Machine learning applied to gait analysis data in cerebral palsy and stroke: A systematic review

Background: Among neurological pathologies, cerebral palsy and stroke are the main contributors to walking disorders. Machine learning methods have been proposed in the recent literature to analyze gait data from these patients. However, machine learning methods still fail to translate effectively into clinical applications. This systematic review addressed the gaps hindering the use of machine learning data analysis in the clinical assessment of cerebral palsy and stroke patients. Research Question: What are the main challenges in transferring proposed machine learning methods to clinical applications? Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and IEEE databases were searched for relevant publications on machine learning methods applied to gait analysis data from stroke and cerebral palsy patients until February the 23rd, 2023. Information related to the suitability, feasibility, and reliability of the proposed methods for their effective translation to clinical use was extracted, and quality was assessed based on a set of predefined questions. Results: From 4120 resulting references, 63 met the inclusion criteria. Thirty-one studies used supervised, and 32 used unsupervised machine learning methods. Artificial neural networks and k-means clustering were the most used methods in each category. The lack of rationale for features and algorithm selection, the use of unrepresentative datasets, and the lack of clinical interpretability of the clustering outputs were the main factors hindering the clinical reliability and applicability of these methods. Significance: The literature offers numerous machine learning methods for clustering gait data from cerebral palsy and stroke patients. However, the clinical significance of the proposed methods is still lacking, limiting their translation to real-world applications. The design of future studies must take into account clinical question, dataset significance, feature and model selection, and interpretability of the results, given their criticality for clinical translation.