Too fast or too slow: The speed and persistence of adoption of conservation agriculture in southern Africa

被引:3
作者
Ngoma, Hambulo [1 ]
Marenya, Paswel [2 ]
Tufa, Adane [3 ]
Alene, Arega [3 ]
Matin, Md Abdul [1 ]
Thierfelder, Christian [1 ]
Chikoye, David [4 ]
机构
[1] Int Maize & Wheat Improvement Ctr CIMMYT, Southern Africa Reg Off, POB MP163, Harare, Zimbabwe
[2] Int Maize & Wheat Improvement Ctr CIMMYT, Nairobi, Kenya
[3] Int Inst Trop Agr IITA, Lilongwe, Malawi
[4] Int Inst Trop Agr IITA, Southern Africa Res Hub SARH, Lusaka, Zambia
关键词
Conservation agriculture; Duration analysis; Quantile regression; Time to adoption; Persistent adoption; Dis-adoption; Sustainable intensification; SMALLHOLDER FARMERS; CLIMATE-SMART; FARMING PRACTICES; MINIMUM TILLAGE; TECHNOLOGY; SYSTEMS; CA; ADAPTATION; MALAWI; ZAMBIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123689
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Conservation agriculture (CA) represents a paradigm shift towards more sustainable and climate-smart intensification of smallholder farming systems in southern Africa. This can only be achieved with reasonably fast, widespread, and sustained adoption of CA. However, many farmers are slow to adopt CA and when they do, they often do not continue using it and eventually dis-adopt. We combine duration models and quantile regression models to study how long farmers take to adopt conservation agriculture once they are trained; and to assess the distributional effects of the drivers of the persistence of adoption once a farmer adopts. Both models account for self-selection which makes adoption endogenous. We find that, on average, farmers take four years to adopt once trained and that there is a congruence between factors that reduce the duration to adoption and those that increase the persistence of adoption. Access to CA extension and credit, labor availability, education and hosting demonstrations increase the speed of adoption by 13-28 %. The duration from the first training, access to extension services, and farming experience increase the persistence of adoption, especially in the initial years. The findings point to the need for implementing multi-year CA promotional programs with medium-term time horizons that should prioritize enhanced training through community-embedded demonstrations and learning sites, and digital extension for extended reach.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Aagaard P., 2011, Conservation Farming Unit (CFU)
[2]   The diffusion of new agricultural technologies: The case of crossbred-cow technology in Tanzania [J].
Abdulai, A ;
Huffman, WE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 87 (03) :645-659
[3]   Impact of conservation agriculture technology on household welfare in Zambia [J].
Abdulai, Abdul Nafeo .
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 47 (06) :729-741
[4]  
Andersson J., 2012, CONTESTED AGRONOMY A
[5]   From adoption claims to understanding farmers and contexts: A literature review of Conservation Agriculture (CA) adoption among smallholder farmers in southern Africa [J].
Andersson, Jens A. ;
D'Souza, Shereen .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 187 :116-132
[6]   QUANTILE SELECTION MODELS WITH AN APPLICATION TO UNDERSTANDING CHANGES IN WAGE INEQUALITY [J].
Arellano, Manuel ;
Bonhomme, Stephane .
ECONOMETRICA, 2017, 85 (01) :1-28
[7]   A meta-analysis of the adoption of agricultural technology in Sub-Saharan Africa [J].
Arslan, Aslihan ;
Floress, Kristin ;
Lamanna, Christine ;
Lipper, Leslie ;
Rosenstock, Todd S. .
PLOS SUSTAINABILITY AND TRANSFORMATION, 2022, 1 (07)
[8]   Climate Smart Agriculture? Assessing the Adaptation Implications in Zambia [J].
Arslan, Aslihan ;
McCarthy, Nancy ;
Lipper, Leslie ;
Asfaw, Solomon ;
Cattaneo, Andrea ;
Kokwe, Misael .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 66 (03) :753-780
[9]  
Bishop-Sambrook C., 2004, INT FUND AGR DEV FOO
[10]   Quantile regression with censoring and sample selection [J].
Chen, Songnian ;
Wang, Qian .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2023, 234 (01) :205-226