Testing a Brief Quitline Intervention for Tobacco Cannabis Co-Users: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study

被引:1
作者
Carpenter, Kelly M. [1 ]
Walker, Denise D. [2 ]
Mullis, Kristina [1 ]
Berlin, Helena M. [1 ]
Short, Etta [3 ]
Javitz, Harold S.
Carlini, Beatriz H. [2 ]
机构
[1] RVO Hlth, Ctr Wellbeing Res, 1101 Red Ventures Dr, Ft Mill, SC 29707 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA USA
[3] RVO Hlth, Ft Mills, SC USA
来源
TOBACCO USE INSIGHTS | 2024年 / 17卷
关键词
Tobacco; cessation; quitlines; cannabis; coaching; interventions; PRIMARY-CARE; DISORDERS;
D O I
10.1177/1179173X241261302
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Tobacco cannabis co-use is common and becoming more prevalent. Frequent and heavy users of cannabis may struggle to quit smoking. Quitlines offer free cessation treatment in the United States and 25% of quitline callers may also be cannabis users. The present paper describes a randomized pilot study of a tailored intervention for cannabis and cigarette co-users. The intervention combines the quitline smoking cessation treatment with a motivational enhancement therapy-based cannabis intervention. Methods: The randomized pilot study was conducted within four state-funded quitlines with quitline coaches as interventionists. 102 quitline callers who were cannabis and cigarette co-users were randomized to receive treatment as usual (TAU) or the new Quitline Check-Up (QLCU) intervention. Outcomes were collected 90 days post-randomization. Primary outcomes included feasibility and acceptability of delivering the QLCU in the quitline setting. Secondary outcomes included 7-day point prevalence tobacco abstinence, past 30-day cannabis use, and Cannabis Use Disorder Identification Test scores.Results: Study participants were heavy cannabis users, averaging 25 days of use in the past 30; nearly 70% used at a level considered hazardous. Fidelity ratings indicated coaches were successful at delivering the intervention. Treatment engagement was high for both groups (TAU m = 3.4 calls; QLCU m = 3.6 calls) as was treatment satisfaction. Intent-to-treat quit rates (with survey non-responders classified as smokers) were 28.6% for the TAU control group and 24.5% for the QLCU group (P = .45). Discussion: Hazardous cannabis use rates were high in this sample of tobacco cannabis co-users calling quitlines to quit smoking. The intervention for co-users was acceptable and feasible to deliver. No improvements in tobacco cessation outcomes were observed. Pragmatic intervention development within a real-world clinical setting can streamline the intervention development process. More research is needed on tobacco cannabis co-users and who can benefit from a tailored intervention. Registered: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04737772, February 4, 2021.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A brief intervention for weight management in primary care: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Lewis, Amanda
    Jolly, Kate
    Adab, Peymane
    Daley, Amanda
    Farley, Amanda
    Jebb, Susan
    Lycett, Deborah
    Clarke, Sarah
    Christian, Anna
    Jin, Jing
    Thompson, Ben
    Aveyard, Paul
    TRIALS, 2013, 14
  • [22] A Brief Psychological Intervention for Chronic Pain in Primary Care: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
    Miller-Matero, Lisa R.
    Hecht, Leah M.
    Miller, Mary Kate
    Autio, Kirsti
    Pester, Bethany D.
    Tobin, Erin T.
    Patel, Shivali
    Braciszewski, Jordan M.
    Maye, Melissa
    Ahmedani, Brian K.
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2021, 22 (07) : 1603 - 1611
  • [23] On-Line Personalized Feedback Intervention for Negative Affect an Cannabis: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
    Buckner, Julia D.
    Zvolensky, Michael J.
    Lewis, Elizabeth M.
    EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 28 (02) : 143 - 149
  • [24] Age groups differences in the prevalence and popularity of individual tobacco product use in young adult and adult marijuana and tobacco co-users and tobacco-only users: Findings from Wave 4 of the population assessment of tobacco and health study
    Cohn, Amy M.
    Chen, Sixia
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2022, 233
  • [25] A Web-Based Self-Help Intervention With and Without Chat Counseling to Reduce Cannabis Use in Problematic Cannabis Users: Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial
    Schaub, Michael P.
    Wenger, Andreas
    Berg, Oliver
    Beck, Thilo
    Stark, Lars
    Buehler, Eveline
    Haug, Severin
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2015, 17 (10)
  • [26] Treatment development, implementation, and participant baseline characteristics: A randomized pilot study of a tailored quitline intervention for individuals who smoke and vape
    Vickerman, Katrina A.
    Carpenter, Kelly M.
    Miles, Lyndsay N.
    Hsu, Johnathan M.
    Watt, Karen A.
    Brandon, Thomas H.
    Hart, Jonathan T.
    Javitz, Harold S.
    Wagener, Theodore L.
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 24
  • [27] A brief intervention for weight management in primary care: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Amanda Lewis
    Kate Jolly
    Peymane Adab
    Amanda Daley
    Amanda Farley
    Susan Jebb
    Deborah Lycett
    Sarah Clarke
    Anna Christian
    Jing Jin
    Ben Thompson
    Paul Aveyard
    Trials, 14
  • [28] A brief alcohol intervention during smoking cessation treatment in daily cigarette smokers: A pilot randomized controlled trial
    Cheung, Yee Tak Derek
    Mak, Tin Shun Titan
    Luk, Tzu Tsun
    Ching, Kam-wing Joe
    Wong, Nga-ting Grace
    Chan, Ching Han Helen
    Wang, Man Ping
    Lam, Tai Hing
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [29] Using Pharmacogenomic Testing in Primary Care: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Study
    Mitrzyk, Beatriz Manzor
    Kadri, Reema
    Farris, Karen B.
    Ellingrod, Vicki L.
    Klinkman, Michael S.
    Ruffin, Mack T.
    Plegue, Melissa A.
    Buis, Lorraine R.
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2019, 8 (08):
  • [30] The ASHA (Hope) Project: Testing an Integrated Depression Treatment and Economic Strengthening Intervention in Rural Bangladesh: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
    Karasz, Alison
    Anne, Shabnam
    Hamadani, Jena Derakhshani
    Tofail, Fahmida
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (01) : 1 - 12