Testing a Brief Quitline Intervention for Tobacco Cannabis Co-Users: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study

被引:1
|
作者
Carpenter, Kelly M. [1 ]
Walker, Denise D. [2 ]
Mullis, Kristina [1 ]
Berlin, Helena M. [1 ]
Short, Etta [3 ]
Javitz, Harold S.
Carlini, Beatriz H. [2 ]
机构
[1] RVO Hlth, Ctr Wellbeing Res, 1101 Red Ventures Dr, Ft Mill, SC 29707 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA USA
[3] RVO Hlth, Ft Mills, SC USA
来源
TOBACCO USE INSIGHTS | 2024年 / 17卷
关键词
Tobacco; cessation; quitlines; cannabis; coaching; interventions; PRIMARY-CARE; DISORDERS;
D O I
10.1177/1179173X241261302
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Tobacco cannabis co-use is common and becoming more prevalent. Frequent and heavy users of cannabis may struggle to quit smoking. Quitlines offer free cessation treatment in the United States and 25% of quitline callers may also be cannabis users. The present paper describes a randomized pilot study of a tailored intervention for cannabis and cigarette co-users. The intervention combines the quitline smoking cessation treatment with a motivational enhancement therapy-based cannabis intervention. Methods: The randomized pilot study was conducted within four state-funded quitlines with quitline coaches as interventionists. 102 quitline callers who were cannabis and cigarette co-users were randomized to receive treatment as usual (TAU) or the new Quitline Check-Up (QLCU) intervention. Outcomes were collected 90 days post-randomization. Primary outcomes included feasibility and acceptability of delivering the QLCU in the quitline setting. Secondary outcomes included 7-day point prevalence tobacco abstinence, past 30-day cannabis use, and Cannabis Use Disorder Identification Test scores.Results: Study participants were heavy cannabis users, averaging 25 days of use in the past 30; nearly 70% used at a level considered hazardous. Fidelity ratings indicated coaches were successful at delivering the intervention. Treatment engagement was high for both groups (TAU m = 3.4 calls; QLCU m = 3.6 calls) as was treatment satisfaction. Intent-to-treat quit rates (with survey non-responders classified as smokers) were 28.6% for the TAU control group and 24.5% for the QLCU group (P = .45). Discussion: Hazardous cannabis use rates were high in this sample of tobacco cannabis co-users calling quitlines to quit smoking. The intervention for co-users was acceptable and feasible to deliver. No improvements in tobacco cessation outcomes were observed. Pragmatic intervention development within a real-world clinical setting can streamline the intervention development process. More research is needed on tobacco cannabis co-users and who can benefit from a tailored intervention. Registered: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04737772, February 4, 2021.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Trajectory of Cannabis Withdrawal in Cannabis and Tobacco Co-Users: A Preliminary Investigation
    Yeap, Je Sern
    Uquillas, Isabela Lara
    George, Tony
    Mizrahi, Romina
    Rabin, Rachel
    NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 47 : 468 - 469
  • [2] Varenicline and nabilone in tobacco and cannabis co-users: effects on tobacco abstinence, withdrawal and a laboratory model of cannabis relapse
    Herrmann, Evan S.
    Cooper, Ziva D.
    Bedi, Gillinder
    Ramesh, Divya
    Reed, Stephanie Collins
    Comer, Sandra D.
    Foltin, Richard W.
    Haney, Margaret
    ADDICTION BIOLOGY, 2019, 24 (04) : 765 - 776
  • [3] Cigarette Smokers Versus Cannabis Smokers Versus Co-users of Cigarettes and Cannabis: A Pilot Study Examining Exposure to Toxicants
    Meier, Ellen
    Tessier, Katelyn M.
    Luo, Xianghua
    Dick, Laura
    Thomson, Nicole M.
    Hecht, Stephen S.
    Carmella, Steven G.
    Murphy, Sharon
    Hatsukami, Dorothy K.
    NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (01) : 125 - 129
  • [4] The adolescent cannabis check-up: Randomized trial of a brief intervention for young cannabis users
    Martin, Greg
    Copeland, Jan
    JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 2008, 34 (04) : 407 - 414
  • [5] Effects of a culturally specific tobacco cessation intervention among African American Quitline enrollees: a randomized controlled trial
    Hooper, Monica Webb
    Carpenter, Kelly
    Payne, Michael
    Resnicow, Ken
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 18
  • [6] Effects of a culturally specific tobacco cessation intervention among African American Quitline enrollees: a randomized controlled trial
    Monica Webb Hooper
    Kelly Carpenter
    Michael Payne
    Ken Resnicow
    BMC Public Health, 18
  • [7] A randomized controlled trial of brief intervention for patients with cannabis use disorder
    Shekhawat, Anil Singh
    Mathur, Rahul
    Sarkar, Siddharth
    Kaloiya, Gauri Shanker
    Balhara, Yatan Pal Singh
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCES IN RURAL PRACTICE, 2023, 14 (04) : 710 - 716
  • [8] CANABIC: CANnabis and Adolescents: effect of a Brief Intervention on their Consumption - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Laporte, Catherine
    Vaillant-Roussel, Helene
    Pereira, Bruno
    Blanc, Olivier
    Tanguy, Gilles
    Frappe, Paul
    Costa, David
    Gaboreau, Yoann
    Badin, Melanie
    Marty, Laurent
    Clement, Gilles
    Dubray, Claude
    Falissard, Bruno
    Llorca, Pierre-Michel
    Vorilhon, Philippe
    TRIALS, 2014, 15
  • [9] CANABIC: CANnabis and Adolescents: effect of a Brief Intervention on their Consumption – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Catherine Laporte
    Hélène Vaillant-Roussel
    Bruno Pereira
    Olivier Blanc
    Gilles Tanguy
    Paul Frappé
    David Costa
    Yoann Gaboreau
    Mélanie Badin
    Laurent Marty
    Gilles Clément
    Claude Dubray
    Bruno Falissard
    Pierre-Michel Llorca
    Philippe Vorilhon
    Trials, 15
  • [10] Cannabis and Young Users-A Brief Intervention to Reduce Their Consumption (CANABIC): A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial in Primary Care
    Laporte, Catherine
    Vaillant-Roussel, Helene
    Pereira, Bruno
    Blanc, Olivier
    Eschalier, Benedicte
    Kinouani, Sherazade
    Brousse, Georges
    Llorca, Pierre-Michel
    Vorilhon, Philippe
    ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2017, 15 (02) : 131 - 139