Impact of Preoperative Symptom Duration on Patient-reported Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

被引:0
|
作者
Hartman, Timothy J. [1 ]
Nie, James W. [1 ]
Anwar, Fatima N. [1 ]
Roca, Andrea M. [1 ]
Loya, Alexandra C. [1 ]
Medakkar, Srinath S. [1 ]
MacGregor, Keith R. [1 ]
Oyetayo, Omolabake O. [1 ]
Zheng, Eileen [1 ]
Federico, Vincent P. [1 ]
Massel, Dustin H. [1 ]
Sayari, Arash J. [1 ]
Lopez, Gregory D. [1 ]
Singh, Kern [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthoped Surg, 1611 W Harrison St,Suite 300, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
来源
CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY | 2024年 / 37卷 / 06期
关键词
PROMs; degenerative spondylolisthesis; MIS-TLIF; MCID; CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; WORKERS-COMPENSATION CLAIMS; LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS; SURGERY; DISABILITY; COSTS; CARE;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0000000000001560
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: To assess the impact of preoperative symptom duration (PSD) on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after minimally invasive (MIS) transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for degenerative spondylolisthesis (DSpond). Background: A prolonged duration of preoperative symptoms may implicate inferior long-term outcomes postsurgery. Prior studies of lumbar fusion recipients are limited by the inclusion of heterogeneous populations. Methods: A single-surgeon registry was retrospectively queried for privately insured patients who had undergone primary, elective, single-level MIS-TLIF for DSpond with a recorded symptom start date. Cohorts were formed by PSD: shorter duration (PSD <1 y) or greater duration (GD; PSD >= 1 y). PROMs evaluated included Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Physical Function, Oswestry Disability Index, Visual Analog Scale-Back, Visual Analog Scale-Leg, and 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire. The magnitude of PROM (triangle PROM) improvement from preoperative baseline to 6 weeks and final follow-up (triangle PROM-FF) were compared between cohorts. Intercohort achievement rates of a minimum clinically important difference in each PROM were compared. Results: A total of 133 patients included 85 patients with GD cohort. There were no significant differences in pre hoc demographics and perioperative characteristics between cohorts, as well as preoperative, 6-week, or final follow-up PROMs between cohorts. Both cohorts demonstrated significant improvement in all PROMs at 6 weeks and final follow-up (P <= 0.049, all). There were no significant intercohort differences demonstrated in minimum clinically important difference achievement rates, triangle PROM-6W, or triangle PROM-FF in any PROM. Conclusions: Regardless of the symptom duration before MIS-TLIF for DSpond, patients demonstrate significant improvement in physical function, pain, disability, and mental health. Patients with a GD of preoperative symptoms did not report inferior scores in any PROM domain. Patients with a GD of preoperative symptoms did not suffer inferior rates of clinically meaningful improvement after surgical intervention. These findings should be considered when counseling patients before surgical intervention for DSpond.
引用
收藏
页码:E239 / E244
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Impact of Body Mass Index on Postsurgical Outcomes for Workers' Compensation Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Patel, Madhav R.
    Jacob, Kevin C.
    Chavez, Frank A.
    DesLaurier, Justin T.
    Pawlowski, Hanna
    Prabhu, Michael C.
    Vanjani, Nisheka N.
    Singh, Kern
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2022, 16 (04) : 595 - 604
  • [32] Analysis of Patient-reported Outcomes Measures Used in Lumbar Fusion Surgery Research for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
    Ravishankar, Pavitra
    Winkleman, Robert
    Rabah, Nicholas
    Steinmetz, Michael
    Mroz, Thomas
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2022, 35 (06): : 287 - 294
  • [33] Preoperative Patient-reported Outcomes are not Associated With Sagittal and Spinopelvic Alignment in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Karim, S. Mohammed
    Fisher, Charles
    Glennie, Andrew
    Rampersaud, Raja
    Street, John
    Dvorak, Marcel
    Paquette, Scott
    Kwon, Brian K.
    Charest-Morin, Raphaele
    Ailon, Tamir
    Manson, Neil
    Abraham, Edward
    Thomas, Ken
    Urquhart, Jennifer
    Bailey, Christopher S.
    SPINE, 2022, 47 (16) : 1128 - 1136
  • [34] Do preoperative clinical and radiographic characteristics impact patient outcomes following one-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion based upon presenting symptoms?
    Morse, Kyle W.
    Alluri, Ram K.
    Vaishnav, Avani S.
    Urakawa, Hikari
    Mok, Jung Kee
    Virk, Sohrab S.
    Sheha, Evan D.
    Qureshi, Sheeraz A.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 22 (04) : 570 - 577
  • [35] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Isthmic Spondylolisthesis: In Situ Versus Reduction
    Fan, Guoxin
    Gu, Guangfei
    Zhu, Yanjie
    Guan, Xiaofei
    Hu, Annan
    Wu, Xinbo
    Zhang, Hailong
    He, Shisheng
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 90 : 580 - +
  • [36] Minimally Invasive versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Comparative Effectiveness and Cost-Utility Analysis
    Parker, Scott L.
    Mendenhall, Stephen K.
    Shau, David N.
    Zuckerman, Scott L.
    Godil, Saniya S.
    Cheng, Joseph S.
    McGirt, Matthew J.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2014, 82 (1-2) : 230 - 238
  • [37] Radiographic and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Lordotic Versus Non-lordotic Static Interbody Devices in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Longitudinal Comparative Cohort Study
    Lawless, Michael H.
    Claus, Chad F.
    Tong, Doris
    Jordan, Noah
    Dosanjh, Amarpal
    Hanson, Connor T.
    Carr, Daniel A.
    Houseman, Clifford M.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [38] The Influence of Preoperative Mental Health on PROMIS Physical Function Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Yoo, Joon S.
    Hrynewycz, Nadia M.
    Brundage, Thomas S.
    Mogilevsky, Franchesca A.
    Shah, Holly C.
    Mehraban, Nasima
    Singh, Kern
    SPINE, 2020, 45 (04) : E236 - E243
  • [39] Radiographic and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Anteriorly Placed Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage Versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Posterior Instrumentation
    Lee, Yunsoo
    Heard, Jeremy C.
    McCurdy, Michael A.
    Lambrechts, Mark J.
    Fras, Sebastian I.
    Purtill, William
    Millar, Ben
    Kolowrat, Samantha
    Issa, Tariq Z.
    D'Antonio, Nicholas D.
    Rihn, Jeffrey A.
    Kurd, Mark F.
    Kaye, Ian David
    Canseco, Jose A.
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    Hilibrand, Alan S.
    Kepler, Christopher K.
    Schroeder, Gregory D.
    SPINE, 2024, 49 (15) : 1078 - 1084
  • [40] Anterior Versus Posterior and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Spondylolisthesis: A Comparison of Radiographic, Clinical, and Patient Reported Outcomes
    Lavu, Monish S.
    Halkiadakis, Penelope N.
    Meade, Seth M.
    Makineni, Pratheek S.
    Shost, Michael D.
    Thompson, Nicolas R.
    White, Alexandra J.
    Golubovsky, Joshua L.
    Mroz, Thomas E.
    Steinmetz, Michael P.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2025,