Comprehensive Analysis of Perioperative Factors Influencing the Risk of Biochemical Recurrence in Patients with Radical Prostatectomy

被引:0
|
作者
Borz, Mihnea Bogdan [1 ,2 ]
Schitcu, Vlad Horia [1 ,2 ]
Crisan, Nicolae [2 ,3 ]
Petrut, Bogdan [1 ,2 ]
Borz, Oliviu Cristian [4 ]
Borz, Paul Cristian [5 ]
Duquesne, Igor [6 ]
Nasri, Jordan [6 ]
Coman, Ioan [2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Oncol Prof Dr Ion Chiricuta, Cluj Napoca, Romania
[2] Iuliu Hatieganu Univ Med & Pharm, Cluj Napoca, Romania
[3] Clin Municipal Hosp, Cluj Napoca, Romania
[4] Targu Mures Cty Emergency Clin Hosp, Targu Mures, Romania
[5] Reg Inst Gastroenterol & Hepatol Prof Dr Octavian, Cluj Napoca, Romania
[6] Hop Cochin Port Royal, Paris, France
关键词
prostate; cancer; prostatectomy; biochemical; recurrence; GLEASON SCORE; CANCER; MANAGEMENT; INVASION; MARGIN;
D O I
10.22037/uj.v20i.7835]
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To analyze the perioperative factors that influence the risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR) in patients with localized PCa undergoing radical prostatectomy Materials and Methods: A total of 457 patients, operated by 2 surgeons in our high -volume oncological center were included in the initial database. Patients who underwent RP for clinically localized PCa in our clinic from 2016 to 2021 were included in the study. Perioperative data were retrospectively reviewed for this study. Follow-up data including post -operative PSA and adjuvant treatment was prospectively gathered by contacting the patients or from the follow-up consultation. Final database was composed of 366 patients who underwent open or 3D laparoscopic RP. Statistical analysis was performed to emphasize the most powerful parameters that influence the BCR. Results: Accounting for multivariable analysis, 4 parameters were statistically significant: initial PSA (iPSA), Gleason score, vascular involvement and positive surgical margins. For the group of patients with no positive margins, 3 parameters were statistically significant: iPSA above 10,98 ng/mL (AUC=0,71); lymph node involvement and Gleason score. Multivariable Cox regression showed that positive margins and iPSA had a significant impact on the time to BCR. Patients who received adjuvant therapy were excluded from the study. Out of the whole cohort, 27,3% of patients presented BCR. Conclusion: Perioperative factors need to be carefully analyzed and a detailed follow-up needs to be conducted in order to assess the risk of biochemical recurrence, resulting in the optimal time for adjuvant treatment implementation.
引用
收藏
页码:162 / 168
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Predictive factors for biochemical recurrence in radical prostatectomy patients
    Turk, Hakan
    Celik, Orcun
    Un, Sitki
    Yoldas, Mehmet
    Isoglu, Cemal Selcuk
    Karabicak, Mustafa
    Ergani, Batuhan
    Koc, Gokhan
    Zorlu, Ferruh
    Ilbey, Yusuf Ozlem
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 68 (04) : 404 - 409
  • [2] Risk factors predicting the outcome of salvage radiotherapy in patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy
    Kinoshita, Hidefumi
    Shimizu, Yosuke
    Mizowaki, Takashi
    Takayama, Kenji
    Norihisa, Yoshiki
    Kamoto, Toshiyuki
    Kamba, Tomomi
    Hayashino, Yasuaki
    Hiraoka, Masahiro
    Ogawa, Osamu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 20 (08) : 806 - 811
  • [3] Predictors of biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: single-centre analysis
    Carbonara, Umberto
    Adamou, Constantinos
    Carbin, Danny Darlington
    Papadopoulos, Dimitrios
    Fragkoulis, Gerasimos
    Whiting, Danielle
    Kusuma, Murthy
    Hicks, James
    Moschonas, Dimitrios
    Patil, Krishna
    Perry, Matthew James Alexander
    Abou Chedid, Wissam
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 77 (02) : 189 - 195
  • [4] Site of positive surgical margins influences biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy
    Godoy, Guilherme
    Tareen, Basir U.
    Lepor, Herbert
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 104 (11) : 1610 - 1614
  • [5] Predictive factors of late biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy
    Negishi, Takahito
    Kuroiwa, Kentarou
    Hori, Yoshifumi
    Tomoda, Toshihisa
    Uchino, Hiroshi
    Tokuda, Noriaki
    Furubayashi, Nobuki
    Nagase, Kei
    Iwai, Hidenori
    Nakamura, Motonobu
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 47 (03) : 233 - 238
  • [6] A Comprehensive Analysis of the Association Between Gleason Score at a Positive Surgical Margin and the Risk of Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy
    Iremashvili, Viacheslav
    Pelaez, Liset
    Jorda, Merce
    Parekh, Dipen J.
    Punnen, Sanoj
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2019, 43 (03) : 369 - 373
  • [7] Are Diabetic Patients at Increased Risk for Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy?
    Alouane, Houssem Ben Hadj
    Raboudi, Mehdi
    Maatougui, Jasser
    Dridi, Mohamed
    Ghozzi, Samir
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (05)
  • [8] Predictive factors of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer
    Murata, Yukiko
    Tatsugami, Katsunori
    Yoshikawa, Masahiro
    Hamaguchi, Masumitsu
    Yamada, Shigetomo
    Hayakawa, Yusuke
    Ueda, Kouhei
    Momosaki, Seiya
    Sakamoto, Naotaka
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 25 (03) : 284 - 289
  • [9] Post radical prostatectomy predictive factors for biochemical recurrence
    Molina Escudero, R.
    Herranz Amo, F.
    Paez Borda, A.
    Hernandez Fernandez, C.
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2013, 66 (08): : 807 - 814
  • [10] Characteristics and risk factors of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer
    Duan, Guanglan
    Wang, Changmei
    Ma, Caihong
    Zhang, Huiming
    Wei, Jinxing
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2017, 10 (03): : 5320 - 5325