of biomass to transportation fuel production and utilization pathways in a large port’s context [J].
Tsalidis G.A. ;
Discha F.E. ;
Korevaar G. ;
Haije W. ;
de Jong W. ;
Kiel J. .
International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 2017, 8 (03) :175-187
[7]   Life cycle environmental impact assessment of fuel mix-based biomass co-firing plants with CO2 capture and storage [J].
Yang, Bo ;
Wei, Yi-Ming ;
Hou, Yunbing ;
Li, Hui ;
Wang, Pengtao .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2019, 252