Quality of pineapple fruit and evaluation of the intercropping of pineapple, cassava and cowpea beans

被引:1
作者
dos Santos, Nadia Souza [1 ]
Alves, Jose M. Arcanjo [1 ]
Uchoa, Sandra C. Pereira [1 ]
Albuquerque, Jose A. Alves [1 ]
da Silva, Deyse C. Oliveira [1 ]
Alvarez, Richard A. Molina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Roraima UFRR, Programa Posgrad Agron POSAGRO, Boa Vista, Brazil
关键词
Ananas comosus; land use efficiency; Manihot esculenta; polyculture; Vigna unguiculata; LAND EQUIVALENT RATIO; GROWTH;
D O I
10.51372/bioagro362.4
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to evaluate the fruit quality of pineapple in consortium with cowpea and cassava. The experiment was conducted in the state of Roraima, Brazil, with the individual cultivation of pineapple (cv. P & eacute;rola) and in consortium with cowpea beans and cassava at different spacings (0.40; 0.60; 0.80; 1.00; 1.20 m) with 14 treatments. The experimental design used was completely randomized blocks with three replications. The crops were planted simultaneously. The pineapple, as the main crop, was harvested at 17 months, and the following characteristics were evaluated: average fruit diameter, fruit length without crown, crown length, soluble solids content, fruit firmness without peel, and average commercial fruit weight (yield). For the other crops, productivity was evaluated to determine land use efficiency. The soluble solids content in the fruits was not affected by the treatments, with a general average of 13.35 degrees Brix. However, the physics characteristics were negatively affected at higher cassava densities, resulting in fruits with smaller diameter and length, directly impacting productivity. The productivity of cowpea was not reduced by the consortium, similar to the productivity of cassava, which was only reduced by the higher density.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 174
页数:12
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
de Albuquerque JDA, 2012, REV CIENC AGRON, V43, P532, DOI 10.1590/S1806-66902012000300016
[2]  
Alves J.M.A., 2009, Revista Agro@mbiente On-line, V3, P15, DOI [10.18227/1982-8470ragro.v3i1.243, DOI 10.18227/1982-8470RAGRO.V3I1.243]
[3]  
Andrade M.G.S., 2015, Revista Agropecuaria Tecnica, V36, P96
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Instrucao Normativa n 1 de 1 de fevereiro de 2002. Diario Oficial da Uniao, Poder Executivo
[5]  
Berili SD, 2014, REV BRAS FRUTIC, V36, P503
[6]   QUALITY OF PINEAPPLE COMMERCIALIZED BY COOPERFRUTO - MIRANORTE, TOCANTINS, BRAZIL [J].
Bezerra Pereira, Mireia Aparecida ;
Siebeneichler, Susana Cristine ;
Lorenconi, Rogerio ;
Adorian, Gentil Cavalheiro ;
da Silva, Jucielle Cardoso ;
Maciel Garcia, Rogerio Braga ;
Luz Pequeno, Diego Noleto ;
de Souza, Clovis Maurilio ;
Freire de Brito, Raimundo Filho .
REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE FRUTICULTURA, 2009, 31 (04) :1048-1053
[7]  
Bilieri C.E., 2014, Cadernos de Agroecologia, V9, P1
[8]  
Coelho MA, 2017, WATER RESOUR IRRIG M, V6, P151
[9]  
Custódio RA, 2016, BIOSCI J, V32, P839
[10]   ORGANIC POLYCULTURE OF PASSION FRUIT, PINEAPPLE, CORN AND CASSAVA: THE INFLUENCE OF GREEN MANURE AND DISTANCE BETWEEN ESPALIERS [J].
de Araujo Neto, Sebastiao Elviro ;
Campos, Pedro Arruda ;
Tavella, Leonardo Barreto ;
da Silva Solino, Antonio Jussier ;
da Silva, Irene Ferro .
CIENCIA E AGROTECNOLOGIA, 2014, 38 (03) :247-255