The impact of sphygmomanometer placement and cuff placement on blood pressure measurements

被引:0
|
作者
Zhu, Xiao-Yong [1 ]
Zhang, Pu-Hua [1 ]
Huang, Wen-Yin [1 ]
Huang, Wan [1 ]
Tang, Xin-Hu [1 ]
Yu, Hua [1 ]
Wang, Su-Nan [1 ]
机构
[1] Jiujiang Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Jiujiang, Jiangxi Provinc, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE | 2024年 / 11卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
blood pressure; cardiovascular disease; hypertension; electronic sphygmomanometer; mercury sphygmomanometer; ARM;
D O I
10.3389/fcvm.2024.1388313
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Hypertension is the most significant global risk factor for mortality and morbidity, making standardized blood pressure measurement crucial. Objectives: To investigate whether the location of blood pressure monitors and the positioning of cuffs yield differing results in blood pressure measurements. Methods: Patients admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Jiujiang College between 1 January 2022 and 30 June 2023 were enrolled in this study and randomly allocated into four groups. These groups were defined based on the positioning of monitoring equipment as follows: varied placements of cuffs on automatic blood pressure monitors, different heights for mercury column blood pressure monitors, varied heights for automatic blood pressure monitors, and different orientations for the cuff airbag tubes on electrocardiogram monitors. Blood pressure was measured and recorded for each group, followed by an analysis of the variations in readings across the different setups. Results: In the first cohort of 763 individuals, mean systolic blood pressure measured at the standard upper arm site was 128.8 +/- 10.5 mmHg, compared to 125.3 +/- 10.4 mmHg at the elbow fossa. The corresponding diastolic pressures were 79.2 +/- 10.7 and 75.0 +/- 10.6 mmHg, respectively. The difference in systolic pressure between these positions was significant at 3.48 +/- 3.22 mmHg (t(1)= 29.91, p(1) < 0.001) and for diastolic pressure at 4.23 +/- 1.31mmHg (t(2)= 88.98, p(2) < 0.001). For the subsequent groups, involving 253, 312, and 225 individuals, respectively, blood pressure measurements were analyzed and compared across different methods within each group. All p-values exceeded 0.05, indicating no statistically significant differences. Conclusions: Blood pressure values measured at the elbow fossa position using an upper arm-type automatic sphygmomanometer were found to be lower than those measured at the upper arm position, with a difference of 3.48 mmHg for systolic and 4.23 mmHg for diastolic pressures. It is therefore essential to position the cuff correctly, specifically 2-3 cm above the elbow fossa, when utilizing an upper arm-type automatic sphygmomanometer for blood pressure monitoring. Conversely, the placement of the mercury column sphygmomanometer and the automated sphygmomanometer at varying heights had no significant effect on blood pressure readings. Similarly, the orientation of the electrocardiogram's cuffed balloon tube, whether facing upward or downward, did not influence blood pressure measurement outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Correct placement of blood pressure cuff during blood pressure measurement
    Garcia, Mary Grace Uranza
    Ang, Emily
    Ahmad, Noor Melati
    Lim, Chi Ching
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED HEALTHCARE, 2012, 10 (03): : 191 - 196
  • [2] Arm and forearm blood pressure measurements as a function of cuff width
    Moura Arcuri, Edna Apparecida
    Denzin Rosa, Solange Cristina
    Scanavini, Rosa Maria
    Cardin Denzin, Gesiane de Salles
    ACTA PAULISTA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2009, 22 (01) : 37 - 42
  • [3] Cuff size, cuff placement, blood pressure state, and monitoring technique can influence indirect arterial blood pressure monitoring in anesthetized bats (Pteropus vampyrus)
    Paranjape, Vaidehi V.
    Gatson, Bonnie J.
    Bailey, Kate
    Wellehan, James F. X.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2023, 84 (05) : 1 - 13
  • [4] Assessing Blood Pressure Accuracy of an Aneroid Sphygmomanometer in a National Survey Environment
    Ostchega, Yechiam
    Prineas, Ronald J.
    Nwankwo, Tatiana
    Zipf, George
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2011, 24 (03) : 322 - 327
  • [5] Secondary fastener (tape) placement on a blood pressure cuff causes interindividual Doppler blood pressure measurement variability in healthy large-breed dogs
    Martinez, Alejandra B. Principe
    Cochran, Lauren A.
    Ishak, Anthony M.
    Keys, Deborah A.
    Frederick, Steven W.
    JAVMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2024, 262 (12): : 1686 - 1691
  • [6] Comparison between blood pressure readings using a mercury versus an aneroid sphygmomanometer
    Farhan, Kinaan
    Naqvi, S. Tahira Shah
    Rizvi, Syed Asad Hasan
    Zafar, Amara
    Rawala, Muhammad Shabbir
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2020, 25 (01) : 34 - 38
  • [7] Effect of Cuff Design on Auscultatory and Oscillometric Blood Pressure Measurements
    Ringrose, Jennifer S.
    McLean, Donna
    Ao, Peter
    Yousefi, Farahnaz
    Sankaralingam, Sowndramalingam
    Millay, Jack
    Padwal, Raj
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2016, 29 (09) : 1063 - 1069
  • [8] Comparison of cuff-based and cuffless continuous blood pressure measurements in children and adolescents
    Zachwieja, Jacek
    Neyman-Bartkowiak, Anna
    Rabiega, Alina
    Wojciechowska, Marta
    Barabasz, Malgorzata
    Musielak, Anna
    Silska-Dittmar, Magdalena
    Ostalska-Nowicka, Danuta
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HYPERTENSION, 2020, 42 (06) : 512 - 518
  • [9] The Impact of Various Blood Pressure Measurements on Cardiovascular Outcomes
    Bakogiannis, Constantinos
    Stavropoulos, Konstantinos
    Papadopoulos, Christodoulos
    Papademetriou, Vasilios
    CURRENT VASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 19 (03) : 313 - 322
  • [10] Blood pressure differences between a mercury sphygmomanometer and two automatic devices
    Lim H.K.
    Doh I.
    Ahn B.
    Biomedical Engineering Letters, 2015, 5 (04) : 296 - 301