UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION AND GLOBAL SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF SEISMIC FRAGILITY CURVES USING KRIGING

被引:3
作者
Gauchy, C. [1 ,2 ]
Feau, C. [1 ]
Garnier, J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Saclay, Serv Etud Mecan & Therm, CEA, F-91191 Gif Sur Yvette, France
[2] Inst Polytech Paris, Ecole Polytech, CMAP, F-91128 Palaiseau, France
关键词
seismic fragility curves; uncertainty quantification; Gaussian processes; earthquake engineering; EARTHQUAKE; EMULATION; REDUCTION; DIMENSION; MODELS;
D O I
10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.2023046480
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Seismic fragility curves have been introduced as key components of seismic probabilistic risk assessment studies. They express the probability of failure of mechanical structures conditional to a seismic intensity measure and must take into account various sources of uncertainties, the so-called epistemic uncertainties (i.e., coming from the uncertainty on the mechanical parameters of the structure) and the aleatory uncertainties (i.e., coming from the randomness of the seismic ground motions). For simulation -based approaches we propose a methodology to build and calibrate a Gaussian process surrogate model to estimate a family of nonparametric seismic fragility curves for a mechanical structure by propagating both the surrogate model uncertainty and the epistemic ones. Gaussian processes have indeed the main advantage to propose both a predictor and an assessment of the uncertainty of its predictions. In addition, we extend this methodology to sensitivity analysis. Global sensitivity indices such as aggregated Sobol' indices and kernel -based indices are proposed to know how the uncertainty on the seismic fragility curves is apportioned according to each uncertain mechanical parameter. This comprehensive uncertainty quantification framework is finally applied to an industrial test case consisting of a part of a piping system of a pressurized water reactor.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 63
页数:25
相关论文
共 64 条
[31]  
Iooss B., 2015, Uncertainty Management in Simulation-Optimization of Complex Systems: Algorithms and Applications, P101, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4899-7547-8_5
[32]   Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of functional risk curves based on Gaussian processes [J].
Iooss, Bertrand ;
Le Gratiet, Loic .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2019, 187 :58-66
[33]   SEISMIC FRAGILITIES FOR NUCLEAR-POWER PLANT RISK STUDIES [J].
KENNEDY, RP ;
RAVINDRA, MK .
NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 1984, 79 (01) :47-68
[34]   PROBABILISTIC SEISMIC SAFETY STUDY OF AN EXISTING NUCLEAR-POWER PLANT [J].
KENNEDY, RP ;
CORNELL, CA ;
CAMPBELL, RD ;
KAPLAN, S ;
PERLA, HF .
NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 1980, 59 (02) :315-338
[35]   Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? [J].
Kiureghian, Armen Der ;
Didevsen, Ove .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2009, 31 (02) :105-112
[36]   Design and analysis of computer experiments [J].
Kuhnt, Sonja ;
Steinberg, David M. .
ASTA-ADVANCES IN STATISTICAL ANALYSIS, 2010, 94 (04) :307-309
[37]   Kriging metamodeling for seismic response distribution estimation [J].
Kyprioti, Aikaterini P. ;
Taflanidis, Alexandros A. .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2021, 50 (13) :3550-3576
[38]   Statistical procedures for developing earthquake damage fragility curves [J].
Lallemant, David ;
Kiremidjian, Anne ;
Burton, Henry .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2015, 44 (09) :1373-1389
[39]   Model Assisted Probability of Detection Curves: New Statistical Tools and Progressive Methodology [J].
Le Gratiet, Loic ;
Iooss, Bertrand ;
Blatman, Geraud ;
Browne, Thomas ;
Cordeiro, Sara ;
Goursaud, Benjamin .
JOURNAL OF NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, 2017, 36 (01)
[40]   A Bayesian Approach for Global Sensitivity Analysis of (Multifidelity) Computer Codes [J].
Le Gratiet, Loic ;
Cannamela, Claire ;
Iooss, Bertrand .
SIAM-ASA JOURNAL ON UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION, 2014, 2 (01) :336-363