Choice Repetition Bias in Intertemporal Choice: An Eye-Tracking Study

被引:1
作者
Senftleben, Ulrike [1 ]
Schoemann, Martin [1 ]
Scherbaum, Stefan [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Dresden, Dept Psychol, Dresden, Germany
关键词
attention; choice bias; eye-tracking; intertemporal choice; repetition bias; 2-CHOICE REACTION-TIME; ORBITOFRONTAL CORTEX; VISUAL SALIENCY; GAZE BIAS; DYNAMICS; DECISIONS; ATTENTION; REPRESENTATION; VARIABILITY; COMPUTATION;
D O I
10.1002/bdm.2388
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Intertemporal choices (i.e., the choice between a sooner available but smaller reward and a later available but larger reward) were initially thought to reflect stable preferences for immediate or delayed rewards. However, recently, it has been shown that intertemporal choices are influenced by factors such as context variables and attentional processes. Here, we investigate if another factor, the choice repetition bias, affects decision making and attentional processes in intertemporal choice. The choice repetition bias is characterized by the tendency to repeat previous choices and to be slower when switching to an alternative choice. In a series of two experiments (including a preregistered, eye-tracking study), we find that the choice repetition bias exists in intertemporal choice. We also find tentative support for an early attentional bias towards the favored attribute dimension of the previous choice; however, this effect disappears when taking the whole decision process into account. This finding raises interesting questions about the cognitive processes underlying the choice repetition bias. In addition, we successfully replicate other attentional effects from the intertemporal choice literature (e.g., more fixations on monetary dimension, gaze cascade effect).
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]   Amount and time exert independent influences on intertemporal choice [J].
Amasino, Dianna R. ;
Sullivan, Nicolette J. ;
Kranton, Rachel E. ;
Huettel, Scott A. .
NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR, 2019, 3 (04) :383-392
[2]  
Armel KC, 2008, JUDGM DECIS MAK, V3, P396
[3]   Applications and Innovations of Eye-movement Research in Judgment and Decision Making [J].
Ashby, Nathaniel J. S. ;
Johnson, Joseph G. ;
Krajbich, Ian ;
Wedel, Michel .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2016, 29 (2-3) :96-102
[4]   Shining in the Center: Central Gaze Cascade Effect on Product Choice [J].
Atalay, A. Selin ;
Bodur, H. Onur ;
Rasolofoarison, Dina .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2012, 39 (04) :848-866
[5]   Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 [J].
Bates, Douglas ;
Maechler, Martin ;
Bolker, Benjamin M. ;
Walker, Steven C. .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01) :1-48
[6]   Perceptual Decision-Making: Biases in Post-Error Reaction Times Explained by Attractor Network Dynamics [J].
Berlemont, Kevin ;
Nadal, Jean-Pierre .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 39 (05) :833-853
[8]   A Meta-Analysis on the Effect of Visual Attention on Choice [J].
Bhatnagar, Roopali ;
Orquin, Jacob L. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2022, 151 (10) :2265-2283
[9]   Response repetition biases in human perceptual decisions are explained by activity decay in competitive attractor models [J].
Bonaiuto, James J. ;
de Berker, Archy ;
Bestmann, Sven .
ELIFE, 2016, 5
[10]   Adaptive History Biases Result from Confidence-Weighted Accumulation of past Choices [J].
Braun, Anke ;
Urai, Anne E. ;
Donner, Tobias H. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 38 (10) :2418-2429