Neural network based Equaliser for non-Gaussian noise

被引:0
作者
Kumar, Ritesh [1 ]
Agrawal, Monika [2 ]
Bhadouria, Vijay Singh [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Bharti Sch Telecommun Technol & Management, New Delhi 110016, India
[2] Indian Inst Technol, Ctr Appl Res Elect, New Delhi, India
关键词
equaliser; DNN; non-Gaussian noise; RNN; UNDERWATER ACOUSTIC COMMUNICATION; DECISION-FEEDBACK EQUALIZER; SPARSE CHANNEL ESTIMATION; ALPHA-STABLE NOISE; PARAMETER-ESTIMATION; SIGNAL-DETECTION; MYRIAD FILTER; CLASS-A; ALGORITHM; MODELS;
D O I
10.1002/dac.5988
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The noise that affects underwater acoustic communication (UWAC) is primarily characterised by its non-stationary nature and is predominantly non-Gaussian in distribution. The Minimum Mean Square Error (MMSE) criterion-based receiver/equaliser is suboptimal for Underwater Acoustic Communication (UWAC). An underwater acoustic communication (UWAC) system that is resilient should have the capability to effectively manage a wide range of underwater noise patterns and complex multipath, non-stationary channels with a high level of reliability. To address these challenges, we suggest the deployment of a robust receiver that autonomously handles the communication channel. This receiver would consist of two stages: the first stage would involve a prefilter based on the time-reversal mirror (TRM), while the second stage would utilise a Recurrent Neural Network (RNN). Analysis of the proposed receiver in different scenarios unequivocally demonstrates its superiority over the conventional Decision Feedback Equalise (DFE) and Deep Neural Network (DNN) based receiver. Performance of DFE Equalizer, Proposed RNN(LSTM and GRU)based equalizer and DNN for 500 data rate of 8PSK modulation with the separationof 5km. image
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Modeling of Underwater noise [J].
Agrawal, Ayushi ;
Kumar, Ritesh ;
Agrawal, Monika .
OCEANS 2019 - MARSEILLE, 2019,
[2]  
Akyildiz I. F., 2004, ACM SIGBED Rev., V1, P3, DOI DOI 10.1145/1121776.1121779
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Archive, O.N.C.D. http://www.oceannetworks.ca, audio data from 1 January 2019 to 5 January 2019
[4]  
Banerjee S, 2014, NATL CONF COMMUN
[5]  
Banerjee Srabani, 2003, Issues Emerg Health Technol, P1
[6]   Sparse Channel Estimation for Multicarrier Underwater Acoustic Communication: From Subspace Methods to Compressed Sensing [J].
Berger, Christian R. ;
Zhou, Shengli ;
Preisig, James C. ;
Willett, Peter .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2010, 58 (03) :1708-1721
[7]   An unsupervised clustering-based scale-lag receiver design approach for the doubly selective underwater acoustic channel [J].
Bhadouria, Vijay Singh ;
Agrawal, Monika ;
Kumar, Ritesh .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2022, 152 (01) :342-353
[8]  
Bhadouria VS., 2017, OCEANS 2017Aberdeen, P1
[9]   Support vector machine classification for large data sets via minimum enclosing ball clustering [J].
Cervantes, Jair ;
Li, Xiaoou ;
Yu, Wen ;
Li, Kang .
NEUROCOMPUTING, 2008, 71 (4-6) :611-619
[10]   Gaussian kernel-aided deep neural network equalizer utilized in underwater PAM8 visible light communication system [J].
Chi, Nan ;
Zhao, Yiheng ;
Shi, Meng ;
Zou, Peng ;
Lu, Xingyu .
OPTICS EXPRESS, 2018, 26 (20) :26700-26712