The impact of sphygmomanometer placement and cuff placement on blood pressure measurements

被引:0
作者
Zhu, Xiao-Yong [1 ]
Zhang, Pu-Hua [1 ]
Huang, Wen-Yin [1 ]
Huang, Wan [1 ]
Tang, Xin-Hu [1 ]
Yu, Hua [1 ]
Wang, Su-Nan [1 ]
机构
[1] Jiujiang Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Jiujiang, Jiangxi Provinc, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE | 2024年 / 11卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
blood pressure; cardiovascular disease; hypertension; electronic sphygmomanometer; mercury sphygmomanometer; ARM;
D O I
10.3389/fcvm.2024.1388313
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Hypertension is the most significant global risk factor for mortality and morbidity, making standardized blood pressure measurement crucial. Objectives: To investigate whether the location of blood pressure monitors and the positioning of cuffs yield differing results in blood pressure measurements. Methods: Patients admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Jiujiang College between 1 January 2022 and 30 June 2023 were enrolled in this study and randomly allocated into four groups. These groups were defined based on the positioning of monitoring equipment as follows: varied placements of cuffs on automatic blood pressure monitors, different heights for mercury column blood pressure monitors, varied heights for automatic blood pressure monitors, and different orientations for the cuff airbag tubes on electrocardiogram monitors. Blood pressure was measured and recorded for each group, followed by an analysis of the variations in readings across the different setups. Results: In the first cohort of 763 individuals, mean systolic blood pressure measured at the standard upper arm site was 128.8 +/- 10.5 mmHg, compared to 125.3 +/- 10.4 mmHg at the elbow fossa. The corresponding diastolic pressures were 79.2 +/- 10.7 and 75.0 +/- 10.6 mmHg, respectively. The difference in systolic pressure between these positions was significant at 3.48 +/- 3.22 mmHg (t(1)= 29.91, p(1) < 0.001) and for diastolic pressure at 4.23 +/- 1.31mmHg (t(2)= 88.98, p(2) < 0.001). For the subsequent groups, involving 253, 312, and 225 individuals, respectively, blood pressure measurements were analyzed and compared across different methods within each group. All p-values exceeded 0.05, indicating no statistically significant differences. Conclusions: Blood pressure values measured at the elbow fossa position using an upper arm-type automatic sphygmomanometer were found to be lower than those measured at the upper arm position, with a difference of 3.48 mmHg for systolic and 4.23 mmHg for diastolic pressures. It is therefore essential to position the cuff correctly, specifically 2-3 cm above the elbow fossa, when utilizing an upper arm-type automatic sphygmomanometer for blood pressure monitoring. Conversely, the placement of the mercury column sphygmomanometer and the automated sphygmomanometer at varying heights had no significant effect on blood pressure readings. Similarly, the orientation of the electrocardiogram's cuffed balloon tube, whether facing upward or downward, did not influence blood pressure measurement outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF CUFF SIZE AND TIGHTNESS OF FIT ON ACCURACY OF BLOOD-PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS [J].
BANNER, TE ;
GRAVENSTEIN, JS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING, 1991, 7 (04) :281-284
[32]   Influence of aging and increased blood pressure on oscillometric cuff pressure waveform characteristics [J].
Pan, Fan ;
He, Peiyu ;
Pu, Xiaobo ;
Gao, Hu ;
Chen, Fei ;
Feng, Junfeng ;
Zheng, Dingchang .
JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2021, 39 (11) :2157-2163
[33]   Cuff challenges in blood pressure measurement [J].
Palatini, Paolo ;
Asmar, Roland .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, 2018, 20 (07) :1100-1103
[34]   Wearable Wireless-Enabled Oscillometric Sphygmomanometer: A Flexible Ambulatory Tool for Blood Pressure Estimation [J].
Juteau, Nicolas ;
Gosselin, Benoit .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, 2020, 14 (06) :1287-1298
[35]   INTRAARTERIAL PRESSURE ALTERATIONS DURING TAIL-CUFF BLOOD-PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS IN NORMOTENSIVE AND HYPERTENSIVE RATS [J].
FERRARI, AU ;
DAFFONCHIO, A ;
ALBERGATI, F ;
BERTOLI, P ;
MANCIA, G .
JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1990, 8 (10) :909-911
[36]   Wrist Cuff Method Determines Diastolic Pressure in Dual Cuff Blood Pressure System [J].
Jilek, Jiri ;
Stork, Milan .
2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED ELECTRONICS (AE), 2015, :85-88
[37]   Challenges in blood pressure measurement in children with obesity: focus on the cuff [J].
Evripidou, Kleo ;
Chainoglou, Athanasia ;
Kotsis, Vasilios ;
Stabouli, Stella .
PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY, 2025,
[38]   BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT: ARM CIRCUMFERENCE AND CUFF SIZE AVAILABILITY [J].
Veiga, Eugenia Velludo ;
Moura Arcuri, Edna Aparecida ;
Cloutier, Lyne ;
Ferreira Santos, Jair Licio .
REVISTA LATINO-AMERICANA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2009, 17 (04) :455-461
[39]   A perfect replacement for the mercury sphygmomanometer: the case of the hybrid blood pressure monitor [J].
Stergiou, G. S. ;
Karpettas, N. ;
Kollias, A. ;
Destounis, A. ;
Tzamouranis, D. .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 2012, 26 (04) :220-227
[40]   A perfect replacement for the mercury sphygmomanometer: the case of the hybrid blood pressure monitor [J].
G S Stergiou ;
N Karpettas ;
A Kollias ;
A Destounis ;
D Tzamouranis .
Journal of Human Hypertension, 2012, 26 :220-227