Response Extremes of Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Based on Inverse Reliability and Environmental Contour Method

被引:2
作者
Li, Da [1 ]
Xie, Botao [1 ]
Liu, Tao [1 ]
Bai, Zhuolantai [2 ]
Huang, Bigui [1 ]
Wang, Junrong [2 ]
机构
[1] CNOOC Res Inst, Beijing 100027, Peoples R China
[2] Ocean Univ China, Coll Engn, Qingdao 266100, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
inverse first-order reliability method; inverse second-order reliability method; environmental contour method; floating offshore wind turbine; long-term response analysis; DESIGN; FPSO;
D O I
10.3390/jmse12061032
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
Floating structures are subject to complex marine conditions. To ensure their safety, reliability analysis needs to be conducted during the design phase. However, because of the complexity of traditional full long-term analysis, the environmental contour method (ECM) based on the inverse reliability method, which can combine accuracy and efficiency, is extensively used. Due to the unique environment in the South China Sea, the probabilistic characteristics of three-dimensional (3D) environmental parameters of wind, wave and current are investigated. The ECs of the target sea are established via the ECM based on both the inverse first-order reliability method (IFORM) and inverse second-order reliability method (ISORM). It is found that the sea state forecasted by ISORM is more extreme and may lead to a more conservative design than IFORM. Furthermore, the wind-wave-current combination coefficient matrixes developed using the 3D ECs are proposed for the design of FOWTs in the South China Sea. The validity and practicality of the contours and matrixes are tested by using a floating offshore wind turbine (FOWT) as a numerical example. Then, the short-term response of the structure under the combined wind, wave and current conditions is calculated, providing a theoretical reference for the design of FOWTs.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] ABS, 2024, Guide for Building and ClassingFloating Offshore Wind Turbines
  • [2] Battjes Jurjen, 1972, Ocean Dyn, V25, P179, DOI [10.1007/BF02312702, DOI 10.1007/BF02312702]
  • [3] Joint description of waves and currents applied in a simplified load case
    Bruserud, Kjersti
    Haver, Sverre
    Myrhaug, Dag
    [J]. MARINE STRUCTURES, 2018, 58 : 416 - 433
  • [4] Investigations of the long-term extreme buffeting response of long-span bridges using importance sampling Monte Carlo simulations
    Castellon, Dario Fernandez
    Fenerci, Aksel
    Oiseth, Ole
    Petersen, Oyvind Wiig
    [J]. ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2022, 273
  • [5] CCS, 2021, CCS GD29-2021. Guide for Floating Offshore Wind Turbine
  • [6] Environmental contours based on inverse SORM
    Chai, Wei
    Leira, Bernt J.
    [J]. MARINE STRUCTURES, 2018, 60 : 34 - 51
  • [7] Derbanne Q, 2019, P ASME INT C OCEAN
  • [8] DNV G.L., 2019, DNVGL-RP-C205. Environmental Conditions and Environmental Loads
  • [9] Reliability analysis and Response Based Design of a moored FPSO in West Africa
    Fontaine, E.
    Orsero, P.
    Ledoux, A.
    Nerzic, R.
    Prevosto, M.
    Quiniou, V.
    [J]. STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2013, 41 : 82 - 96
  • [10] Long-term extreme response analysis of a long-span pontoon bridge
    Giske, Finn-Idar Grotta
    Kvale, Knut Andreas
    Leira, Bernt Johan
    Oiseth, Ole
    [J]. MARINE STRUCTURES, 2018, 58 : 154 - 171