Nitinol Staple Use in Primary Arthrodesis of Lisfranc Fracture-Dislocations

被引:1
|
作者
Dombrowsky, Alexander R. [1 ]
Strickland, Carson D. [2 ]
Walsh, Devin F. [2 ]
Hietpas, Kayla [3 ]
Conti, Matthew S. [2 ]
Irwin, Todd A. [2 ,3 ]
Cohen, Bruce E. [2 ,3 ]
Ellington, J. Kent [2 ,3 ]
Jones, Carroll P. [2 ,3 ]
Shawen, Scott B. [2 ,3 ]
Ford, Samuel E. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Carolinas Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Charlotte, NC 20226 USA
[2] OrthoCarolina Foot & Ankle Inst, 250 N Caswell Rd Ste 200B, Charlotte, NC 28207 USA
[3] OrthoCarolina Res Inst, Charlotte, NC USA
关键词
midfoot fracture-dislocation; Lisfranc; primary arthrodesis; nitinol staples; nitinol; operative time; efficiency; OPEN REDUCTION; COMPRESSION STAPLES; INTERNAL-FIXATION; INJURIES; HINDFOOT; SCREW; JOINT; FOOT;
D O I
10.1177/10711007241227880
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Primary arthrodesis of Lisfranc fracture-dislocations is a reliable treatment option, yet concerns remain about nonunion. Nitinol staple use has recently proliferated in midfoot arthrodesis. The purpose of this study is to examine the union rate of primary arthrodesis of acute Lisfranc fracture-dislocations treated with nitinol staples compared with traditional plate-and-screw fixation. The secondary objective is to assess the difference in operative times and reoperation rates. Methods: Midfoot fracture-dislocations treated with primary arthrodesis by 7 foot and ankle orthopaedic surgeons were reviewed. Of 160 eligible patients, 121 patients (305 joints) met the required 4-month minimum radiographic follow-up. Radiographic outcomes were analyzed at the individual joint level. Each joint was classified as either staples alone (45 patients, 154 joints), staples plus plates and screws (hybrid) (45 patients, 40 joints), or plates and screws alone (31 patients, 111 joints). The primary outcome was arthrodesis union at each joint fused. Results: Nonunion was more common (9.0%, 10/111) among joints fixed with plate and screws than with hybrid (2.5%, 1/40) or staples only (1.3%, 2/154) (P =.0085). Multivariable regression demonstrated that autograft use was independent associated with union (P =.0035) and plate-and-screw only fixation was an independent risk factor for nonunion (P =.0407). Median operating room and tourniquet times were shorter for hybrid (92 and 83 minutes) and staple only (67 and 63 minutes) constructs compared to plate-and-screw only fixation (105 and 95 minutes) (P =.0001 and.0003). There was no difference in reoperation rates among patients with different fixation types. Conclusion: We found that use of nitinol compression staple and bone autograft in primary arthrodesis of Lisfranc and midfoot fracture-dislocations was associated with both improved union rates and shorter tourniquet and operative times compared to traditional plate-and-screw fixation techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:690 / 697
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Treatment of Lisfranc Fracture-Dislocations with Primary Partial Arthrodesis
    Reinhardt, Keith R.
    Oh, Luke S.
    Schottel, Patrick
    Roberts, Matthew M.
    Levine, David
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 33 (01) : 50 - 56
  • [2] Lisfranc fracture-dislocations: current management
    Moracia-Ochagavia, Inmaculada
    Carlos Rodriguez-Merchan, E.
    EFORT OPEN REVIEWS, 2019, 4 (07): : 430 - 444
  • [3] CASE REVIEW A painful foot: Lisfranc fracture-dislocations
    Welck, Matthew
    Zinchenko, Ruslan
    Tudor, Francois
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 352
  • [4] Diabetic Lisfranc Fracture-Dislocations and Charcot Neuroarthropathy
    Levitt, Bradley A.
    Stapleton, John J.
    Zgonis, Thomas
    CLINICS IN PODIATRIC MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2013, 30 (02) : 257 - +
  • [5] Primary Arthrodesis versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Lisfranc Joint Fracture-Dislocations in Adults A Systematic Review
    Vesely, Bryanna D.
    Michels, Lauren
    King, Matthew A.
    Gangopadhyay, Paula
    Scott, Aaron T.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PODIATRIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2024, 114 (01)
  • [6] Epidemiology, imaging, and treatment of Lisfranc fracture-dislocations revisited
    Kalia, Vivek
    Fishman, Elliot K.
    Carrino, John A.
    Fayad, Laura M.
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2012, 41 (02) : 129 - 136
  • [7] In Brief: Lisfranc Fracture Dislocations
    Scolaro, John
    Ahn, Jaimo
    Mehta, Samir
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2011, 469 (07) : 2078 - 2080
  • [8] The role of reduction and internal fixation of Lisfranc fracture-dislocations: a systematic review of the literature
    Stavlas, Panagiotis
    Roberts, Craig S.
    Xypnitos, Fragiskos N.
    Giannoudis, Peter V.
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2010, 34 (08) : 1083 - 1091
  • [9] Primary arthrodesis versus open reduction internal fixation for complete Lisfranc fracture dislocations: a retrospective study comparing functional and radiological outcomes
    Kirzner, Nathan
    Teoh, Wesley
    Toemoe, Sianne
    Maher, Tim
    Mannambeth, Rejith
    Hughes, Andrew
    Goldbloom, Daniel
    Curry, Hamish
    Bedi, Harvinder
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 90 (04) : 585 - 590
  • [10] Open Reduction And Internal Fixation of Tarsometatarsal (Lisfranc) Fracture Dislocations-Is Arthrodesis Necessary?
    Joseph, Noah M.
    Patel, Raahil
    Freedman, Clara
    Cox, Kaitlyn
    Mir, Hassan R.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2024, 32 (04) : 178 - 185