UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION AND GLOBAL SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF SEISMIC FRAGILITY CURVES USING KRIGING

被引:0
作者
Gauchy, C. [1 ,2 ]
Feau, C. [1 ]
Garnier, J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Saclay, Serv Etud Mecan & Therm, CEA, F-91191 Gif Sur Yvette, France
[2] Inst Polytech Paris, Ecole Polytech, CMAP, F-91128 Palaiseau, France
关键词
seismic fragility curves; uncertainty quantification; Gaussian processes; earthquake engineering; EARTHQUAKE; EMULATION; REDUCTION; DIMENSION; MODELS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Seismic fragility curves have been introduced as key components of seismic probabilistic risk assessment studies. They express the probability of failure of mechanical structures conditional to a seismic intensity measure and must take into account various sources of uncertainties, the so-called epistemic uncertainties (i.e., coming from the uncertainty on the mechanical parameters of the structure) and the aleatory uncertainties (i.e., coming from the randomness of the seismic ground motions). For simulation -based approaches we propose a methodology to build and calibrate a Gaussian process surrogate model to estimate a family of nonparametric seismic fragility curves for a mechanical structure by propagating both the surrogate model uncertainty and the epistemic ones. Gaussian processes have indeed the main advantage to propose both a predictor and an assessment of the uncertainty of its predictions. In addition, we extend this methodology to sensitivity analysis. Global sensitivity indices such as aggregated Sobol' indices and kernel -based indices are proposed to know how the uncertainty on the seismic fragility curves is apportioned according to each uncertain mechanical parameter. This comprehensive uncertainty quantification framework is finally applied to an industrial test case consisting of a part of a piping system of a pressurized water reactor.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 63
页数:25
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   NEW LOOK AT STATISTICAL-MODEL IDENTIFICATION [J].
AKAIKE, H .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1974, AC19 (06) :716-723
[2]   An efficient approach for computing analytical non-parametric fragility curves [J].
Altieri, Domenico ;
Patelli, Edoardo .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2020, 85
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1984, Ser. Stat., DOI DOI 10.1080/02331888408801747
[4]   Uncertainty propagation in probabilistic seismic loss estimation [J].
Baker, Jack W. ;
Cornell, C. Allin .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2008, 30 (03) :236-252
[5]   Efficient Analytical Fragility Function Fitting Using Dynamic Structural Analysis [J].
Baker, Jack W. .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2015, 31 (01) :579-599
[6]   A Generalized Kernel Method for Global Sensitivity Analysis [J].
Barr, John ;
Rabitz, Herschel .
SIAM-ASA JOURNAL ON UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION, 2022, 10 (01) :27-54
[7]   Fragility and risk assessment of aboveground storage tanks subjected to concurrent surge, wave, and wind loads [J].
Bernier, Carl ;
Padgett, Jamie E. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2019, 191
[8]  
BISHOP C. M., 2006, PATTERN RECOGN
[9]   On the importance of uncertain factors in seismic fragility assessment [J].
Borgonovo, E. ;
Zentner, I. ;
Pellegri, A. ;
Tarantola, S. ;
de Rocquigny, E. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2013, 109 :66-76
[10]  
Borgonovo E, 2017, INT SER OPER RES MAN, V251, P129, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-52259-3_14