Life cycle impacts of concentrated solar power generation on land resources and soil carbon losses in the United States

被引:3
|
作者
Rangarajan, Shreya [1 ]
Hernandez, Rebecca R. [2 ,3 ]
Jordaan, Sarah M. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Adv Int Studies, Washington, DC 21218 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Land & Air & Water Resources, Davis, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif Davis, Wild Energy Ctr, Davis, CA USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Environm Hlth & Engn, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[5] McGill Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Montreal, PQ, Canada
来源
FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABILITY | 2022年 / 3卷
关键词
concentrated solar power (CSP); life cycle assessment; land-use and land-cover change (LULCC); soil carbon; ecosystem services; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; MOJAVE-DESERT; WARM DESERTS; ENERGY;
D O I
10.3389/frsus.2022.1021971
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Endpoint impacts related to the transformation of land-including that related to energy infrastructure-have yet to be fully quantified and understood in life cycle assessment (LCA). Concentrated solar power (CSP) which generates electricity by using mirrors to concentrate incoming shortwave radiation onto a receiver, may serve as an alternate source of reliable baseload power in the coming years. As of 2019 (baseline year of the study), the United States (U.S.) had 1.7 GW of installed capacity across a total of eight CSP sites. In this study, we (1) develop an empirical, spatially explicit methodology to categorize physical elements embodied in energy infrastructure using a LCA approach and manual image annotation, (2) use this categorization scheme to quantify land- and ecosystem service-related endpoint impacts, notably potential losses in soil carbon, owing to energy infrastructure development and as a function of electricity generated (i.e., megawatt-hour, MWh); and (3) validate and apply this method to CSP power plants within the U.S. In the Western U.S., CSP projects are sited in Arizona, California, and Nevada. Project infrastructure can be disaggregated into the following physical elements: mirrors ("heliostats"), generators, internal roads, external roads, substations, and water bodies. Of these elements, results reveal that mirrors are the most land intensive element of CSP infrastructure (>90%). Median land transformation and capacity-based land-use efficiency are 0.4 (range of 0.3-6.8) m(2)/MWh and 40 (range of 11-48) W/m(2), respectively. Soil grading and other site preparation disturbances may result in the release of both organic and inorganic carbon-the latter representing the majority stocks in deeper caliche layers-thus leading to potentially significant losses of stored carbon. We estimate three scenarios of soil carbon loss into the atmosphere across 30 years, based on land transformation in m(2) per megawatt-hour (m(2)/MWh) and carbon stock in kilograms of carbon per megawatt-hour (kg C/MWh). Results reveal that potential belowground CO2 released may range from 7 to 137% of total life cycle CO2 emissions. While this study takes a simplistic approach to estimating loss of carbon, the broad methodology provides a valuable baseline for improving comparative analyses of land-related endpoint impacts across energy technologies and other product systems.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] OVERLOOKED IMPACTS OF POWER GENERATION: THE LIFE CYCLE SIDE OF THE STORY
    Portugal-Pereira, Joana
    Koberle, Alexandre
    Lucena, Andre F. P.
    Szklo, Alexandre
    Schaeffer, Roberto
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT: BRINGING TOGETHER ENGINEERING AND ECONOMICS, 2015, : 467 - 475
  • [2] Life-cycle impact assessment of renewable electricity generation systems in the United States
    Mahmud, M. A. Parvez
    Huda, Nazmul
    Farjana, Shahjadi Hisan
    Lang, Candace
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 151 : 1028 - 1045
  • [3] Life cycle analysis of external costs of a parabolic trough Concentrated Solar Power plant
    Mahlangu, Norah
    Thopil, George Alex
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 195 : 32 - 43
  • [4] Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions associated with nuclear power generation in the United States
    Ng, Jun Hong Clarence
    Vyawahare, Pradeep
    Benavides, Pahola Thathiana
    Gan, Yu
    Sun, Pingping
    Boardman, Richard
    Marcinkoski, Jason
    Elgowainy, Amgad
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2025,
  • [5] Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of carbon capture for petroleum refining, ammonia production, and thermoelectric power generation in the United States
    Young, Ben
    Krynock, Michelle
    Carlson, Derrick
    Hawkins, Troy R.
    Marriott, Joe
    Morelli, Ben
    Jamieson, Matthew
    Cooney, Gregory
    Skone, Timothy J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2019, 91
  • [6] Exergetic and environmental life cycle assessment analysis of concentrated solar power plants
    Ehtiwesh, Ismael A. S.
    Coelho, Margarida C.
    Sousa, Antonio C. M.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 56 : 145 - 155
  • [7] Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas emission effects of biodiesel in the United States with induced land use change impacts
    Chen, Rui
    Qin, Zhangcai
    Han, Jeongwoo
    Wang, Michael
    Taheripour, Farzad
    Tyner, Wallace
    O'Connor, Don
    Duffield, James
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 251 : 249 - 258
  • [8] Life Cycle Analysis of Ecological Impacts of an Offshore and a Land-Based Wind Power Plant
    Piasecka, Izabela
    Tomporowski, Andrzej
    Flizikowski, Jozef
    Kruszelnicka, Weronika
    Kasner, Robert
    Mrozinski, Adam
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2019, 9 (02):
  • [9] Life cycle assessment of coal-fired solar-assisted carbon capture power generation system integrated with organic Rankine cycle
    Dong, Zhijian
    Ye, Xuemin
    Jiang, Jintao
    Li, Chunxi
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 356
  • [10] Thermodynamic analysis of an integrated transcritical carbon dioxide power cycle for concentrated solar power systems
    AlZahrani, Abdullah A.
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    SOLAR ENERGY, 2018, 170 : 557 - 567