Efficacy and Safety of Lumbar Drainage before Endovascular Treatment for Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms

被引:0
作者
Terakado, Toshitsugu [1 ,2 ]
Ito, Yoshiro [3 ]
Hirata, Koji [4 ]
Sato, Masayuki [3 ]
Takigawa, Tomoji [5 ]
Marushima, Aiki [3 ]
Hayakawa, Mikito [4 ]
Tsuruta, Wataro [6 ]
Kato, Noriyuki [7 ]
Nakai, Yasunobu [1 ]
Suzuki, Kensuke [5 ]
Matsumaru, Yuji [3 ,4 ]
Ishikawa, Eiichi [3 ]
机构
[1] Tsukuba Med Ctr Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
[2] Koyama Mem Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Kashima, Ibaraki, Japan
[3] Univ Tsukuba, Fac Med, Dept Neurosurg, Tennodai 1 1 1, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058575, Japan
[4] Univ Tsukuba, Fac Med, Div Stroke Prevent & Treatment, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
[5] Dokkyo Med Univ, Saitama Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Koshigaya, Saitama, Japan
[6] Toranomon Gen Hosp, Dept Neuroendovasc Therapy, Tokyo, Japan
[7] Natl Hosp Org Mito Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Higashi, Ibaraki, Japan
关键词
cerebrospinal fluid; drainage; subarachnoid hemorrhage; endovascular procedures; SHUNT-DEPENDENT HYDROCEPHALUS; SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE; CEREBROSPINAL-FLUID; COIL EMBOLIZATION; RISK; MANAGEMENT; PREDICTORS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.5797/jnet.oa.2023-0069
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Intraoperative rebleeding during endovascular treatment for ruptured intracranial aneurysms is associated with poor prognosis. Lumbar drainage is performed preoperatively to control intracranial pressure; however, it is associated with a risk of brain herniation or rebleeding because intracranial pressure may change rapidly. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of preoperative lumbar drainage. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 375 patients who underwent endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms at our institution between April 2013 and March 2018. The incidence of rebleeding and clinical outcomes were compared between patients who did and did not undergo preoperative lumbar drainage. Results: Among the 375 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms, 324 (86.0%) and 51 (14.0%) patients did and did not undergo lumbar drainage, respectively. The incidence of rebleeding was 11/324 (3.4%) and 2/51 (3.9%) in lumbar drainage and nonlumbar drainage groups, respectively, with no statistical differences (p = 0.98). Of the rebleeding cases, 9/11 (81%) and 2/2 (100%) in lumbar drainage and nonlumbar drainage groups, respectively, were due to intraoperative bleeding, and 2/11 (19%) in the lumbar drainage group, the causes of the rebleeding were undetermined. The incidence of symptomatic vasospasm did not differ significantly between the groups (13.2% vs. 11.8%, P = 0.776), while the incidence of hydrocephalus (24.6% vs. 11.8%, P = 0.043) and meningitis (15.2% vs. 5.9%, P = 0.075) were slightly higher in the lumbar drainage group. Favorable clinical outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score <2) at discharge were less frequent in the lumbar drainage group (55.3% vs. 70.0%, P = 0.051). No significant differences were observed in the propensity score-matched analysis. Conclusion: Lumbar drainage before endovascular treatment for ruptured intracranial aneurysms is a safe procedure that does not increase the incidence of rebleeding.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 36
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cost Analysis of Endovascular Coiling and Surgical Clipping for the Treatment of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms
    Monsivais, Daniel
    Morales, Miriam
    Day, Arthur
    Kim, Dong
    Hoh, Brian
    Blackburn, Spiros
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 124 : E125 - E130
  • [42] Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Various Endovascular Approaches for Treatment of Infectious Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review
    Desai, Bhargav
    Soldozy, Sauson
    Desai, Harshal
    Kumar, Jeyan
    Shah, Smit
    Raper, Daniel M.
    Park, Min S.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 144 : 293 - +
  • [43] The safety of intraoperative lumbar subarachnoid drainage for acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysm: Technical note
    Connolly, ES
    Kader, AA
    Frazzini, VI
    Winfree, CJ
    Solomon, RA
    SURGICAL NEUROLOGY, 1997, 48 (04): : 338 - 342
  • [44] Efficacy and predicting factors of multimodal treatment for ruptured intracranial vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms
    Duangprasert, Gahn
    Noiphithak, Raywat
    Sukhor, Sasikan
    Tantongtip, Dilok
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2023, 46 (01)
  • [45] Endovascular treatment for ruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms
    Sugiu, K
    NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2004, 32 (12): : 1229 - 1238
  • [46] Simultaneous Endovascular Treatment of Ruptured Cerebral Aneurysms and Vasospasm
    Cho, Young Dae
    Han, Moon Hee
    Ahn, Jun Hyong
    Jung, Seung Chai
    Kim, Chang Hun
    Kang, Hyun-Seung
    Kim, Jeong Eun
    Lim, Jeong Wook
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 16 (01) : 180 - 187
  • [47] Impact of anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy on procedural hemorrhage rates following endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms
    Ding, Dale
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2014, 116 : 104 - 105
  • [48] Factors affecting outcome after endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms
    Fiehler, Jens
    Byrne, James V.
    CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROLOGY, 2009, 22 (01) : 103 - 108
  • [49] Endovascular Treatment of Very Small Intracranial Aneurysms
    Iskandar, A.
    Nepper-Rasmussen, J.
    INTERVENTIONAL NEURORADIOLOGY, 2011, 17 (03) : 299 - 305
  • [50] Endovascular treatment of very small intracranial aneurysms
    Ioannidis, Ioannis
    Lalloo, Shivendra
    Corkill, Rufus
    Kuker, Wilhelm
    Byrne, James V.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2010, 112 (03) : 551 - 556