A comprehensive review of resilience of urban metro systems: A perspective from earthquake engineering

被引：6
作者：
Hu, Jie [1 ]
Wen, Weiping
Zhai, Changhai [1 ]
Pei, Shunshun [1 ]
机构：
[1] Harbin Inst Technol, Minist Educ, Key Lab Struct Dynam Behav & Control, Harbin 150090, Peoples R China
来源：
TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY | 2024年 / 152卷
基金：
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词：
Metro system; Seismic resilience; Functionality; Recovery; Resilience enhancement; SHAKING-TABLE TEST; RAIL TRANSIT NETWORKS; TRACK-BRIDGE INTERACTION; HIGH-SPEED RAILWAY; SUBWAY STATION; UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES; SEISMIC PERFORMANCE; VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS; EMERGENCY RESPONSE; BASE-ISOLATION;
D O I：
10.1016/j.tust.2024.105920
中图分类号：
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号：
0813 ;
摘要：
The paper presents a systematic review of the research advancements on the resilience of urban metro systems from the perspective of earthquake engineering. The review covers the concepts, indicators, and assessment methods of seismic resilience of urban metro systems. Four key aspects of seismic resilience of urban metro systems are reviewed, i.e., seismic damage analysis, post-earthquake functionality assessment, post-earthquake recovery assessment, and seismic resilience enhancement. The seismic damage mechanisms and seismic fragility of metro components are summarized, which are essential foundations for seismic resilience assessment. The post-earthquake functionality assessment methods of metro components and systems are then introduced, emphasizing the importance of reasonable quantification of functionality and consideration of functional interdependencies. Subsequently, examples of post-earthquake recovery of urban metro systems and postearthquake recovery assessment methods are discussed, where the purpose of recovery assessment is to make decisions on recovery schedules to achieve more efficient post-earthquake recovery. The ultimate goal of seismic resilience assessment is to develop effective methods or strategies to ensure and enhance the functionality of urban metro systems, achieving an improvement in seismic resilience. This review summarizes the current state of research and the trends in development, providing directions for future studies on the quantitative seismic resilience analysis of urban metro systems.
引用
收藏
页数：26
相关论文
共 287 条
[1]   A model to quantify the resilience of mass railway transportation systems [J].
Adjetey-Bahun, Kpotissan ;
Birregah, Babiga ;
Chatelet, Eric ;
Planchet, Jean-Luc .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2016, 153 :1-14
[2]  
Agency F.F. E. M., 2004, Multi-Hazard Loss Estimation Methodology?Earthquake Model: HAZUS MR4 Technical Manual
[3]   Internet -: Diameter of the World-Wide Web [J].
Albert, R ;
Jeong, H ;
Barabási, AL .
NATURE, 1999, 401 (6749) :130-131
[4]   Seismic retrofitting of an HV circuit breaker using base isolation with wire ropes. Part 2: Shaking-table test validation [J].
Alessandri, S. ;
Giannini, R. ;
Paolacci, F. ;
Amoretti, M. ;
Freddo, A. .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2015, 98 :263-274
[5]   Seismic retrofitting of an HV circuit breaker using base isolation with wire ropes. Part 1: Preliminary tests and analyses [J].
Alessandri, S. ;
Giannini, R. ;
Paolacci, F. ;
Malena, M. .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2015, 98 :251-262
[6]   Component importance measures for interdependent infrastructure network resilience [J].
Almoghathawi, Yasser ;
Barker, Kash .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 133 :153-164
[7]   A shaking table-based experimental study of seismic response of shield-enlarge-dig type's underground subway station in liquefiable ground [J].
An, Junhai ;
Tao, Lianjin ;
Jiang, Luzhen ;
Yan, Hongjin .
SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2021, 147 (147)
[8]   The collapse mechanism of a subway station during the Great Hanshin earthquake [J].
An, XH ;
Shawky, AA ;
Maekawa, K .
CEMENT & CONCRETE COMPOSITES, 1997, 19 (03) :241-257
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings, Volume 2- Implementation Guide, FEMA P-58-2, V2
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings, Volume 1 - Methodology, FEMA P-58-1, V1
12345678910