Exploring Chinese EFL learners' engagement with large language models: A self-determination theory perspective

被引:53
|
作者
Wang, Xiaochen [1 ]
Wang, Siyi [2 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Foreign Studies, Xian, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Normal Univ, Sch Foreign Languages & Cultures, Nanjing, Peoples R China
关键词
EFL learners; Engagement; LLMs; SDT; Chinese context; STUDENTS; WILLINGNESS; EFFICACY; FEEDBACK; BELIEFS;
D O I
10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102014
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Large language models (LLMs) greatly affect language learning, but research on Chinese EFL (English as a Foreign Language) learners' engagement is limited. In this sense, the present study draws upon Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and employs a mixed-methods approach to explore how 210 Chinese EFL Learners engage with LLMs. Findings showed that most of the basic psychological needs (BPNs) play a critical role in predicting behavioral, cognitive, and emotional engagement. However, perceived autonomy did not emerge as a predictor for behavioral engagement, and perceived competence was not found to be a predictor for either behavioral engagement or cognitive engagement. Furthermore, our qualitative interviews showed that the influence of BPNs on EFL learners' engagement with LLMs can be categorized into six thematic areas: self-directed learning empowerment, goal-oriented learning challenges, individual performance enhancement, limited knowledge advancement, collaborative learning access, and interpersonal connection gaps. The findings of this study could provide insights for foreign language teachers in their instructional design and for policymakers in formulating relevant policies.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] PhD students' motivation profiles: A self-determination theory perspective
    Litalien, David
    Toth-Kiraly, Istvan
    Guay, Frederic
    Morin, Alexandre J. S.
    CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 77
  • [32] Narcissism and coach interpersonal style: A self-determination theory perspective
    Matosic, D.
    Ntoumanis, N.
    Boardley, I. D.
    Sedikides, C.
    Stewart, B. D.
    Chatzisarantis, N.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS, 2017, 27 (02) : 254 - 261
  • [33] Coming of age in a warming world: A self-determination theory perspective
    Spitzer, Jenna
    Grapsas, Stathis
    Poorthuis, Astrid M. G.
    Vansteenkiste, Maarten
    Thomaes, Sander
    CHILD DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2024,
  • [34] AUTONOMY AND MOTIVATION: A SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY PERSPECTIVE ON ESP MOTIVATION
    Rubic, Ivana
    JOURNAL OF TEACHING ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC AND ACADEMIC PURPOSES, 2019, 7 (02): : 147 - 158
  • [35] A self-determination theory into the psychological needs of CALL: Probing EFL teachers' autobiographical narratives
    Meihami, Hussein
    Husseini, Fateme
    EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2022, 27 (06) : 7781 - 7803
  • [36] Grit and Foreign Language Enjoyment as Predictors of EFL Learners' Online Engagement: The Mediating Role of Online Learning Self-efficacy
    Derakhshan, Ali
    Fathi, Jalil
    ASIA-PACIFIC EDUCATION RESEARCHER, 2024, 33 (04) : 759 - 769
  • [37] A self-determination perspective on Chinese fifth-graders' task disengagement
    Zhou, Mingming
    Ren, Jing
    SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 38 (02) : 149 - 165
  • [38] Performance grading and motivational functioning and fear in physical education: A self-determination theory perspective
    Krijgsman, Christa
    Vansteenkiste, Maarten
    van Tartwijk, Jan
    Maes, Jolien
    Borghouts, Lars
    Cardon, Greet
    Mainhard, Tim
    Haerens, Leen
    LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2017, 55 : 202 - 211
  • [39] Customer compliance with employee fuzzy requests in service encounters: a self-determination theory perspective
    Teng, Teng
    Zhang, Shengliang
    Li, Xiaodong
    Chen, Yuan
    SERVICE BUSINESS, 2020, 14 (02) : 217 - 240
  • [40] Complementary roles of care and behavioral control in classroom management: The self-determination theory perspective
    Nie, Youyan
    Lau, Shun
    CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 34 (03) : 185 - 194